1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-12-28 13:49:13 -05:00
forgejo/tests/integration/api_branch_test.go

282 lines
10 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package integration
import (
"net/http"
"net/http/httptest"
"net/url"
"testing"
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
git_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/git"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
2024-05-16 04:48:48 -04:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func testAPIGetBranch(t *testing.T, branchName string, exists bool) {
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
token := getUserToken(t, "user2", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/branches/%s", branchName).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, NoExpectedStatus)
if !exists {
assert.EqualValues(t, http.StatusNotFound, resp.Code)
return
}
assert.EqualValues(t, http.StatusOK, resp.Code)
var branch api.Branch
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &branch)
assert.EqualValues(t, branchName, branch.Name)
assert.True(t, branch.UserCanPush)
assert.True(t, branch.UserCanMerge)
}
func testAPIGetBranchProtection(t *testing.T, branchName string, expectedHTTPStatus int) *api.BranchProtection {
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
token := getUserToken(t, "user2", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/branch_protections/%s", branchName).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, expectedHTTPStatus)
if resp.Code == http.StatusOK {
var branchProtection api.BranchProtection
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &branchProtection)
assert.EqualValues(t, branchName, branchProtection.RuleName)
return &branchProtection
}
return nil
}
func testAPICreateBranchProtection(t *testing.T, branchName string, expectedHTTPStatus int) {
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
token := getUserToken(t, "user2", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/branch_protections", &api.BranchProtection{
RuleName: branchName,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, expectedHTTPStatus)
if resp.Code == http.StatusCreated {
var branchProtection api.BranchProtection
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &branchProtection)
assert.EqualValues(t, branchName, branchProtection.RuleName)
}
}
func testAPIEditBranchProtection(t *testing.T, branchName string, body *api.BranchProtection, expectedHTTPStatus int) {
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
token := getUserToken(t, "user2", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PATCH", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/branch_protections/"+branchName, body).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, expectedHTTPStatus)
if resp.Code == http.StatusOK {
var branchProtection api.BranchProtection
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &branchProtection)
assert.EqualValues(t, branchName, branchProtection.RuleName)
}
}
func testAPIDeleteBranchProtection(t *testing.T, branchName string, expectedHTTPStatus int) {
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
token := getUserToken(t, "user2", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestf(t, "DELETE", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/branch_protections/%s", branchName).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, expectedHTTPStatus)
}
func testAPIDeleteBranch(t *testing.T, branchName string, expectedHTTPStatus int) {
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
token := getUserToken(t, "user2", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestf(t, "DELETE", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/branches/%s", branchName).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, expectedHTTPStatus)
}
func TestAPIGetBranch(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
for _, test := range []struct {
BranchName string
Exists bool
}{
{"master", true},
{"master/doesnotexist", false},
{"feature/1", true},
{"feature/1/doesnotexist", false},
} {
testAPIGetBranch(t, test.BranchName, test.Exists)
}
}
func TestAPICreateBranch(t *testing.T) {
onGiteaRun(t, testAPICreateBranches)
}
func testAPICreateBranches(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
2024-05-16 04:54:32 -04:00
forEachObjectFormat(t, func(t *testing.T, objectFormat git.ObjectFormat) {
ctx := NewAPITestContext(t, "user2", "my-noo-repo-"+objectFormat.Name(), auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
giteaURL.Path = ctx.GitPath()
t.Run("CreateRepo", doAPICreateRepository(ctx, false, objectFormat))
testCases := []struct {
OldBranch string
NewBranch string
ExpectedHTTPStatus int
}{
// Creating branch from default branch
{
OldBranch: "",
NewBranch: "new_branch_from_default_branch",
ExpectedHTTPStatus: http.StatusCreated,
},
// Creating branch from master
{
OldBranch: "master",
NewBranch: "new_branch_from_master_1",
ExpectedHTTPStatus: http.StatusCreated,
},
// Trying to create from master but already exists
{
OldBranch: "master",
NewBranch: "new_branch_from_master_1",
ExpectedHTTPStatus: http.StatusConflict,
},
// Trying to create from other branch (not default branch)
// ps: it can't test the case-sensitive behavior here: the "BRANCH_2" can't be created by git on a case-insensitive filesystem, it makes the test fail quickly before the database code.
// Suppose some users are running Gitea on a case-insensitive filesystem, it seems that it's unable to support case-sensitive branch names.
