1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/denoland/deno.git synced 2024-12-01 16:51:13 -05:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Raashid Anwar
9ede8d7b69
fix(bench): added group banner to bench output. (#21551)
Added group banner to bench output.

---------

Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
2023-12-17 22:57:14 +00:00
Matt Mastracci
4a9f429501
refactor(cli): refactor bench/test for future module changes (#21460)
Extracting some refactorings for the module work that will land in
https://github.com/denoland/deno_core/pull/359/
2023-12-05 09:26:06 -07:00
Nayeem Rahman
0606c11403
fix(bench): use total time when measuring wavg (#20862) 2023-10-10 14:40:36 +01:00
Nayeem Rahman
5dbf5c8293
fix(bench): explicit timers don't force high precision measurements (#20272)
Disables `BenchContext::start()` and `BenchContext::end()` for low
precision benchmarks (less than 0.01s per iteration). Prints a warning
when they are used in such benchmarks, suggesting to remove them.

```ts
Deno.bench("noop", { group: "noops" }, () => {});

Deno.bench("noop with start/end", { group: "noops" }, (b) => {
  b.start();
  b.end();
});
```

Before:
```
cpu: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-12900K
runtime: deno 1.36.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

file:///home/nayeem/projects/deno/temp3.ts
benchmark                    time (avg)        iter/s             (min … max)       p75       p99      p995
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------


noop                          2.63 ns/iter 380,674,131.4    (2.45 ns … 27.78 ns)   2.55 ns   4.03 ns   5.33 ns
noop with start and end     302.47 ns/iter   3,306,146.0     (200 ns … 151.2 µs)    300 ns    400 ns    400 ns

summary
  noop
   115.14x faster than noop with start and end
```

After:
```
cpu: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-12900K
runtime: deno 1.36.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

file:///home/nayeem/projects/deno/temp3.ts
benchmark                    time (avg)        iter/s             (min … max)       p75       p99      p995
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------


noop                          3.01 ns/iter 332,565,561.7    (2.73 ns … 29.54 ns)   2.93 ns   5.29 ns   7.45 ns
noop with start and end       7.73 ns/iter 129,291,091.5    (6.61 ns … 46.76 ns)   7.87 ns  13.12 ns  15.32 ns
Warning start() and end() calls in "noop with start and end" are ignored because it averages less than 0.01s per iteration. Remove them for better results.

summary
  noop
   2.57x faster than noop with start and end
```
2023-08-26 11:29:45 +02:00
Bartek Iwańczuk
a9951e360c
refactor(cli/tools): split bench into multiple modules (#19974)
I was asked to add "iter/s" to the benchmark output, before attempting
that I wanted to split this into multiple modules.
2023-07-28 11:27:10 -04:00