This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 2.0.1
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Testing once again if the crates are being properly released.
---------
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Test run before Deno 2.0 release to make sure that the publishing
process passes correctly.
---------
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.45.3
---------
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Adds support for running npm package lifecycle scripts, opted into via a
new `--allow-scripts` flag.
With this PR, when running `deno cache` (or `DENO_FUTURE=1 deno
install`) you can specify the `--allow-scripts=pkg1,pkg2` flag to run
lifecycle scripts attached to the given packages.
Note at the moment this only works when `nodeModulesDir` is true (using
the local resolver).
When a package with un-run lifecycle scripts is encountered, we emit a
warning suggesting things may not work and to try running lifecycle
scripts. Additionally, if a package script implicitly requires
`node-gyp` and it's not found on the system, we emit a warning.
Extra things in this PR:
- Extracted out bits of `task.rs` into a separate module for reuse
- Added a couple fields to `process.config` in order to support
`node-gyp` (it relies on a few variables being there)
- Drive by fix to downloading new npm packages to test registry
---
TODO:
- [x] validation for allow-scripts args (make sure it looks like an npm
package)
- [x] make allow-scripts matching smarter
- [ ] figure out what issues this closes
---
Review notes:
- This adds a bunch of deps to our test registry due to using
`node-gyp`, so it's pretty noisy
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.44.3
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.44.1
Co-authored-by: devsnek <devsnek@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
**THIS PR HAS GIT CONFLICTS THAT MUST BE RESOLVED**
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.43.2
Please ensure:
- [x] Everything looks ok in the PR
- [x] The release has been published
To make edits to this PR:
```shell
git fetch upstream forward_v1.43.2 && git checkout -b forward_v1.43.2 upstream/forward_v1.43.2
```
Don't need this PR? Close it.
cc @nathanwhit
Co-authored-by: nathanwhit <nathanwhit@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Whitaker <nathan@deno.com>
Issue https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/22222
This PR moves `runtime/permissions` code to a upstream crate called
`deno_permissions`. The `deno_permissions::PermissionsContainer` is put
into the OpState and can be used instead of the current trait-based
permissions system.
For this PR, I've migrated `deno_fetch` to the new crate but kept the
rest of the trait-based system as a wrapper of `deno_permissions` crate.
Doing the migration all at once is error prone and hard to review.
Comparing incremental compile times for `ext/fetch` on Mac M1:
| profile | `cargo build --bin deno` | `cargo plonk build --bin deno` |
| --------- | ------------- | ------------------- |
| `debug` | 20 s | 0.8s |
| `release` | 4 mins 12 s | 1.4s |