{
OldBranch: "new_branch_from_master_1",
NewBranch: "branch_2",
ExpectedHTTPStatus: http.StatusCreated,
},
// Trying to create from a branch which does not exist
{
OldBranch: "does_not_exist",
NewBranch: "new_branch_from_non_existent",
ExpectedHTTPStatus: http.StatusNotFound,
},
// Trying to create a branch with UTF8
{
OldBranch: "master",
NewBranch: "test-👀",
ExpectedHTTPStatus: http.StatusCreated,
},
}
for _, test := range testCases {
session := ctx.Session
t.Run(test.NewBranch, func(t *testing.T) {
testAPICreateBranch(t, session, ctx.Username, ctx.Reponame, test.OldBranch, test.NewBranch, test.ExpectedHTTPStatus)
})
}
})
}
func testAPICreateBranch(t testing.TB, session *TestSession, user, repo, oldBranch, newBranch string, status int) bool {
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-06-04 14:57:16 -04:00
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/repos/"+user+"/"+repo+"/branches", &api.CreateBranchRepoOption{
BranchName: newBranch,
OldBranchName: oldBranch,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, status)
var branch api.Branch
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &branch)
if resp.Result().StatusCode == http.StatusCreated {
assert.EqualValues(t, newBranch, branch.Name)
}
return resp.Result().StatusCode == status
}
func TestAPIUpdateBranch(t *testing.T) {
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, _ *url.URL) {
t.Run("UpdateBranchWithEmptyRepo", func(t *testing.T) {
testAPIUpdateBranch(t, "user10", "repo6", "master", "test", http.StatusNotFound)
})
t.Run("UpdateBranchWithSameBranchNames", func(t *testing.T) {
resp := testAPIUpdateBranch(t, "user2", "repo1", "master", "master", http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
assert.Contains(t, resp.Body.String(), "Cannot rename a branch using the same name or rename to a branch that already exists.")
})
t.Run("UpdateBranchThatAlreadyExists", func(t *testing.T) {
resp := testAPIUpdateBranch(t, "user2", "repo1", "master", "branch2", http.StatusUnprocessableEntity)
assert.Contains(t, resp.Body.String(), "Cannot rename a branch using the same name or rename to a branch that already exists.")
})
t.Run("UpdateBranchWithNonExistentBranch", func(t *testing.T) {
resp := testAPIUpdateBranch(t, "user2", "repo1", "i-dont-exist", "new-branch-name", http.StatusNotFound)
assert.Contains(t, resp.Body.String(), "Branch doesn't exist.")
})
t.Run("RenameBranchNormalScenario", func(t *testing.T) {
testAPIUpdateBranch(t, "user2", "repo1", "branch2", "new-branch-name", http.StatusNoContent)
})
})
}
func testAPIUpdateBranch(t *testing.T, ownerName, repoName, from, to string, expectedHTTPStatus int) *httptest.ResponseRecorder {
token := getUserToken(t, ownerName, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "PATCH", "api/v1/repos/"+ownerName+"/"+repoName+"/branches/"+from, &api.UpdateBranchRepoOption{
Name: to,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
return MakeRequest(t, req, expectedHTTPStatus)
}
func TestAPIBranchProtection(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
// Branch protection on branch that not exist
testAPICreateBranchProtection(t, "master/doesnotexist", http.StatusCreated)
// Get branch protection on branch that exist but not branch protection
testAPIGetBranchProtection(t, "master", http.StatusNotFound)
testAPICreateBranchProtection(t, "master", http.StatusCreated)
// Can only create once
testAPICreateBranchProtection(t, "master", http.StatusForbidden)
// Can't delete a protected branch
testAPIDeleteBranch(t, "master", http.StatusForbidden)
testAPIGetBranchProtection(t, "master", http.StatusOK)
testAPIEditBranchProtection(t, "master", &api.BranchProtection{
EnablePush: true,
}, http.StatusOK)
// enable status checks, require the "test1" check to pass
testAPIEditBranchProtection(t, "master", &api.BranchProtection{
EnableStatusCheck: true,
StatusCheckContexts: []string{"test1"},
}, http.StatusOK)
bp := testAPIGetBranchProtection(t, "master", http.StatusOK)
assert.True(t, bp.EnableStatusCheck)
assert.Equal(t, []string{"test1"}, bp.StatusCheckContexts)
// disable status checks, clear the list of required checks
testAPIEditBranchProtection(t, "master", &api.BranchProtection{
EnableStatusCheck: false,
StatusCheckContexts: []string{},
}, http.StatusOK)
bp = testAPIGetBranchProtection(t, "master", http.StatusOK)
assert.False(t, bp.EnableStatusCheck)
assert.Equal(t, []string{}, bp.StatusCheckContexts)
testAPIDeleteBranchProtection(t, "master", http.StatusNoContent)
// Test branch deletion
testAPIDeleteBranch(t, "master", http.StatusForbidden)
testAPIDeleteBranch(t, "branch2", http.StatusNoContent)
}
func TestAPICreateBranchWithSyncBranches(t *testing.T) {
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
unittest.AssertCount(t, &git_model.Branch{RepoID: 1}, 4)
// make a broke repository with no branch on database
unittest.AssertSuccessfulDelete(t, &git_model.Branch{RepoID: 1})
ctx := NewAPITestContext(t, "user2", "repo1", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
giteaURL.Path = ctx.GitPath()
testAPICreateBranch(t, ctx.Session, "user2", "repo1", "", "new_branch", http.StatusCreated)
unittest.AssertExistsIf(t, true, &git_model.Branch{RepoID: 1, Name: "new_branch"})
})
}