1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/denoland/deno.git synced 2024-12-22 23:34:47 -05:00
denoland-deno/cli/bench/lsp.rs

431 lines
12 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2018-2024 the Deno authors. All rights reserved. MIT license.
use deno_core::serde::Deserialize;
use deno_core::serde_json;
use deno_core::serde_json::json;
use deno_core::serde_json::Value;
use lsp_types::Uri;
use std::collections::HashMap;
2021-03-25 14:17:37 -04:00
use std::path::Path;
use std::str::FromStr;
use std::time::Duration;
use test_util::lsp::LspClientBuilder;
chore(lsp): Add benchmark for performance on a large real-world repo (#23395) This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload. The repo being benchmarked is [deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a file (to simulate an actual user interaction). The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement. Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new benchmark is the last one listed): **1.42.0** ```test Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 379ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1142ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 51ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 443ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 25121ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ``` **1.42.3** ```text Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 383ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1135ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 55ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 440ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 11675ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ```
2024-04-16 15:26:51 -04:00
use test_util::PathRef;
use tower_lsp::lsp_types as lsp;
static FIXTURE_CODE_LENS_TS: &str = include_str!("testdata/code_lens.ts");
static FIXTURE_DB_TS: &str = include_str!("testdata/db.ts");
static FIXTURE_DB_MESSAGES: &[u8] = include_bytes!("testdata/db_messages.json");
chore(lsp): Add benchmark for performance on a large real-world repo (#23395) This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload. The repo being benchmarked is [deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a file (to simulate an actual user interaction). The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement. Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new benchmark is the last one listed): **1.42.0** ```test Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 379ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1142ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 51ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 443ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 25121ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ``` **1.42.3** ```text Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 383ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1135ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 55ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 440ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 11675ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ```
2024-04-16 15:26:51 -04:00
static FIXTURE_DECO_APPS: &[u8] =
include_bytes!("testdata/deco_apps_requests.json");
#[derive(Debug, Deserialize)]
enum FixtureType {
#[serde(rename = "action")]
Action,
#[serde(rename = "change")]
Change,
#[serde(rename = "completion")]
Completion,
#[serde(rename = "highlight")]
Highlight,
#[serde(rename = "hover")]
Hover,
}
#[derive(Debug, Deserialize)]
struct FixtureMessage {
#[serde(rename = "type")]
fixture_type: FixtureType,
params: Value,
}
chore(lsp): Add benchmark for performance on a large real-world repo (#23395) This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload. The repo being benchmarked is [deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a file (to simulate an actual user interaction). The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement. Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new benchmark is the last one listed): **1.42.0** ```test Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 379ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1142ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 51ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 443ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 25121ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ``` **1.42.3** ```text Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 383ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1135ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 55ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 440ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 11675ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ```
2024-04-16 15:26:51 -04:00
/// replaces the root directory in the URIs of the requests
/// with the given root path
fn patch_uris<'a>(
reqs: impl IntoIterator<Item = &'a mut tower_lsp::jsonrpc::Request>,
root: &PathRef,
) {
for req in reqs {
let mut params = req.params().unwrap().clone();
let new_req = if let Some(doc) = params.get_mut("textDocument") {
if let Some(uri_val) = doc.get_mut("uri") {
let uri = uri_val.as_str().unwrap();
*uri_val =
Value::from(uri.replace(
"file:///",
&format!("file://{}/", root.to_string_lossy()),
));
}
let builder = tower_lsp::jsonrpc::Request::build(req.method().to_owned());
let builder = if let Some(id) = req.id() {
builder.id(id.clone())
} else {
builder
};
Some(builder.params(params).finish())
} else {
None
};
if let Some(new_req) = new_req {
*req = new_req;
}
}
}
fn bench_deco_apps_edits(deno_exe: &Path) -> Duration {
let mut requests: Vec<tower_lsp::jsonrpc::Request> =
serde_json::from_slice(FIXTURE_DECO_APPS).unwrap();
let apps =
test_util::root_path().join("cli/bench/testdata/lsp_benchdata/apps");
// it's a bit wasteful to do this for every run, but it's the easiest with the way things
// are currently structured
patch_uris(&mut requests, &apps);
let mut client = LspClientBuilder::new()
.use_diagnostic_sync(false)
.set_root_dir(apps.clone())
.deno_exe(deno_exe)
.build();
client.initialize(|c| {
c.set_workspace_folders(vec![lsp_types::WorkspaceFolder {
uri: apps.uri_dir(),
chore(lsp): Add benchmark for performance on a large real-world repo (#23395) This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload. The repo being benchmarked is [deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a file (to simulate an actual user interaction). The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement. Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new benchmark is the last one listed): **1.42.0** ```test Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 379ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1142ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 51ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 443ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 25121ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ``` **1.42.3** ```text Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 383ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1135ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 55ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 440ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 11675ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ```
2024-04-16 15:26:51 -04:00
name: "apps".to_string(),
}]);
c.set_deno_enable(true);
c.set_unstable(true);
c.set_preload_limit(1000);
c.set_config(apps.join("deno.json").as_path().to_string_lossy());
});
let start = std::time::Instant::now();
let mut reqs = 0;
for req in requests {
if req.id().is_none() {
client.write_notification(req.method(), req.params());
} else {
reqs += 1;
client.write_jsonrpc(req.method(), req.params());
}
}
for _ in 0..reqs {
let _ = client.read_latest_response();
}
let end = start.elapsed();
// part of the motivation of including this benchmark is to see how we perform
// with a fairly large number of documents in memory.
