Two small changes:
- In our BYONM errors, suggest running `deno install` instead of `npm
install` if `DENO_FUTURE` is set
- Only emit warning about `deno install` changes if you do `deno install
<foo>` with deno_future unset
Fixes a regression introduced in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/24170, where we wouldn't actually
set up the node modules dir on `deno install` if there was an up to date
deno lockfile present.
Previously we were relying on the fact that resolving pending module
resolution called `cache_packages` (which sets up the node modules dir).
When pending resolutions were removed, and the `resolve_pending`
function with it, we also removed the `cache_packages` call needed to
set up node modules.
Fixes #23571.
Previously, we required a `deno.json` to be present (or the `--lock`
flag) in order for us to resolve a `deno.lock` file. This meant that if
you were using deno in an npm-first project deno wouldn't use a
lockfile.
Additionally, while I was fixing that, I discovered there were a couple
bugs keeping the future `install` command from using a lockfile.
With this PR, `install` will actually resolve the lockfile (or create
one if not present), and update it if it's not up-to-date. This also
speeds up `deno install`, as we can use the lockfile to skip work during
npm resolution.
This PR implements the changes we plan to make to `deno install` in deno
2.0.
- `deno install` without arguments caches dependencies from
`package.json` / `deno.json` and sets up the `node_modules` folder
- `deno install <pkg>` adds the package to the config file (either
`package.json` or `deno.json`), i.e. it aliases `deno add`
- `deno add` can also add deps to `package.json` (this is gated behind
`DENO_FUTURE` due to uncertainty around handling projects with both
`deno.json` and `package.json`)
- `deno install -g <bin>` installs a package as a globally available
binary (the same as `deno install <bin>` in 1.0)
---------
Co-authored-by: Nathan Whitaker <nathan@deno.com>
