This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 2.1.2
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 2.0.6
Signed-off-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 2.0.2
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 2.0.1
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Testing once again if the crates are being properly released.
---------
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Test run before Deno 2.0 release to make sure that the publishing
process passes correctly.
---------
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.45.3
---------
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.44.3
Co-authored-by: bartlomieju <bartlomieju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Also removes permissions being passed in for node resolution. It was
completely useless because we only checked it for reading package.json
files, but Deno reading package.json files for resolution is perfectly
fine.
My guess is this is also a perf improvement because Deno is doing less
work.
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.44.1
Co-authored-by: devsnek <devsnek@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
1. Generally we should prefer to use the `log` crate.
2. I very often accidentally commit `eprintln`s.
When we should use `println` or `eprintln`, it's not too bad to be a bit
more verbose and ignore the lint rule.
**THIS PR HAS GIT CONFLICTS THAT MUST BE RESOLVED**
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.43.2
Please ensure:
- [x] Everything looks ok in the PR
- [x] The release has been published
To make edits to this PR:
```shell
git fetch upstream forward_v1.43.2 && git checkout -b forward_v1.43.2 upstream/forward_v1.43.2
```
Don't need this PR? Close it.
cc @nathanwhit
Co-authored-by: nathanwhit <nathanwhit@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Whitaker <nathan@deno.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 1.41.2
Signed-off-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
