`deno bundle` now produces:
```
error: ⚠️ `deno bundle` was removed in Deno 2.
See the Deno 1.x to 2.x Migration Guide for migration instructions: https://docs.deno.com/runtime/manual/advanced/migrate_deprecations
```
`deno bundle --help` now produces:
```
⚠️ `deno bundle` was removed in Deno 2.
See the Deno 1.x to 2.x Migration Guide for migration instructions: https://docs.deno.com/runtime/manual/advanced/migrate_deprecations
Usage: deno bundle [OPTIONS]
Options:
-q, --quiet Suppress diagnostic output
--unstable Enable all unstable features and APIs. Instead of using this flag, consider enabling individual unstable features
To view the list of individual unstable feature flags, run this command again with --help=unstable
```
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read
https://docs.deno.com/runtime/manual/references/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
This PR removes the use of the custom `utc_now` function in favor of the
`chrono` implementation. It resolves #22864.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
1. Generally we should prefer to use the `log` crate.
2. I very often accidentally commit `eprintln`s.
When we should use `println` or `eprintln`, it's not too bad to be a bit
more verbose and ignore the lint rule.
This PR adds a benchmark intended to measure how the LSP handles larger
repos, as well as its performance on a more realistic workload.
The repo being benchmarked is
[deco-cx/apps](https://github.com/deco-cx/apps) which has been vendored
along with its dependencies. It's included as a git submodule as its
fairly large. The LSP requests used in the benchmark are the actual
requests sent by VSCode as I opened, modified, and navigated around a
file (to simulate an actual user interaction).
The main motivation is to have a more realistic benchmark that measures
how we do with a large number of files and dependencies. The
improvements made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 mostly improved performance with
larger repos, so none of our existing benchmarks showed an improvement.
Here are the results for the changes made from 1.42 to 1.42.3 (the new
benchmark is the last one listed):
**1.42.0**
```test
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 379ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1142ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 51ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 443ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 25121ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
**1.42.3**
```text
Starting Deno benchmark
-> Start benchmarking lsp
- Simple Startup/Shutdown
(10 runs, mean: 383ms)
- Big Document/Several Edits
(5 runs, mean: 1135ms)
- Find/Replace
(10 runs, mean: 55ms)
- Code Lens
(10 runs, mean: 440ms)
- deco-cx/apps Multiple Edits + Navigation
(5 runs, mean: 11675ms)
<- End benchmarking lsp
```
Note: tests are not the only part of the codebase that uses `std`. Other
parts, like `tools/`, do too. So, it could be argued that this is a
little misleading. Either way, I'm doing this as discussed with
@mmastrac.
This looks like a massive PR, but it's only a move from cli/tests ->
tests, and updates of relative paths for files.
This is the first step towards aggregate all of the integration test
files under tests/, which will lead to a set of integration tests that
can run without the CLI binary being built.
While we could leave these tests under `cli`, it would require us to
keep a more complex directory structure for the various test runners. In
addition, we have a lot of complexity to ignore various test files in
the `cli` project itself (cargo publish exclusion rules, autotests =
false, etc).
And finally, the `tests/` folder will eventually house the `test_ffi`,
`test_napi` and other testing code, reducing the size of the root repo
directory.
For easier review, the extremely large and noisy "move" is in the first
commit (with no changes -- just a move), while the remainder of the
changes to actual files is in the second commit.
Chrono's `clock` feature pulls in `iana-time-zone` which links to macOS
core_foundation. This PR itself is not enough to get rid of
CoreFoundation. Removal depends on getting rid of security framework,
see #18071
denort is an optimization to "deno compile" to produce slightly smaller
output. It's a decent idea, but causes a lot of negative side-effects:
- Deno's link time is a source of constant agony both locally and in CI,
denort doubles link time.
- The release process is a long and arduous undertaking with many manual
steps. denort necessitates an additional manual zip + upload from M1
apple computers.
- The "deno compile" interface is complicated with the "--lite" option.
This is confusing for uses ("why wouldn't you want lite?").
The benefits of this feature do not outweigh the negatives. We must find
a different approach to optimizing "deno compile" output.
This commit rewrites "JsRuntime::poll" function to fix a corner case that
might caused "overflown_response" to be overwritten by other overflown response.
The logic has been changed to allow returning multiple overflown response
alongside responses from shared queue.
