Some `deno_std` tests were failing to print output that was resolved
after the last test finished. In addition, output printed before tests
began would sometimes appear above the "running X tests ..." line, and
sometimes below it depending on timing.
We now guarantee that all output is flushed before and after tests run,
making the output consistent.
Pre-test and post-test output are captured in `------ pre-test output
------` and `------ post-test output ------` blocks to differentiate
them from the regular output blocks.
Here's an example of a test (that is much noisier than normal, but an
example of what the output will look like):
```
Check ./load_unload.ts
------- pre-test output -------
load
----- output end -----
running 1 test from ./load_unload.ts
test ...
------- output -------
test
----- output end -----
test ... ok ([WILDCARD])
------- post-test output -------
unload
----- output end -----
```
As we add tracing to more types of runtime activity, `--trace-ops` is
less useful of a name. `--trace-leaks` better reflects that this feature
traces both ops and timers, and will eventually trace resource opening
as well.
This keeps `--trace-ops` as an alias for `--trace-leaks`, but prints a
warning to the console suggesting migration to `--trace-leaks`.
One test continues to use `--trace-ops` to test the deprecation warning.
---------
Signed-off-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
The format of the sanitizers will change a little bit:
- If multiple async ops leak and traces are on, we repeat the async op
header once per stack trace.
- All leaks are aggregated under a "Leaks detected:" banner as the new
timers are eventually going to be added, and these are neither ops nor
resources.
- `1 async op` is now `An async op`
- If ops and resources leak, we show both (rather than op leaks masking
resources)
Follow-on to https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/22226
Note: tests are not the only part of the codebase that uses `std`. Other
parts, like `tools/`, do too. So, it could be argued that this is a
little misleading. Either way, I'm doing this as discussed with
@mmastrac.
This looks like a massive PR, but it's only a move from cli/tests ->
tests, and updates of relative paths for files.
This is the first step towards aggregate all of the integration test
files under tests/, which will lead to a set of integration tests that
can run without the CLI binary being built.
While we could leave these tests under `cli`, it would require us to
keep a more complex directory structure for the various test runners. In
addition, we have a lot of complexity to ignore various test files in
the `cli` project itself (cargo publish exclusion rules, autotests =
false, etc).
And finally, the `tests/` folder will eventually house the `test_ffi`,
`test_napi` and other testing code, reducing the size of the root repo
directory.
For easier review, the extremely large and noisy "move" is in the first
commit (with no changes -- just a move), while the remainder of the
changes to actual files is in the second commit.
