Adds much better support for the unstable Deno workspaces as well as
support for npm workspaces. npm workspaces is still lacking in that we
only install packages into the root node_modules folder. We'll make it
smarter over time in order for it to figure out when to add node_modules
folders within packages.
This includes a breaking change in config file resolution where we stop
searching for config files on the first found package.json unless it's
in a workspace. For the previous behaviour, the root deno.json needs to
be updated to be a workspace by adding `"workspace":
["./path-to-pkg-json-folder-goes-here"]`. See details in
https://github.com/denoland/deno_config/pull/66
Closes #24340
Closes #24159
Closes #24161
Closes #22020
Closes #18546
Closes #16106
Closes #24160
Allows writing named sub-tests. These are:
1. Filterable on the command line via `cargo test ...`
2. Run in parallel
3. Use a fresh temp and deno dir for each test (unlike steps)
Fixes #23053.
Two small bugs here:
- the existing condition for printing out the group header was broken.
it worked in the reproducer (in the issue above) without filtering only
by accident, due to setting `self.has_ungrouped = true` once we see the
warmup bench. Knowing that we sort benchmarks to put ungrouped benches
first, there are only two cases: 1) we are starting the first group 2)
we are ending the previous group and starting a new group
- when you passed `--filter` we were applying that filter to the warmup
bench (which is not visible to users), so we suffered from jit bias if
you were filtering (unless your filter was `<warmup>`)
TLDR;
Running
```bash
deno bench main.js --filter="G"
```
```js
// main.js
Deno.bench({
group: "G1",
name: "G1-A",
fn() {},
});
Deno.bench({
group: "G1",
name: "G1-B",
fn() {},
});
```
Before this PR:
```
benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995
--------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
G1-A 303.52 ps/iter3,294,726,102.1 (254.2 ps … 7.8 ns) 287.5 ps 391.7 ps 437.5 ps
G1-B 3.8 ns/iter 263,360,635.9 (2.24 ns … 8.36 ns) 3.84 ns 4.73 ns 4.94 ns
summary
G1-A
12.51x faster than G1-B
```
After this PR:
```
benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995
--------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
group G1
G1-A 3.85 ns/iter 259,822,096.0 (2.42 ns … 9.03 ns) 3.83 ns 4.62 ns 4.83 ns
G1-B 3.84 ns/iter 260,458,274.5 (3.55 ns … 7.05 ns) 3.83 ns 4.45 ns 4.7 ns
summary
G1-B
1x faster than G1-A
```
