Nathan Whitaker 9b6959129a fix(cli): Respect implied BYONM from DENO_FUTURE in deno task (#24652) ... Regression from 04f9db5b22 Originally I thought to fix the issue in the PR we needed to explicitly pass through the `node-modules-dir` flag, but after applying the correct fix that david pointed out (setting `NPM_PROCESS_STATE`) that wasn't necessary (or correct). We had a test for deno task with BYONM, but it only tested with `"unstable": ["byonm"]` in deno.json, so it didn't catch this.		2024-07-22 22:47:58 +02:00
..
bin_package	fix(cli): Overwrite existing bin entries in node_modules (#24123)	2024-06-06 21:21:25 +00:00
byonm	fix(cli): Respect implied BYONM from DENO_FUTURE in deno task (#24652)	2024-07-22 22:47:58 +02:00
doc_comments_incorrect	feat(task): Task description in the form of comments (#23101)	2024-03-27 14:14:27 -07:00
doc_comments_no_args	feat(task): Task description in the form of comments (#23101)	2024-03-27 14:14:27 -07:00
invalid_unstable_feature	fix: add warning for invalid unstable feature use in deno.json/jsonc (#24120)	2024-07-09 01:50:47 +00:00
node_modules_dir_false	fix(task): do not error if node_modules folder not exists (#23920)	2024-05-21 16:12:14 -04:00
npm_run	fix(task): always use npm for npm run with flags (#24028)	2024-05-29 20:16:35 +00:00
npx_installed_pkg_non_byonm	fix(task): regression where npx <command> sometimes couldn't find command (#23730)	2024-05-09 03:16:44 +00:00
workspace	feat: npm workspace and better Deno workspace support (#24334)	2024-07-04 00:54:33 +00:00