Forgejo is a set of commits applied to the Gitea development branch and the stable branches. On a regular basis those commits are cherry-picked and modified if necessary to keep working. All Forgejo commits are merged into a branch from which binary releases and packages are created and distributed. The development workflow is a set of conventions Forgejo developers are expected to follow to work together.
Before cherry-picking on top of Gitea, all branches are copied to `soft-fork/YYYY-MM-DD/<branch>` for safekeeping. Older `soft-fork/*/<branch>` branches are converted into references under the same name. Similar to how pull requests store their head, they do not clutter the list of branches but can be retrieved if needed with `git fetch +refs/soft-fork/*:refs/soft-fork/*`. Tooling to automate this archival process [is available](https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/soft-fork-tools/src/branch/master/README.md#archive-branches).
- [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development) based on [forgejo-ci](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-ci)
Forgejo development tools, tests etc. that do not fit in a feature branch or that are used by multiple feature branches. The commits titles should be prefixed with
a string that reflects their purpose such as `[DOCS]`, `[DB]`, `[TESTS]` etc.
The database migrations of all feature branches must be in the `forgejo-development` branch. This is a requirement to ensure they do not conflict with each other
- [forgejo-dependency](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-dependency) based on [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development)
Each commit is prefixed with the name of dependency in uppercase, for instance **[GOTH]** or **[GITEA]**. They are standalone and implement either a bug fix or a feature that is in the process of being contributed to the dependency. It is better to contribute directly to the dependency instead of adding a commit to this branch but it is sometimes not possible, for instance when someone does not have a GitHub account. The author of the commit is responsible for rebasing and resolve conflicts. The ultimate goal of this branch is to be empty and it is expected that a continuous effort is made to reduce its content so that the technical debt it represents does not burden Forgejo long term.
- [forgejo-privacy](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-privacy) based on [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development)
- [forgejo-moderation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-moderation) based on [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development)
- [forgejo-branding](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-branding) based on [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development)
- [forgejo-i18n](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-i18n) based on [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development)
- [forgejo-a11y](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-a11y) based on [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development)
- [forgejo-federation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-federation) based on [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development)
- [forgejo-f3](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-f3) based on [forgejo-development](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo-development)
Most people who are used to contributing will be familiar with the workflow of sending a pull request against the default branch. When that happens the reviewer may ask to change the base branch to the appropriate _Feature branch_ instead. If the pull request does not fit in any _Feature branch_, the reviewer needs to make decision to either:
_Feature branches_ can contain a number of commits grouped together, for instance for branding the documentation, the landing page and the footer. It makes it convenient for people working on that topic to get the big picture without browsing multiple branches. Creating a new _Feature branch_ for each individual commit, while possible, is likely to be difficult to work with.
Observing the granularity of the existing _Feature branches_ is the best way to figure out what works and what does not. It requires adjustments from time to time depending on the number of contributors and the complexity of the Forgejo codebase.
