The same issue in two different places - doing blocking FS work in an
async task, limiting the amount of work that happens concurrently.
- When setting up node_modules, where we try to set up entries
concurrently but were blocking other tasks from actually running.
- When loading package info from the npm registry file cache, loading
and deserializing is expensive and prevents concurrency. This was
especially noticeable when loading an npm resolution snapshot from a
lockfile (`snapshot_from_lockfile` in `deno_npm`).
Installing deps in `deno-docs`:
```
❯ hyperfine -i -p 'rm -rf node_modules/' '../d7/deno-main i' '../d7/target/release/deno i'
Benchmark 1: ../d7/deno-main i
Time (mean ± σ): 2.193 s ± 0.027 s [User: 0.589 s, System: 1.033 s]
Range (min … max): 2.151 s … 2.242 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: ../d7/target/release/deno i
Time (mean ± σ): 1.597 s ± 0.021 s [User: 0.977 s, System: 1.337 s]
Range (min … max): 1.550 s … 1.627 s 10 runs
Summary
../d7/target/release/deno i ran
1.37 ± 0.02 times faster than ../d7/deno-main i
```
Caching `npm:@11ty/eleventy`:
```
❯ hyperfine -i -p 'rm -rf node_modules/' --warmup 5 '../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy' '../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy'
Benchmark 1: ../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 129.9 ms ± 2.2 ms [User: 27.5 ms, System: 101.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 127.5 ms … 135.8 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: ../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 100.6 ms ± 1.3 ms [User: 38.8 ms, System: 233.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 99.3 ms … 103.2 ms 10 runs
Summary
../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy ran
1.29 ± 0.03 times faster than ../../d7/deno-main cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
```
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@gmail.com>
Hard linking (`linkat`) is ridiculously slow on mac. `copyfile` is
better, but what's even faster is `clonefile`. It doesn't have the space
savings that comes with hardlinking, but the performance difference is
worth it imo.
```
❯ hyperfine -i -p 'rm -rf node_modules/' '../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy' 'deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy'
Benchmark 1: ../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 115.4 ms ± 1.2 ms [User: 27.2 ms, System: 87.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 113.7 ms … 117.5 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
Time (mean ± σ): 619.3 ms ± 6.4 ms [User: 34.3 ms, System: 575.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 612.2 ms … 633.3 ms 10 runs
Summary
../../d7/target/release/deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy ran
5.37 ± 0.08 times faster than deno cache npm:@11ty/eleventy
```
This commit adds initial support for ".npmrc" files.
Currently we only discover ".npmrc" files next to "package.json" files
and discovering these files in user home dir is left for a follow up.
This pass supports "_authToken" and "_auth" configuration
for providing authentication.
LSP support has been left for a follow up PR.
Towards https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/16105
This functionality was broken. The series of events was:
1. Load the npm resolution from the lockfile.
2. Discover only a subset of the specifiers in the documents.
3. Clear the npm snapshot.
4. Redo npm resolution with the new specifiers (~500ms).
What this now does:
1. Load the npm resolution from the lockfile.
2. Discover only a subset of the specifiers in the documents and take
into account the specifiers from the lockfile.
3. Do not redo resolution (~1ms).
This PR adds a new unstable "bring your own node_modules" (BYONM)
functionality currently behind a `--unstable-byonm` flag (`"unstable":
["byonm"]` in a deno.json).
This enables users to run a separate install command (ex. `npm install`,
`pnpm install`) then run `deno run main.ts` and Deno will respect the
layout of the node_modules directory as setup by the separate install
command. It also works with npm/yarn/pnpm workspaces.
For this PR, the behaviour is opted into by specifying
`--unstable-byonm`/`"unstable": ["byonm"]`, but in the future we may
make this the default behaviour as outlined in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/18967#issuecomment-1761248941
This is an extremely rough initial implementation. Errors are
terrible in this and the LSP requires frequent restarts. Improvements
will be done in follow up PRs.
