Nathan Whitaker a4c76add56 fix(cli): Respect implied BYONM from DENO_FUTURE in deno task (#24652) ... Regression from 04f9db5b22 Originally I thought to fix the issue in the PR we needed to explicitly pass through the `node-modules-dir` flag, but after applying the correct fix that david pointed out (setting `NPM_PROCESS_STATE`) that wasn't necessary (or correct). We had a test for deno task with BYONM, but it only tested with `"unstable": ["byonm"]` in deno.json, so it didn't catch this.		2024-07-19 18:59:04 +00:00
..
local	feat(node): Support executing npm package lifecycle scripts (preinstall/install/postinstall) (#24487)	2024-07-10 03:06:08 +00:00
common.rs	refactor: use concrete error types for node resolution (#24470)	2024-07-09 12:15:03 -04:00
global.rs	refactor: use concrete error types for node resolution (#24470)	2024-07-09 12:15:03 -04:00
local.rs	fix(cli): Respect implied BYONM from DENO_FUTURE in deno task (#24652)	2024-07-19 18:59:04 +00:00
mod.rs	feat(node): Support executing npm package lifecycle scripts (preinstall/install/postinstall) (#24487)	2024-07-10 03:06:08 +00:00