1. Respects the formatting of the file (ex. keeps four space indents or
tabs).
2. Handles editing of comments.
3. Handles trailing commas.
4. Code is easier to maintain.
This PR is part of #22907
---------
Signed-off-by: HasanAlrimawi <141642411+HasanAlrimawi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Adds much better support for the unstable Deno workspaces as well as
support for npm workspaces. npm workspaces is still lacking in that we
only install packages into the root node_modules folder. We'll make it
smarter over time in order for it to figure out when to add node_modules
folders within packages.
This includes a breaking change in config file resolution where we stop
searching for config files on the first found package.json unless it's
in a workspace. For the previous behaviour, the root deno.json needs to
be updated to be a workspace by adding `"workspace":
["./path-to-pkg-json-folder-goes-here"]`. See details in
https://github.com/denoland/deno_config/pull/66
Closes #24340
Closes #24159
Closes #24161
Closes #22020
Closes #18546
Closes #16106
Closes #24160
This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger
repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload.
The repo being benchmarked is
[deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored
along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its
fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual
requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a
file (to simulate an actual user interaction).
The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures
how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The
improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with
larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement.
Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new
benchmark is the last one listed):
**1.42.0**
```test
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 379ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1142ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 51ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 443ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 25121ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
**1.42.3**
```text
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 383ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1135ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 55ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 440ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 11675ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
The `tools/node_compat/node` submodule has been moved to
`tests/node_compat/runner/suite` and the remaining files within
`tools/node_compat` to `tests/node_compat/runner`.
Most of the changes are of the header within `tests/node_compat/test`
files. The `setup` and `test` tasks within `tests/node_comapt` execute
successfully.
Towards #22525
CC @mmastrac
Updates dependent crates which includes an investigation fix by @irbull
in Deno's LSP when linting code. Huge thanks to Ian for tracking down
this issue.
Also includes Divy's deno_graph executor change, which reduces memory
usage when loading jsr specifiers and makes them faster.
Co-authored-by: irbull <irbull@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: littledivy <littledivy@users.noreply.github.com>
Note: tests are not the only part of the codebase that uses `std`. Other
parts, like `tools/`, do too. So, it could be argued that this is a
little misleading. Either way, I'm doing this as discussed with
@mmastrac.
This looks like a massive PR, but it's only a move from cli/tests ->
tests, and updates of relative paths for files.
This is the first step towards aggregate all of the integration test
files under tests/, which will lead to a set of integration tests that
can run without the CLI binary being built.
While we could leave these tests under `cli`, it would require us to
keep a more complex directory structure for the various test runners. In
addition, we have a lot of complexity to ignore various test files in
the `cli` project itself (cargo publish exclusion rules, autotests =
false, etc).
And finally, the `tests/` folder will eventually house the `test_ffi`,
`test_napi` and other testing code, reducing the size of the root repo
directory.
For easier review, the extremely large and noisy "move" is in the first
commit (with no changes -- just a move), while the remainder of the
changes to actual files is in the second commit.
