Improving the breadth of collected data, and ensuring that the collected
data is more likely to be successfully reported.
- Use `log` crate in more places
- Hook up `log` crate to otel
- Switch to process-wide otel processors
- Handle places that use `process::exit`
Also adds a more robust testing framework, with a deterministic tracing
setting.
Refs: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/26852
1. Generally we should prefer to use the `log` crate.
2. I very often accidentally commit `eprintln`s.
When we should use `println` or `eprintln`, it's not too bad to be a bit
more verbose and ignore the lint rule.
<!--
Before submitting a PR, please read https://deno.com/manual/contributing
1. Give the PR a descriptive title.
Examples of good title:
- fix(std/http): Fix race condition in server
- docs(console): Update docstrings
- feat(doc): Handle nested reexports
Examples of bad title:
- fix #7123
- update docs
- fix bugs
2. Ensure there is a related issue and it is referenced in the PR text.
3. Ensure there are tests that cover the changes.
4. Ensure `cargo test` passes.
5. Ensure `./tools/format.js` passes without changing files.
6. Ensure `./tools/lint.js` passes.
7. Open as a draft PR if your work is still in progress. The CI won't
run
all steps, but you can add '[ci]' to a commit message to force it to.
8. If you would like to run the benchmarks on the CI, add the 'ci-bench'
label.
-->
As the title.
---------
Co-authored-by: Matt Mastracci <matthew@mastracci.com>
