mirror of
https://github.com/denoland/deno.git
synced 2024-11-24 15:19:26 -05:00
Fix typo in faqs.md (#9948)
Co-authored-by: Kitson Kelly <me@kitsonkelly.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca9cf77b0c
commit
4143d98981
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ Maybe. That is the best answer, we are afraid. For lots of reasons, Deno has
|
|||
chosen to have fully qualified module specifiers. In part this is because it
|
||||
treats TypeScript as a first class language. Also, Deno uses explicit module
|
||||
resolution, with no _magic_. This is effectively the same way browsers
|
||||
themselves work, thought they don't obviously support TypeScript directly. If
|
||||
the TypeScript modules use imports that don't have these design decisions in
|
||||
mind, they may not work under Deno.
|
||||
themselves work, though they don't obviously support TypeScript directly. If the
|
||||
TypeScript modules use imports that don't have these design decisions in mind,
|
||||
they may not work under Deno.
|
||||
|
||||
Also, in recent versions of Deno (starting with 1.5), we have started to use a
|
||||
Rust library to do transformations of TypeScript to JavaScript in certain
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue