… (#19463)"
This reverts commit ceb03cfb03.
This is being reverted because it causes 3.5Mb increase in the binary
size,
due to runtime JS code being included in the binary, even though it's
already snapshotted.
CC @nayeemrmn
This prevents documents specified in a deno.json's "exclude" from being
pre-loaded by the lsp.
For example, someone may have something like:
```jsonc
// deno.json
{
"exclude": [
"dist" // build directory
]
}
```
Remove `ExtensionFileSourceCode::LoadedFromFsDuringSnapshot` and feature
`include_js_for_snapshotting` since they leak paths that are only
applicable in this repo to embedders. Replace with feature
`exclude_js_sources`. Additionally the feature
`force_include_js_sources` allows negating it, if both features are set.
We need both of these because features are additive and there must be a
way of force including sources for snapshot creation while still having
the `exclude_js_sources` feature. `force_include_js_sources` is only set
for build deps, so sources are still excluded from the final binary.
You can also specify `force_include_js_sources` on any extension to
override the above features for that extension. Towards #19398.
But there was still the snapshot-from-snapshot situation where code
could be executed twice, I addressed that by making `mod_evaluate()` and
scripts like `core/01_core.js` behave idempotently. This allowed
unifying `ext::init_ops()` and `ext::init_ops_and_esm()` into
`ext::init()`.
I'm unsure why we canonicalize the config file path when loading and the
canonicalization is causing issues in #19431 because everything in the
lsp is not canonicalized except the config file (actually, the config
file is only canonicalized when auto-discovered and not whens pecified).
We also don't canonicalize module paths when loading them.
Canonicalization was added in https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/7621
This commit adds ability to print metrics of the Tokio
runtime to the console by passing "DENO_TOKIO_METRICS=1"
env var.
Metrics will be printed every second, but this can be changed
by "DENO_TOKIO_METRICS_INTERVAL=500" env var.
Reduce the GC pressure from the websocket event method by splitting it
into an event getter and a buffer getter.
Before:
165.9k msg/sec
After:
169.9k msg/sec
This commit migrates "deno_core" from using "FuturesUnordered" to
"tokio::task::JoinSet". This makes every op to be a separate Tokio task
and should unlock better utilization of kqueue/epoll.
There were two quirks added to this PR:
- because of the fact that "JoinSet" immediately polls spawn tasks,
op sanitizers can give false positives in some cases, this was
alleviated by polling event loop once before running a test with
"deno test", which gives canceled ops an opportunity to settle
- "JsRuntimeState::waker" was moved to "OpState::waker" so that FFI
API can still use threadsafe functions - without this change the
registered wakers were wrong as they would not wake up the
whole "JsRuntime" but the task associated with an op
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
This commit adds basic support for "node:http2" module. Not
all APIs have been yet implemented, but this change already
allows to use this module for some basic functions.
The "grpc" package is still not working, but it's a good stepping
stone.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bartek Iwańczuk <biwanczuk@gmail.com>
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
The FileHandle class has many missing methods compared to node.
Add these.
## WHAT
- Add close method
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
Related issue: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19358.
This is a regression that seems to have been introduced in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/pull/18905. It looks to have been a
performance optimization.
The issue is probably easiest described with some code:
```ts
const target = new EventTarget();
const event = new Event("foo");
target.addEventListener("foo", () => {
console.log('base');
target.addEventListener("foo", () => {
console.log('nested');
});
});
target.dispatchEvent(event);
```
Essentially, the second event listener is being attached while the `foo`
event is still being dispatched. It should then not fire that second
event listener, but Deno currently does.
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
Internally, `node-tap` spawns a child process with `stdio: [0, 1, 2]`.
Whilst we don't support passing fd numbers as an argument so far, it
turns out that `[0, 1, 2]` is equivalent to `"inherit"` which we already
support. See: https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#optionsstdio
Mapping it to `"inherit"` is fine for us and gets us one step closer in
getting `node-tap` working. I'm now at the stage where already the
coverage table is shown 🎉
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
## WHY
ref: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/19165
Node's fs/promises includes a FileHandle class, but deno does not. The
open function in Node's fs/promises returns a FileHandle, which provides
an IO interface to the file. However, deno's open function returns a
resource id.
### deno
```js
> const fs = await import("node:fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./README.md");
undefined
> file3
3
> file3.read
undefined
Node:
```
### Node
```js
> const fs = await import("fs/promises");
undefined
> const file3 = await fs.open("./tests/e2e_unit/testdata/file.txt");
undefined
> file3
FileHandle {
_events: [Object: null prototype] {},
_eventsCount: 0,
_maxListeners: undefined,
close: [Function: close],
[Symbol(kCapture)]: false,
[Symbol(kHandle)]: FileHandle {},
[Symbol(kFd)]: 24,
[Symbol(kRefs)]: 1,
[Symbol(kClosePromise)]: null
}
> file3.read
[Function: read]
```
To be compatible with Node, deno's open function should also return a
FileHandle.
## WHAT
I have implemented the first step in adding a FileHandle.
- Changed the return value of the open function to a FileHandle object
- Implemented the readFile method in FileHandle
- Add test code
## What to do next
This PR is the first step in adding a FileHandle, and there are things
that should be done next.
- Add functionality equivalent to Node's FileHandle to FileHandle
(currently there is only readFile)
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
