This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.44.1
Co-authored-by: devsnek <devsnek@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
Introduces a `SyncReadAsyncWriteLock` to make it harder to write to the
npm resolution without first waiting async in a queue. For the npm
resolution, reading synchronously is fine, but when updating, someone
should wait async, clone the data, then write the data at the end back.
Factoring out `dlint` upgrade from
https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/24034 as it
requires us to change the lint step on mac to use ARM runners.
---------
Co-authored-by: Luca Casonato <hello@lcas.dev>
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@users.noreply.github.com>
The PEM file specified by DENO_CERT can contain multiple certificates
13924fdb1b/cli/args/mod.rs (L722-L742)
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kohn <andreas.kohn@gmail.com>
Fixes #24012.
In the case of multiple packages providing a binary with a same name, we
were basically leaving the results undefined (since we set up things in
parallel, and whichever got set up first won). In addition, we were
warning about these cases, even though it's a situation that's expected
to occur.
Instead, in the case of a collision in the binary names, we prefer the
binary provided by the package with the least depth in the dependency
tree.
While I was at it, I also took moved more code to `bin_entries.rs` since
it was starting to get a bit cluttered.
This commits adds the ability to set a would-be exit code
for the Deno process without forcing an immediate exit,
through the new `Deno.exitCode` API.
- **Implements `Deno.exitCode` getter and setter**: Adds support for
setting
and retrieving a would-be exit code via `Deno.exitCode`.
This allows for asynchronous cleanup before process termination
without immediately exiting.
- **Ensures type safety**: The setter for `Deno.exitCode` validates that
the provided value is a number, throwing a TypeError if not, to ensure
that
only valid exit codes are set.
Closes to #23605
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Brings in:
* More fully typed structures (for when we get to implementing more)
* `with_metadata`, `with_buffers`, etc. from
https://github.com/runtimed/runtimed/pull/99
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
In https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/23955 we changed the sqlite db
journal mode to WAL. This causes issues when someone is running an old
version of Deno using TRUNCATE and a new version because the two fight
against each other.
The same issue in two different places - doing blocking FS work in an
async task, limiting the amount of work that happens concurrently.
- When setting up node_modules, where we try to set up entries
concurrently but were blocking other tasks from actually running.
- When loading package info from the npm registry file cache, loading
and deserializing is expensive and prevents concurrency. This was
especially noticeable when loading an npm resolution snapshot from a
lockfile (`snapshot_from_lockfile` in `deno_npm`).
Installing deps in `deno-docs`:
```
❯ hyperfine -i -p 'rm -rf node_modules/' '../d7/deno-main i' '../d7/target/release/deno i'
Benchmark 1: ../d7/deno-main i
Time (mean ± σ): 2.193 s ± 0.027 s [User: 0.589 s, System: 1.033 s]
Range (min … max): 2.151 s … 2.242 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: ../d7/target/release/deno i
Time (mean ± σ): 1.597 s ± 0.021 s [User: 0.977 s, System: 1.337 s]
Range (min … max): 1.550 s … 1.627 s 10 runs
Summary
../d7/target/release/deno i ran
1.37 ± 0.02 times faster than ../d7/deno-main i
```
Caching `npm:@11ty/eleventy`:
```
❯ hyperfine -i -p 'rm -rf node_modules/' --warmup 5 '../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy' '../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy'
Benchmark 1: ../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 129.9 ms ± 2.2 ms [User: 27.5 ms, System: 101.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 127.5 ms … 135.8 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: ../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 100.6 ms ± 1.3 ms [User: 38.8 ms, System: 233.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 99.3 ms … 103.2 ms 10 runs
Summary
../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy ran
1.29 ± 0.03 times faster than ../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
```
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
Hard linking (`linkat`) is ridiculously slow on mac. `copyfile` is
better, but what's even faster is `clonefile`. It doesn't have the space
savings that comes with hardlinking, but the performance difference is
worth it imo.
```
❯ hyperfine -i -p 'rm -rf node_modules/' '../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy' 'deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy'
Benchmark 1: ../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 115.4 ms ± 1.2 ms [User: 27.2 ms, System: 87.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 113.7 ms … 117.5 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 619.3 ms ± 6.4 ms [User: 34.3 ms, System: 575.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 612.2 ms … 633.3 ms 10 runs
Summary
../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy ran
5.37 ± 0.08 times faster than deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
```
# Summary
This PR resolves about the issue.
fixes #10810
And the formerly context is in the PR.
#22582
Here is an expected behaviour example with this change.
- 🦕.test.ts
```ts
import { assertEquals } from "https://deno.land/std@0.215.0/assert/mod.ts";
Deno.test("example test", () => {
assertEquals("🍋", "🦕");
});
```
The mixed `number | bigint` representation was useful optimization for
pointers. Now, pointers are represented as V8 externals. As part of the
FFI stabilization effort we want to make `bigint` the only
representation for `u64` and `i64`.
BigInt representation performance is almost on par with mixed
representation with the added benefit that its less confusing and users
don't need manual checks and conversions for doing operations on the
value.
```
cpu: AMD Ryzen 5 7530U with Radeon Graphics
runtime: deno 1.43.6+92a8d09 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
file:///home/divy/gh/ffi/main.ts
benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
nop 4.01 ns/iter 249,533,690.5 (3.97 ns … 10.8 ns) 3.97 ns 4.36 ns 9.03 ns
ret bigint 7.74 ns/iter 129,127,186.8 (7.72 ns … 10.46 ns) 7.72 ns 8.11 ns 8.82 ns
ret i32 7.81 ns/iter 128,087,100.5 (7.77 ns … 12.72 ns) 7.78 ns 8.57 ns 9.75 ns
ret bigint (add op) 15.02 ns/iter 66,588,253.2 (14.64 ns … 24.99 ns) 14.76 ns 19.13 ns 19.44 ns
ret i32 (add op) 12.02 ns/iter 83,209,131.8 (11.95 ns … 18.18 ns) 11.98 ns 13.11 ns 14.5 ns
```
Enhanced warning message for --env flag with run and eval subcommands.
The commit is specifically made to address issue #23674 by improving the
warning messages that appear when using the --env flag with run or eval
subcommands in the following scenarios:
1. Missing environment file.
2. Incorrect syntax in the environment file content.
**Changes made**
- Distinguishes between cases of missing environment file and wrong
syntax in the environment file content.
- Shows a concise warning message to convey the case/issue occurred.
**Code changes & enhancements**
- Implemented a match statement to handle different types of errors
received while getting and parsing the file content to display a concise
warning message, rather than simple error check and then displaying the
same warning message for whatever the type of error is.
- Updated the related existing tests to reflect the new warning
messages.
- Added two test cases to cover the wrong environment file content
syntax with both run and eval subcommands.
**Impact**
The use of --env flag with both run/eval would be more user-friendly as
it gives a precise description of what is not right when using
incorrectly.
If you could give it a look, @dsherret , I appreciate your feedback on
these changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
