mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs.git
synced 2024-11-25 18:19:26 -05:00
89 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
89 lines
4 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
title: Pull requests and Git flow
|
||
|
license: 'CC-BY-SA-4.0'
|
||
|
origin_url: 'https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Documentation/src/commit/7bb8fa5ca559073c028805888195ee31b1f3d9c2/content/collaborating/pull-requests-and-git-flow.md'
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Benefits of a pull-request based workflow
|
||
|
|
||
|
> **_TLDR:_** _Keep an eye on your repository and organization permissions. Don't take sweets from strangers. Use pull requests. Easy to review, easy to manage, and only the project maintainers/owners have permission to merge them._
|
||
|
|
||
|
Although it is perfectly possible to use a Git project on Codeberg just as single shared central repository for individuals and teams, a collaborative workflow based on pull requests provides many benefits:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- The "hot" project repository requires only very few maintainers with full rights to sign off pull requests. Contributors can easily work on forked repositories.
|
||
|
- Each pull request collects the full edit history for a fix or feature branch. Contributors can squash this, or keep it, just as they prefer.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Create a pull-request
|
||
|
|
||
|
Let's say, you would like to contribute to our "examples" project [knut/examples](https://codeberg.org/knut/examples).
|
||
|
|
||
|
First, fork the project you would like to work on, by clicking the `Fork` button in the top-right corner of the project page:
|
||
|
|
||
|
![Fork a project](../_images/user/pull-request/fork-button.png)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Then, clone it onto your local machine. We assume that [you have set up your SSH keys](/security/ssh-key). This has to be done only once:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```shell
|
||
|
git clone git@codeberg.org:<YOURCODEBERGUSERNAME>/examples.git
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
Now, let's create a feature branch, do some changes, commit, push, edit, commit, push, ..., edit, commit, push:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```shell
|
||
|
git checkout -b feature
|
||
|
# do some changes
|
||
|
git commit -m "first feature"
|
||
|
git push # here you get asked to set your upstream URL, just confirm
|
||
|
# do more work, edit...
|
||
|
git add new_file.png
|
||
|
git commit -m "second feature introducing a new file"
|
||
|
git push
|
||
|
# ...
|
||
|
git commit -m "more work, tidy-up"
|
||
|
git push
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
Now you can create a pull request by visiting the main repository page and clicking on the `New Pull Request` button.
|
||
|
|
||
|
![Create a pull request](../_images/user/pull-request/pull-request-button.png)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This button is automatically shown if:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- You are the pusher on a branch that still exists and that is not the default branch
|
||
|
- The push must occurred within the last 6 hours
|
||
|
- There is no open PR for this branch
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Keep it up-to-date: rebase pull requests to upstream
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sometimes the upstream project repository is evolving while we are working on a feature branch, and we need to rebase and resolve merge conflicts for upstream changes into our feature branch. This is not hard:
|
||
|
|
||
|
In order to track the `upstream` repository, we'll add a second remote that is pointing to the original project. This has to be done only once:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```shell
|
||
|
git remote add upstream git@codeberg.org:knut/examples.git
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can also use the SSH variant here for public projects, if you want to be
|
||
|
able to pull without specifying your credentials.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Now, let's pull from `upstream`, and rebase our local branch against the latest `HEAD` of the upstream project repository (e.g. the `main` branch):
|
||
|
|
||
|
```shell
|
||
|
git pull --rebase upstream main
|
||
|
git pull
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
That's it. You can now push your changes, and create the pull request as usual by clicking on the "New Pull Request" button.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## A friendly note on owner rights, and force push permissions
|
||
|
|
||
|
Please keep in mind that project owners can do _everything_, including editing and rewriting the history using `force-push`. In some cases, this is a useful feature
|
||
|
(for example to undo accidental commits or clean up PRs),
|
||
|
but in most cases a transparent history based on a pull-request based workflow is surely preferable,
|
||
|
especially for the default branches of your project where other people rely on intact history.
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Warning** If you accidentally leaked sensitive data, say, leaked credentials,
|
||
|
keep in mind that commits stay directly accessible, e.g. from the user
|
||
|
activity tab or a Pull Request feed, for a while.
|
||
|
Please contact us if you really need to remove such data from the public.
|