Enhanced warning message for --env flag with run and eval subcommands.
The commit is specifically made to address issue #23674 by improving the
warning messages that appear when using the --env flag with run or eval
subcommands in the following scenarios:
1. Missing environment file.
2. Incorrect syntax in the environment file content.
**Changes made**
- Distinguishes between cases of missing environment file and wrong
syntax in the environment file content.
- Shows a concise warning message to convey the case/issue occurred.
**Code changes & enhancements**
- Implemented a match statement to handle different types of errors
received while getting and parsing the file content to display a concise
warning message, rather than simple error check and then displaying the
same warning message for whatever the type of error is.
- Updated the related existing tests to reflect the new warning
messages.
- Added two test cases to cover the wrong environment file content
syntax with both run and eval subcommands.
**Impact**
The use of --env flag with both run/eval would be more user-friendly as
it gives a precise description of what is not right when using
incorrectly.
If you could give it a look, @dsherret , I appreciate your feedback on
these changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This looks like a massive PR, but it's only a move from cli/tests ->
tests, and updates of relative paths for files.
This is the first step towards aggregate all of the integration test
files under tests/, which will lead to a set of integration tests that
can run without the CLI binary being built.
While we could leave these tests under `cli`, it would require us to
keep a more complex directory structure for the various test runners. In
addition, we have a lot of complexity to ignore various test files in
the `cli` project itself (cargo publish exclusion rules, autotests =
false, etc).
And finally, the `tests/` folder will eventually house the `test_ffi`,
`test_napi` and other testing code, reducing the size of the root repo
directory.
For easier review, the extremely large and noisy "move" is in the first
commit (with no changes -- just a move), while the remainder of the
changes to actual files is in the second commit.
