This mainly came about because I noticed an inconsistency in the
`docs/user/actions.md` section, where it said a snippet ensures the usage
of _Alpine 3.18_, but the snippet actually obviously said _3.19_.
While I was at it, I just updated all mentions of Alpine I could find to
the current _3.20_.
This PR
- adds more details regarding the nature of the secret used when registering runners offline using `forgejo-cli actions register`,
- explains how to change the secret for an existing runner ([Forgejo PR #4619](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4619)),
- explains how to keep the Forgejo-side command idempotent if the labels aren't known ([Forgejo PR #4610](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4610))
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/769
Reviewed-by: twenty-panda <twenty-panda@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Emmanuel BENOÎT <tseeker@nocternity.net>
Co-committed-by: Emmanuel BENOÎT <tseeker@nocternity.net>
Now that I've finished `/docs/user` I suppose I will start working on `/docs/admin`. I didn't change all the files at once since I thought it would be annoying for the maintainers to review. If you prefer I make all the changes at once, feel free to let me know and I would be happy to do that as well. :)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/656
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
Co-authored-by: Abdur-Rahman Mansoor <armansoor@missingno.dev>
Co-committed-by: Abdur-Rahman Mansoor <armansoor@missingno.dev>
Per "request" of @0ko in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270#issuecomment-1774032
TODOs
- postponed: how to add codespell (written in Python) to CI -- separate workflow? add to some other step? to some other tool/specification?
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/536
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Hi,
somehow I made a hash of the last PR #522 so it failed linting again. I hope it is ok now. Sorry for the noise!
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/525
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Christian Drexler <xunzi@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Christian Drexler <xunzi@noreply.codeberg.org>
It was quite painful yesterday to try to figure out why my workflow didn't work anymore after the Forgejo migration. Turns out that `gitea/act_runner` used a different default Docker image. With this PR, it should be clearer to other people what is the meaning of the labels.
Co-authored-by: Rik Huijzer <github@huijzer.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/475
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Rik Huijzer <rikh@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Rik Huijzer <rikh@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR extends the examples that were provided by @earl-warren in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/runner. I've tested this configuration twice today on two completely separate servers. For more information about the whole process that I've used, see https://huijzer.xyz/posts/forgejo-setup/.
I'll try to extract upstream a bit more information to the Forgejo docs. Feel free to take anything from my blog that seems useful and don't worry about credits. Feel free to copy whatever seems useful.
Co-authored-by: Rik Huijzer <github@huijzer.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/474
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Rik Huijzer <rikh@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Rik Huijzer <rikh@noreply.codeberg.org>
The upcoming 3.1 release of the Forgeo runner will allow to specify
which template and release must be must be used for a LXC
container. It also defines the lxc:// scheme as distinct from the
host:// scheme.
The host:// scheme is documented to be used for running jobs directly
from the host, which was not possible with the Forgejo runner versions
prior to 3.1
See 9b698362a3
Also remove the token line from the .runner file. It is confusing and
difficult to explain because it is different from the registration
token. It really is a shared secret between the runner and the Forgejo
instance that has a purpose which is entirely different.
