It was quite painful yesterday to try to figure out why my workflow didn't work anymore after the Forgejo migration. Turns out that `gitea/act_runner` used a different default Docker image. With this PR, it should be clearer to other people what is the meaning of the labels.
Co-authored-by: Rik Huijzer <github@huijzer.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/475
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Rik Huijzer <rikh@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Rik Huijzer <rikh@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR extends the examples that were provided by @earl-warren in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/runner. I've tested this configuration twice today on two completely separate servers. For more information about the whole process that I've used, see https://huijzer.xyz/posts/forgejo-setup/.
I'll try to extract upstream a bit more information to the Forgejo docs. Feel free to take anything from my blog that seems useful and don't worry about credits. Feel free to copy whatever seems useful.
Co-authored-by: Rik Huijzer <github@huijzer.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/474
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Rik Huijzer <rikh@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Rik Huijzer <rikh@noreply.codeberg.org>
It doesn't feel right to have such guide on the installation page, it
feels more natural to have it's own page. This also keeps the
'installation' page clean, which currently feels more like an index
page, given it's linking to two other pages (installation from {binary,docker}).
Preview: https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@docs_pull_427/docs/next/admin/customization/
---
The previous version of this document insinuated that you need to be
familiar with Forgejo's source code and compile Forgejo from source
for custom branding changes. As of the most recent Forgejo version,
this is not necessarily true, as custom files can be served from
the CustomPath.
Administrators that were not developers therefore dismissed the
other guide and its contents without reading this, and I was one
of them. I thought it would make sense for this file to provide
information on where to put a custom logo. This change does not
fix it (this will be done later), but it will reduce the confusion
for now.
This warning confused me personally and other Forgejo users, as I
had one person tell me IRL that they thought that it was not possible
to serve a custom logo.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/427
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
Co-committed-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net>
In `admin/database-preparation` suggest `utf8mb4_bin` as the collate
function, rather than `utf8mb4_unicode_ci`. The former is accent- and
case sensitive, while the latter isn't, and Forgejo assumes that columns
are case sensitive.
Also add a short paragraph explaining why `utf8mb4_bin` is
suggested (case sensitivity), and what problems may arise and why if
case insensitive collation is used.
This partially addresses forgejo/forgejo#2039.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <me@gergo.csillger.hu>
Add a description of the steps necessary to migrate a Gitea installation to Forgejo on Arch Linux using the native packages.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/298
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Paul Sargent <psarge@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Paul Sargent <psarge@gmail.com>
The upcoming 3.1 release of the Forgeo runner will allow to specify
which template and release must be must be used for a LXC
container. It also defines the lxc:// scheme as distinct from the
host:// scheme.
The host:// scheme is documented to be used for running jobs directly
from the host, which was not possible with the Forgejo runner versions
prior to 3.1
- [Shiki](https://github.com/shikijs/shiki) doesn't support highlighting
Go templates, so instead use handlebars template highlighting for this
code snippet.
