This came up on Discord as a question so I thought it's worth adding a
hint for this as it might be a common pitfall.
---------
Signed-off-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds a suggestion with information and hint how
to resolve situation when user tries to run an npm package
with Node-API addons using global cache (which is currently not
supported).
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25974
```
$ cat exports_error.js
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
$ deno exports_error.js
error: Uncaught (in promise) ReferenceError: exports is not defined
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
^
at file:///exports_error.js:1:23
info: Deno doesn't support CommonJS modules without `.cjs` extension.
hint: Rewrite this module to ESM or change the file extension to `.cjs`.
```
Landing changes required for
https://github.com/denoland/deno_core/pull/359
We needed to update 99_main.js and a whole load of tests.
API changes:
- setPromiseRejectCallback becomes setUnhandledPromiseRejectionHandler.
The function is now called from eventLoopTick.
- The promiseRejectMacrotaskCallback no longer exists, as this is
automatically handled in eventLoopTick.
- ops.op_dispatch_exception now takes a second parameter: in_promise.
The preferred way to call this op is now reportUnhandledException or
reportUnhandledPromiseRejection.
These methods are confusing because the arguments are backwards. I feel
like they should have never been added to `Option<T>` and that clippy
should suggest rewriting to
`map(...).unwrap_or(...)`/`map(...).unwrap_or_else(|| ...)`
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1025
This commit renames "deno_core::InternalModuleLoader" to
"ExtModuleLoader" and changes the specifiers used by the
modules loaded from this loader to "ext:".
"internal:" scheme was really ambiguous and it's more characters than
"ext:", which should result in slightly smaller snapshot size.
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/18020
