This adds `.code` attributes to errors returned by the op-layer, facilitating classifying OS errors and helping node-compat.
Similar to Node, these `.code` attributes are stringified names of unix ERRNOs, the mapping tables are generated by [tools/codegen_error_codes.js](https://gist.github.com/AaronO/dfa1106cc6c7e2a6ebe4dba9d5248858) and derived from libuv and rust's std internals
The initial implementation of `importScripts()` in #11338 used
`reqwest`'s default client to fetch HTTP scripts, which meant it would
not use certificates or other fetching configuration passed by command
line flags. This change fixes it.
A bug was fixed that could cause a hang when a method was
called on a TlsConn object that had thrown an exception earlier.
Additionally, a bug was fixed that caused TlsConn.write() to not
completely flush large buffers (>64kB) to the socket.
The public `TlsConn.handshake()` API is scheduled for inclusion in the
next minor release. See https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/12467.
`Window`'s `self` property and `DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope`'s `name`
property are defined as Web IDL read-only attributes with the
`[Replaceable]` extended attribute, meaning that their setter will
redefine the property as a data property with the set value, rather than
changing some internal state. Deno currently defines them as read-only
data properties instead.
Given that Web IDL requires all attributes to be accessor properties
rather than data properties, but Deno exposes almost all of those
properties as either read-only or writable data properties, it makes
sense to expose `[Replaceable]` properties as writable as well – as is
already the case with `WindowOrWorkerGlobalScope`'s `performance`
property.
This commit annotates errors returned from FS Deno APIs to include
paths that were passed to the API calls.
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
These are confusing. They say they are "for users that don't care about
permissions", but that isn't correct. `NoTimersPermissions` disables
permissions instead of enabling them.
I would argue that implementors should decide what permissions they want
themselves, and not take our opinionated permissions struct.
