This commit splits "<ext_name>::init" functions into "init_ops" and
"init_ops_and_esm". That way we don't have to construct list of
ESM sources on each startup if we're running with a snapshot.
In a follow up commit "deno_core" will be changed to not have a split
between "extensions" and "extensions_with_js" - it will be embedders'
responsibility to pass appropriately configured extensions.
Prerequisite for https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/18080
There's no point for this API to expect result. If something fails it should
result in a panic during build time to signal to embedder that setup is
wrong.
This PR refactors all internal js files (except core) to be written as
ES modules.
`__bootstrap`has been mostly replaced with static imports in form in
`internal:[path to file from repo root]`.
To specify if files are ESM, an `esm` method has been added to
`Extension`, similar to the `js` method.
A new ModuleLoader called `InternalModuleLoader` has been added to
enable the loading of internal specifiers, which is used in all
situations except when a snapshot is only loaded, and not a new one is
created from it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
Previously `op_net_listen`, `op_net_accept`, and various other ops in
ext/net where variadic on the transport. This created a lot of code
bloat. This commit updates the code to instead have separate ops for
each transport.
This allows resources to be "streams" by implementing read/write/shutdown. These streams are implicit since their nature (read/write/duplex) isn't known until called, but we could easily add another method to explicitly tag resources as streams.
`op_read/op_write/op_shutdown` are now builtin ops provided by `deno_core`
Note: this current implementation is simple & straightforward but it results in an additional alloc per read/write call
Closes #12556
These are confusing. They say they are "for users that don't care about
permissions", but that isn't correct. `NoTimersPermissions` disables
permissions instead of enabling them.
I would argue that implementors should decide what permissions they want
themselves, and not take our opinionated permissions struct.
