<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
---------
Signed-off-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
Adds performance measurements for all ops used by the LSP. Also changes
output of "Language server status" page to include more precise
information.
Current suspicion is that computing "script version" takes a long time
for some users.
Adds an `--unstable-sloppy-imports` flag which supports the
following for `file:` specifiers:
* Allows writing `./mod` in a specifier to do extension probing.
- ex. `import { Example } from "./example"` instead of `import { Example
} from "./example.ts"`
* Allows writing `./routes` to do directory extension probing for files
like `./routes/index.ts`
* Allows writing `./mod.js` for *mod.ts* files.
This functionality is **NOT RECOMMENDED** for general use with Deno:
1. It's not as optimal for perf:
https://marvinh.dev/blog/speeding-up-javascript-ecosystem-part-2/
1. It makes tooling in the ecosystem more complex in order to have to
understand this.
1. The "Deno way" is to be explicit about what you're doing. It's better
in the long run.
1. It doesn't work if published to the Deno registry because doing stuff
like extension probing with remote specifiers would be incredibly slow.
This is instead only recommended to help with migrating existing
projects to Deno. For example, it's very useful for getting CJS projects
written with import/export declaration working in Deno without modifying
module specifiers and for supporting TS ESM projects written with
`./mod.js` specifiers.
This feature will output warnings to guide the user towards correcting
their specifiers. Additionally, quick fixes are provided in the LSP to
update these specifiers:
This commit changes LSP log names by prefixing them, we now have these
prefixes:
- `lsp.*` - requests coming from the client
- `tsc.request.*` - requests coming from clients that are routed to TSC
- `tsc.op.*` - ops called by the TS host
- `tsc.host.*` - requests that call JavaScript runtime that runs
TypeScript compiler host
Additionall `Performance::mark` was split into `Performance::mark` and
`Performance::mark_with_args` to reduce verbosity of code and logs.
When sending configuration requests to the client, reads `javascript`
and `typescript` sections in addition to `deno`.
The LSP's initialization options now accepts `javascript` and
`typescript` namespaces.
Give auto-import completion entries a sort-text suffix depending on if
the specifier parses as a URL. This will favour relative and bare
(likely import-mapped) specifiers.
This commit changes ordering of quickfix actions, by sorting them in
following order:
- TSC fixes
- Deno fixes
- deno_lint fixes
Co-authored-by: Nayeem Rahman <nayeemrmn99@gmail.com>
Fixes #19802.
Properly respect when clients do not have the `workspace/configuration`
capability, a.k.a. when an editor cannot provide scoped settings on
request from the LSP.
- Fix one spot where we weren't checking for the capability before
sending this request.
- For `enablePaths`, fall back to the settings passed in the
initialization options in more cases.
- Respect the `workspace/configuration` capability in the test harness
client.
See:
https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#workspace_configuration.
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
As the title.
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
