Allows writing named sub-tests. These are:
1. Filterable on the command line via `cargo test ...`
2. Run in parallel
3. Use a fresh temp and deno dir for each test (unlike steps)
This commit updates our testing npm registry to handle
additional `@denotest2` scope in addition to `@denotest`
scope. I might have to update it further in the future to handle
additional scopes, but it's good enough for now.
Part of #22607 (probably closes it, but I haven't done thorough testing)
Makes it so that `require.resolve` with `paths` specified will fallback
to using the global cache when the paths can't be found when using a
global cache (not when using a node_modules folder)
By default, `deno serve` will assign port 8000 (like `Deno.serve`).
Users may choose a different port using `--port`.
`deno serve /tmp/file.ts`
`server.ts`:
```ts
export default {
fetch(req) {
return new Response("hello world!\n");
},
};
```
This commit changes the workspace support to provide all workspace
members to be available as imports based on their names and versions.
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23343
This allows people to use imports like:
```ts
import "./app.css";
```
...with `deno check` in systems where there's a bundle step (ex. Vite).
This will still error when using it with `deno run` or if the referenced
file does not exist.
See test cases for behaviour.
I'm unsure whether we're planning to make the `Deno.FsFile` constructor
illegal or remove `FsFile` from the `Deno.*` namspace in Deno 2. Either
way, this PR works towards the former. I'll create a superceding PR if
the latter is planned instead.
Towards #23089
Unused locals and parameters don't make sense to surface in remote
modules. Additionally, fast check can cause these kind of diagnostics
when publishing, so they should be ignored.
Closes #22959
Fixes #23053.
Two small bugs here:
- the existing condition for printing out the group header was broken.
it worked in the reproducer (in the issue above) without filtering only
by accident, due to setting `self.has_ungrouped = true` once we see the
warmup bench. Knowing that we sort benchmarks to put ungrouped benches
first, there are only two cases: 1) we are starting the first group 2)
we are ending the previous group and starting a new group
- when you passed `--filter` we were applying that filter to the warmup
bench (which is not visible to users), so we suffered from jit bias if
you were filtering (unless your filter was `<warmup>`)
TLDR;
Running
```bash
deno bench main.js --filter="G"
```
```js
// main.js
Deno.bench({
group: "G1",
name: "G1-A",
fn() {},
});
Deno.bench({
group: "G1",
name: "G1-B",
fn() {},
});
```
Before this PR:
```
benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995
--------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
G1-A 303.52 ps/iter3,294,726,102.1 (254.2 ps … 7.8 ns) 287.5 ps 391.7 ps 437.5 ps
G1-B 3.8 ns/iter 263,360,635.9 (2.24 ns … 8.36 ns) 3.84 ns 4.73 ns 4.94 ns
summary
G1-A
12.51x faster than G1-B
```
After this PR:
```
benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995
--------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
group G1
G1-A 3.85 ns/iter 259,822,096.0 (2.42 ns … 9.03 ns) 3.83 ns 4.62 ns 4.83 ns
G1-B 3.84 ns/iter 260,458,274.5 (3.55 ns … 7.05 ns) 3.83 ns 4.45 ns 4.7 ns
summary
G1-B
1x faster than G1-A
```
