The stderr stream from the LSP is consumed by a separate thread, so it
may not have processed the part we care about yet. Instead, wait until
you see the measure for the request you care about.
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read
https://docs.deno.com/runtime/manual/references/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23801
---------
Signed-off-by: Marvin Hagemeister <marvinhagemeister50@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
VScode will typically send a `textDocument/semanticTokens/full` request
followed by `textDocument/semanticTokens/range`, and occassionally
request semantic tokens even when we know nothing has changed. Semantic
tokens also get refreshed on each change. Computing semantic tokens is
relatively heavy in TSC, so we should avoid it as much as possible.
Caches the semantic tokens for open documents, to avoid making TSC do
unnecessary work. Results in a noticeable improvement in local
benchmarking
before:
```
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 383ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1079ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 59ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 440ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 9921ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
after:
```
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 395ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1024ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 56ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 438ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 8927ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read
https://docs.deno.com/runtime/manual/references/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23397
This PR directly addresses the issue raised in #23282 where Deno panics
if `deno coverage` is called with `--include` regex that returns no
matches.
I've opted not to change the return value of `collect_summary` for
simplicity and return an empty `HashMap` instead
Precursor to #23236
This implements the SNI features, but uses private symbols to avoid
exposing the functionality at this time. Note that to properly test this
feature, we need to add a way for `connectTls` to specify a hostname.
This is something that should be pushed into that API at a later time as
well.
```ts
Deno.test(
{ permissions: { net: true, read: true } },
async function listenResolver() {
let sniRequests = [];
const listener = Deno.listenTls({
hostname: "localhost",
port: 0,
[resolverSymbol]: (sni: string) => {
sniRequests.push(sni);
return {
cert,
key,
};
},
});
{
const conn = await Deno.connectTls({
hostname: "localhost",
[serverNameSymbol]: "server-1",
port: listener.addr.port,
});
const [_handshake, serverConn] = await Promise.all([
conn.handshake(),
listener.accept(),
]);
conn.close();
serverConn.close();
}
{
const conn = await Deno.connectTls({
hostname: "localhost",
[serverNameSymbol]: "server-2",
port: listener.addr.port,
});
const [_handshake, serverConn] = await Promise.all([
conn.handshake(),
listener.accept(),
]);
conn.close();
serverConn.close();
}
assertEquals(sniRequests, ["server-1", "server-2"]);
listener.close();
},
);
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
Moves sloppy import resolution from the loader to the resolver.
Also adds some test helper functions to make the lsp tests less verbose
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
1. Generally we should prefer to use the `log` crate.
2. I very often accidentally commit `eprintln`s.
When we should use `println` or `eprintln`, it's not too bad to be a bit
more verbose and ignore the lint rule.
This PR implements the changes we plan to make to `deno install` in deno
2.0.
- `deno install` without arguments caches dependencies from
`package.json` / `deno.json` and sets up the `node_modules` folder
- `deno install <pkg>` adds the package to the config file (either
`package.json` or `deno.json`), i.e. it aliases `deno add`
- `deno add` can also add deps to `package.json` (this is gated behind
`DENO_FUTURE` due to uncertainty around handling projects with both
`deno.json` and `package.json`)
- `deno install -g <bin>` installs a package as a globally available
binary (the same as `deno install <bin>` in 1.0)
---------
Co-authored-by: Nathan Whitaker <nathan@deno.com>
Fixes the `Debug Failure` errors described in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23643#issuecomment-2094552765 .
The issue here was that we were passing diagnostic codes as strings but
TSC expects the codes to be numbers. This resulted in some quick fixes
not working (as illustrated by the test added here which fails before
this PR).
The first commit is the actual fix. The rest are just test related.
A bunch of small things, mostly around timing and making sure the
jupyter kernel is actually running and ready to respond to requests. I
reproduced the flakiness by running a script to run a bunch of instances
of the test in parallel, where I could get failures consistently. After
this PR, I can't reproduce the flakiness locally which hopefully means
that applies to CI as well
