The intent is that those tests will be executed, but our check that the
files are up to date won't overwrite the contents of the tests. This is
useful when a test needs some manual edits to work.
It turns out we weren't actually running them.
---
This ended up turning into a couple of small bug fixes to get the tests
passing:
- We weren't canonicalizing the exec path properly (it sometimes still
had `..` or `.` in it)
- We weren't accepting strings in `process.exit`
There was one failure I couldn't figure out quickly, so I disabled the
test for now, and filed a follow up issue: #24694
29934d558c