We didn't honour the `position` options of `fd.read` and `fd.write`
because we checked if the buffer is of type `Buffer` instead of just
`Uint8Array`. Node does the latter. In doing so I noticed that the file
handle id was written to a public property which it definitely shouldn't
be. This was probably a typo.
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/23707
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
The FileHandle class has many missing methods compared to node.
Add these.
## WHAT
- Add close method
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
Node's fs/promises includes a FileHandle class, but deno does not. The
open function in Node's fs/promises returns a FileHandle, which provides
an IO interface to the file. However, deno's open function returns a
resource id.
### deno
```js
> const fs = await import("node:fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./README.md");
undefined
> file3
3
> file3.read
undefined
Node:
```
### Node
```js
> const fs = await import("fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./tests/e2e_unit/testdata/file.txt");
undefined
> file3
FileHandle {
_events: [Object: null prototype] {},
_eventsCount: 0,
_maxListeners: undefined,
close: [Function: close],
[Symbol(kCapture)]: false,
[Symbol(kHandle)]: FileHandle {},
[Symbol(kFd)]: 24,
[Symbol(kRefs)]: 1,
[Symbol(kClosePromise)]: null
}
> file3.read
[Function: read]
```
To be compatible with Node, deno's open function should also return a
FileHandle.
## WHAT
I have implemented the first step in adding a FileHandle.
- Changed the return value of the open function to a FileHandle object
- Implemented the readFile method in FileHandle
- Add test code
## What to do next
This PR is the first step in adding a FileHandle, and there are things
that should be done next.
- Add functionality equivalent to Node's FileHandle to FileHandle
(currently there is only readFile)
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
