<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
As the title.
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
These methods are confusing because the arguments are backwards. I feel
like they should have never been added to `Option<T>` and that clippy
should suggest rewriting to
`map(...).unwrap_or(...)`/`map(...).unwrap_or_else(|| ...)`
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/1025
Covered ranges were not merged and thus it appeared that some lines
might be uncovered. To fix this I used "v8-coverage" that takes care
of merging the ranges properly. With this change, coverage collected
from a file by multiple entrypoints is now correctly calculated.
I ended up forking https://github.com/demurgos/v8-coverage and adding
"cli/tools/coverage/merge.rs" and "cli/tools/coverage/range_tree.rs".