// make sure that's the case
let res = client.write_request(
"deno/virtualTextDocument",
json!({
"textDocument": {
"uri": "deno:/status.md"
}
}),
);
let re = lazy_regex::regex!(r"Documents in memory: (\d+)");
let res = res.as_str().unwrap().to_string();
assert!(res.starts_with("# Deno Language Server Status"));
let captures = re.captures(&res).unwrap();
let count = captures.get(1).unwrap().as_str().parse::<usize>().unwrap();
assert!(count > 1000, "count: {}", count);
client.shutdown();
end
}
/// A benchmark that opens a 8000+ line TypeScript document, adds a function to
/// the end of the document and does a level of hovering and gets quick fix
/// code actions.
fn bench_big_file_edits(deno_exe: &Path) -> Duration {
let mut client = LspClientBuilder::new()
.use_diagnostic_sync(false)
.deno_exe(deno_exe)
.build();
client.initialize_default();
2023-10-24 23:13:16 -04:00
client.change_configuration(json!({ "deno": { "enable": true } }));
client.write_notification(
"textDocument/didOpen",
json!({
"textDocument": {
"uri": "file:///testdata/db.ts",
"languageId": "typescript",
"version": 1,
"text": FIXTURE_DB_TS
}
}),
);
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
let messages: Vec<FixtureMessage> =
serde_json::from_slice(FIXTURE_DB_MESSAGES).unwrap();
for msg in messages {
match msg.fixture_type {
FixtureType::Action => {
client.write_request("textDocument/codeAction", msg.params);
}
FixtureType::Change => {
client.write_notification("textDocument/didChange", msg.params);
}
FixtureType::Completion => {
client.write_request("textDocument/completion", msg.params);
}
FixtureType::Highlight => {
client.write_request("textDocument/documentHighlight", msg.params);
}
FixtureType::Hover => {
client.write_request("textDocument/hover", msg.params);
}
}
}
client.write_request("shutdown", json!(null));
client.write_notification("exit", json!(null));
client.duration()
}
fn bench_code_lens(deno_exe: &Path) -> Duration {
let mut client = LspClientBuilder::new()
.use_diagnostic_sync(false)
.deno_exe(deno_exe)
.build();
client.initialize_default();
2023-10-24 23:13:16 -04:00
client.change_configuration(json!({ "deno": {
"enable": true,
"codeLens": {
"implementations": true,
"references": true,
"test": true,
},
} }));
client.write_notification(
"textDocument/didOpen",
json!({
"textDocument": {
"uri": "file:///testdata/code_lens.ts",
"languageId": "typescript",
"version": 1,
"text": FIXTURE_CODE_LENS_TS
}
}),
);
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
let res = client.write_request_with_res_as::<Vec<lsp::CodeLens>>(
"textDocument/codeLens",
json!({
"textDocument": {
"uri": "file:///testdata/code_lens.ts"
}
}),
);
assert!(!res.is_empty());
for code_lens in res {
client.write_request("codeLens/resolve", code_lens);
}
client.duration()
}
fn bench_find_replace(deno_exe: &Path) -> Duration {
let mut client = LspClientBuilder::new()
.use_diagnostic_sync(false)
.deno_exe(deno_exe)
.build();
client.initialize_default();
2023-10-24 23:13:16 -04:00
client.change_configuration(json!({ "deno": { "enable": true } }));
for i in 0..10 {
client.write_notification(
"textDocument/didOpen",
json!({
"textDocument": {
"uri": format!("file:///a/file_{i}.ts"),
"languageId": "typescript",
"version": 1,
"text": "console.log(\"000\");\n"
}
}),
);
}
for _ in 0..3 {
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
}
for i in 0..10 {
let file_name = format!("file:///a/file_{i}.ts");
client.write_notification(
"textDocument/didChange",
lsp::DidChangeTextDocumentParams {
text_document: lsp::VersionedTextDocumentIdentifier {
uri: Uri::from_str(&file_name).unwrap(),
version: 2,
},
content_changes: vec![lsp::TextDocumentContentChangeEvent {
range: Some(lsp::Range {
start: lsp::Position {
line: 0,
character: 13,
},
end: lsp::Position {
line: 0,
character: 16,
},
}),
range_length: None,
text: "111".to_string(),
}],
},
);
}
for i in 0..10 {
let file_name = format!("file:///a/file_{i}.ts");
client.write_request(
"textDocument/formatting",
lsp::DocumentFormattingParams {
text_document: lsp::TextDocumentIdentifier {
uri: Uri::from_str(&file_name).unwrap(),
},
options: lsp::FormattingOptions {
tab_size: 2,
insert_spaces: true,
..Default::default()
},
work_done_progress_params: Default::default(),
},
);
}
for _ in 0..3 {
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
}
client.write_request("shutdown", json!(null));
client.write_notification("exit", json!(null));
client.duration()
}
/// A test that starts up the LSP, opens a single line document, and exits.
