When `DENO_FUTURE=1` env var is present, then BYONM
("bring your own node_modules") is enabled by default.
That means that is there's a `package.json` present, users
are expected to explicitly install dependencies from that file.
Towards https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23151
Was doing a bit of debugging on why some stuff is not working in a
personal project and ran a quick debug profile and saw it cloning the
pkg json a lot. We should put this in an Rc.
Unused locals and parameters don't make sense to surface in remote
modules. Additionally, fast check can cause these kind of diagnostics
when publishing, so they should be ignored.
Closes #22959
Was investigating a separate stack overflow (that I've now found in the
node resolution code) and came across this. We should avoid recursion
(this is very old code).
This PR introduces the ability to exclude certain paths from the file watcher
in Deno. This is particularly useful when running scripts in watch mode,
as it allows developers to prevent unnecessary restarts when changes are
made to files that do not affect the running script, or when executing
scripts that generate new files which results in an infinite restart
loop.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
In preparation for upcoming changes to `deno install` in Deno 2.
If `-g` or `--global` flag is not provided a warning will be emitted:
```
⚠️ `deno install` behavior will change in Deno 2. To preserve the current behavior use `-g` or `--global` flag.
```
The same will happen for `deno uninstall` - unless `-g`/`--global` flag
is provided
a warning will be emitted.
Towards https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23062
---------
Signed-off-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit changes "deno init" subcommand to use "jsr:" specifier for
standard library "assert" module. It is unversioned, but we will change
it to `@^1` once `@std/assert` release version 1.0.
This allows us to start decoupling `deno` and `deno_std` release. The
release scripts have been updated to take that into account.
Fixes #23053.
Two small bugs here:
- the existing condition for printing out the group header was broken.
it worked in the reproducer (in the issue above) without filtering only
by accident, due to setting `self.has_ungrouped = true` once we see the
warmup bench. Knowing that we sort benchmarks to put ungrouped benches
first, there are only two cases: 1) we are starting the first group 2)
we are ending the previous group and starting a new group
- when you passed `--filter` we were applying that filter to the warmup
bench (which is not visible to users), so we suffered from jit bias if
you were filtering (unless your filter was `<warmup>`)
TLDR;
Running
```bash
deno bench main.js --filter="G"
```
```js
// main.js
Deno.bench({
group: "G1",
name: "G1-A",
fn() {},
});
Deno.bench({
group: "G1",
name: "G1-B",
fn() {},
});
```
Before this PR:
```
benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995
--------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
G1-A 303.52 ps/iter3,294,726,102.1 (254.2 ps … 7.8 ns) 287.5 ps 391.7 ps 437.5 ps
G1-B 3.8 ns/iter 263,360,635.9 (2.24 ns … 8.36 ns) 3.84 ns 4.73 ns 4.94 ns
summary
G1-A
12.51x faster than G1-B
```
After this PR:
```
benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995
--------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
group G1
G1-A 3.85 ns/iter 259,822,096.0 (2.42 ns … 9.03 ns) 3.83 ns 4.62 ns 4.83 ns
G1-B 3.84 ns/iter 260,458,274.5 (3.55 ns … 7.05 ns) 3.83 ns 4.45 ns 4.7 ns
summary
G1-B
1x faster than G1-A
```
Before this PR, we didn't have any integration tests set up for the
`jupyter` subcommand.
This PR adds a basic jupyter client and helpers for writing integration
tests for the jupyter kernel. A lot of the code here is boilerplate,
mainly around the message format for jupyter.
This also adds a few basic integration tests, most notably for
requesting execution of a snippet of code and getting the correct
results.
This patch gets JUnit reporter to output more detailed information for
test steps (subtests).
## Issue with previous implementation
In the previous implementation, the test hierarchy was represented using
several XML tags like the following:
- `<testsuites>` corresponds to the entire test (one execution of `deno
test` has exactly one `<testsuites>` tag)
- `<testsuite>` corresponds to one file, such as `main_test.ts`
- `<testcase>` corresponds to one `Deno.test(...)`
- `<property>` corresponds to one `t.step(...)`
This structure describes the test layers but one problem is that
`<property>` tag is used for any use cases so some tools that can ingest
a JUnit XML file might not be able to interpret `<property>` as
subtests.
## How other tools address it
Some of the testing frameworks in the ecosystem address this issue by
fitting subtests into the `<testcase>` layer. For instance, take a look
at the following Go test file:
```go
package main_test
import "testing"
func TestMain(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("child 1", func(t *testing.T) {
// OK
})
t.Run("child 2", func(t *testing.T) {
// Error
t.Fatal("error")
})
}
```
Running [gotestsum], we can get the output like this:
```xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<testsuites tests="3" failures="2" errors="0" time="1.013694">
<testsuite tests="3" failures="2" time="0.510000" name="example/gosumtest" timestamp="2024-03-11T12:26:39+09:00">
<properties>
<property name="go.version" value="go1.22.1 darwin/arm64"></property>
</properties>
<testcase classname="example/gosumtest" name="TestMain/child_2" time="0.000000">
<failure message="Failed" type="">=== RUN TestMain/child_2
 main_test.go:12: error
--- FAIL: TestMain/child_2 (0.00s)
</failure>
</testcase>
<testcase classname="example/gosumtest" name="TestMain" time="0.000000">
<failure message="Failed" type="">=== RUN TestMain
--- FAIL: TestMain (0.00s)
</failure>
</testcase>
<testcase classname="example/gosumtest" name="TestMain/child_1" time="0.000000"></testcase>
</testsuite>
</testsuites>
```
This output shows that nested test cases are squashed into the
`<testcase>` layer by treating them as the same layer as their parent,
`TestMain`. We can still distinguish nested ones by their `name`
attributes that look like `TestMain/<subtest_name>`.
As described in #22795, [vitest] solves the issue in the same way as
[gotestsum].
One downside of this would be that one test failure that happens in a
nested test case will end up being counted multiple times, because not
only the subtest but also its wrapping container(s) are considered to be
failures. In fact, in the [gotestsum] output above, `TestMain/child_2`
failed (which is totally expected) while its parent, `TestMain`, was
also counted as failure. As
https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/20273#discussion_r1307558757
pointed out, there is a test runner that offers flexibility to prevent
this, but I personally don't think the "duplicate failure count" issue
is a big deal.
## How to fix the issue in this patch
This patch fixes the issue with the same approach as [gotestsum] and
[vitest].
More specifically, nested test cases are put into the `<testcase>` level
and their names are now represented as squashed test names concatenated
by `>` (e.g. `parent 2 > child 1 > grandchild 1`). This change also
allows us to put a detailed error message as `<failure>` tag within the
`<testcase>` tag, which should be handled nicely by third-party tools
supporting JUnit XML.
## Extra fix
Also, file paths embedded into XML outputs are changed from absolute
path to relative path, which is helpful when running the test suites in
several different environments like CI.
Resolves #22795
[gotestsum]: https://github.com/gotestyourself/gotestsum
[vitest]: https://vitest.dev/
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This has been incorrect since the function adopted its (more intuitive)
current behavior in 9268df5f3. The same behavior change was backported
to v1.39.3 in 87e954f54.
Fixes #22941.
In that case, the only file with coverage was the `test.ts` file. The
coverage reporter filters out test files before compiling its report, so
after filtering we were left with an empty set of files. Later on it's
assumed that there is at least 1 file to be reported on, and we panic.
Instead of panicking, just issue an error after filtering.