fn bench_startup_shutdown(deno_exe: &Path) -> Duration {
let mut client = LspClientBuilder::new()
.use_diagnostic_sync(false)
.deno_exe(deno_exe)
.build();
client.initialize_default();
2023-10-24 23:13:16 -04:00
client.change_configuration(json!({ "deno": { "enable": true } }));
client.write_notification(
"textDocument/didOpen",
json!({
"textDocument": {
"uri": "file:///a/file.ts",
"languageId": "typescript",
"version": 1,
"text": "console.log(Deno.args);\n"
}
}),
);
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
let (method, _): (String, Option<Value>) = client.read_notification();
assert_eq!(method, "textDocument/publishDiagnostics");
client.write_request("shutdown", json!(null));
client.write_notification("exit", json!(null));
client.duration()
}
/// Generate benchmarks for the LSP server.
pub fn benchmarks(deno_exe: &Path) -> HashMap<String, i64> {
println!("-> Start benchmarking lsp");
let mut exec_times = HashMap::new();
println!(" - Simple Startup/Shutdown ");
let mut times = Vec::new();
for _ in 0..10 {
times.push(bench_startup_shutdown(deno_exe));
}
let mean =
(times.iter().sum::<Duration>() / times.len() as u32).as_millis() as i64;
println!(" ({} runs, mean: {}ms)", times.len(), mean);
exec_times.insert("startup_shutdown".to_string(), mean);
println!(" - Big Document/Several Edits ");
let mut times = Vec::new();
for _ in 0..5 {
times.push(bench_big_file_edits(deno_exe));
}
let mean =
(times.iter().sum::<Duration>() / times.len() as u32).as_millis() as i64;
println!(" ({} runs, mean: {}ms)", times.len(), mean);
exec_times.insert("big_file_edits".to_string(), mean);
println!(" - Find/Replace");
let mut times = Vec::new();
for _ in 0..10 {
times.push(bench_find_replace(deno_exe));
}
let mean =
(times.iter().sum::<Duration>() / times.len() as u32).as_millis() as i64;
println!(" ({} runs, mean: {}ms)", times.len(), mean);
exec_times.insert("find_replace".to_string(), mean);
println!(" - Code Lens");
let mut times = Vec::new();
for _ in 0..10 {
times.push(bench_code_lens(deno_exe));
}
let mean =
(times.iter().sum::<Duration>() / times.len() as u32).as_millis() as i64;
println!(" ({} runs, mean: {}ms)", times.len(), mean);
exec_times.insert("code_lens".to_string(), mean);
chore(lsp): Add benchmark for performance on a large real-world repo (#23395) This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload. The repo being benchmarked is [deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a file (to simulate an actual user interaction). The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement. Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new benchmark is the last one listed): **1.42.0** ```test Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 379ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1142ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 51ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 443ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 25121ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ``` **1.42.3** ```text Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 383ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1135ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 55ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 440ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 11675ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ```
2024-04-16 15:26:51 -04:00
println!(" - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation");
let mut times = Vec::new();
for _ in 0..5 {
times.push(bench_deco_apps_edits(deno_exe));
}
let mean =
(times.iter().sum::<Duration>() / times.len() as u32).as_millis() as i64;
println!(" ({} runs, mean: {}ms)", times.len(), mean);
exec_times.insert("deco_apps_edits_nav".to_string(), mean);
chore(lsp): Add benchmark for performance on a large real-world repo (#23395) This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload. The repo being benchmarked is [deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a file (to simulate an actual user interaction). The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement. Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new benchmark is the last one listed): **1.42.0** ```test Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 379ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1142ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 51ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 443ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 25121ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ``` **1.42.3** ```text Starting Deno benchmark -> Start benchmarking lsp - Simple Startup/Shutdown (10 runs, mean: 383ms) - Big Document/Several Edits (5 runs, mean: 1135ms) - Find/Replace (10 runs, mean: 55ms) - Code Lens (10 runs, mean: 440ms) - deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation (5 runs, mean: 11675ms) <- End benchmarking lsp ```
2024-04-16 15:26:51 -04:00
println!("<- End benchmarking lsp");
exec_times
}