1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-11-22 08:42:32 -05:00
forgejo/models/issues/label_test.go

423 lines
17 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package issues_test
import (
"testing"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
func TestLabel_CalOpenIssues(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 1})
label.CalOpenIssues()
assert.EqualValues(t, 2, label.NumOpenIssues)
}
Optimization of labels handling in issue_search (#4228) This PR optimizes the SQL query and de-duplicate the labels' ids when generating the query string, on the issue page. <hr/> ### Background Some time ago, BingBot and some other crawlers have been putting my instance on its knees with requests containing a lot of label ids, like this one : ``` [07/Aug/2023:11:28:37 +0200] "GET /Dolibarr/sendrecurringinvoicebymail/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&state=closed&labels=1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c2%2c10%2c2%2c1%2c1%2c10%2c10%2c7%2c6%2c10%2c10%2c3%2c2%2c1%2c5%2c10%2c1%2c6%2c2%2c7%2c3%2c7%2c6%2c10%2c1%2c10%2c1%2c1%2c7%2c7%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c10%2c10%2c1%2c2%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c2%2c1%2c12%2c6%2c6%2c10&milestone=0&project=-1&poster=0 HTTP/1.1" 499 0 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm) Chrome/103.0.5060.134 Safari/537.36" ``` Since each of the label ids implies a join, it grows exponentially expensive for the database engine (at least on PostgreSQL but SQLite suffers a little too). Thus, this PR proposes two enhancements: * rewrite the database query to use only one squashed condition, * deduplicate the label ids when generating the URL. ### Performance comparison Here are some timings on Postgresql-backed, Forgejo 7.0.4 instances : ```sh $ time curl -s -o /dev/null "http://localhost:3000/toto/tata/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&labels=19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25&state=open&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0" real 0m10,491s user 0m0,017s sys 0m0,008s ``` ...and with the patch: ```sh $ time curl -s -o /dev/null "http://localhost:3000/toto/tata/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&labels=19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25&state=open&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0" real 0m0,094s user 0m0,012s sys 0m0,013s ``` ### Annex This issue was originally proposed to [Gitea](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26460) but didn't get much attention, and I switched to Forgejo in the meantime :) Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4228 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Chl <chl@xlii.si> Co-committed-by: Chl <chl@xlii.si>
2024-06-28 01:11:57 -04:00
func TestLabel_LoadSelectedLabelsAfterClick(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
Optimization of labels handling in issue_search (#4228) This PR optimizes the SQL query and de-duplicate the labels' ids when generating the query string, on the issue page. <hr/> ### Background Some time ago, BingBot and some other crawlers have been putting my instance on its knees with requests containing a lot of label ids, like this one : ``` [07/Aug/2023:11:28:37 +0200] "GET /Dolibarr/sendrecurringinvoicebymail/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&state=closed&labels=1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c2%2c10%2c2%2c1%2c1%2c10%2c10%2c7%2c6%2c10%2c10%2c3%2c2%2c1%2c5%2c10%2c1%2c6%2c2%2c7%2c3%2c7%2c6%2c10%2c1%2c10%2c1%2c1%2c7%2c7%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c10%2c10%2c1%2c2%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c2%2c1%2c12%2c6%2c6%2c10&milestone=0&project=-1&poster=0 HTTP/1.1" 499 0 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm) Chrome/103.0.5060.134 Safari/537.36" ``` Since each of the label ids implies a join, it grows exponentially expensive for the database engine (at least on PostgreSQL but SQLite suffers a little too). Thus, this PR proposes two enhancements: * rewrite the database query to use only one squashed condition, * deduplicate the label ids when generating the URL. ### Performance comparison Here are some timings on Postgresql-backed, Forgejo 7.0.4 instances : ```sh $ time curl -s -o /dev/null "http://localhost:3000/toto/tata/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&labels=19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25&state=open&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0" real 0m10,491s user 0m0,017s sys 0m0,008s ``` ...and with the patch: ```sh $ time curl -s -o /dev/null "http://localhost:3000/toto/tata/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&labels=19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25&state=open&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0" real 0m0,094s user 0m0,012s sys 0m0,013s ``` ### Annex This issue was originally proposed to [Gitea](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26460) but didn't get much attention, and I switched to Forgejo in the meantime :) Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4228 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Chl <chl@xlii.si> Co-committed-by: Chl <chl@xlii.si>
2024-06-28 01:11:57 -04:00
// Loading the label id:8 (scope/label2) which have a scope and an
// exclusivity with id:7 (scope/label1)
label := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 8})
// First test : with negative and scope
label.LoadSelectedLabelsAfterClick([]int64{1, -8}, []string{"", "scope"})
assert.Equal(t, "1", label.QueryString)
assert.True(t, label.IsSelected)
Optimization of labels handling in issue_search (#4228) This PR optimizes the SQL query and de-duplicate the labels' ids when generating the query string, on the issue page. <hr/> ### Background Some time ago, BingBot and some other crawlers have been putting my instance on its knees with requests containing a lot of label ids, like this one : ``` [07/Aug/2023:11:28:37 +0200] "GET /Dolibarr/sendrecurringinvoicebymail/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&state=closed&labels=1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c2%2c10%2c2%2c1%2c1%2c10%2c10%2c7%2c6%2c10%2c10%2c3%2c2%2c1%2c5%2c10%2c1%2c6%2c2%2c7%2c3%2c7%2c6%2c10%2c1%2c10%2c1%2c1%2c7%2c7%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c10%2c10%2c1%2c2%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c2%2c1%2c12%2c6%2c6%2c10&milestone=0&project=-1&poster=0 HTTP/1.1" 499 0 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm) Chrome/103.0.5060.134 Safari/537.36" ``` Since each of the label ids implies a join, it grows exponentially expensive for the database engine (at least on PostgreSQL but SQLite suffers a little too). Thus, this PR proposes two enhancements: * rewrite the database query to use only one squashed condition, * deduplicate the label ids when generating the URL. ### Performance comparison Here are some timings on Postgresql-backed, Forgejo 7.0.4 instances : ```sh $ time curl -s -o /dev/null "http://localhost:3000/toto/tata/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&labels=19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25&state=open&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0" real 0m10,491s user 0m0,017s sys 0m0,008s ``` ...and with the patch: ```sh $ time curl -s -o /dev/null "http://localhost:3000/toto/tata/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&labels=19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25&state=open&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0" real 0m0,094s user 0m0,012s sys 0m0,013s ``` ### Annex This issue was originally proposed to [Gitea](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26460) but didn't get much attention, and I switched to Forgejo in the meantime :) Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4228 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Chl <chl@xlii.si> Co-committed-by: Chl <chl@xlii.si>
2024-06-28 01:11:57 -04:00
// Second test : with duplicates
label.LoadSelectedLabelsAfterClick([]int64{1, 7, 1, 7, 7}, []string{"", "scope", "", "scope", "scope"})
assert.Equal(t, "1,8", label.QueryString)
assert.False(t, label.IsSelected)
Optimization of labels handling in issue_search (#4228) This PR optimizes the SQL query and de-duplicate the labels' ids when generating the query string, on the issue page. <hr/> ### Background Some time ago, BingBot and some other crawlers have been putting my instance on its knees with requests containing a lot of label ids, like this one : ``` [07/Aug/2023:11:28:37 +0200] "GET /Dolibarr/sendrecurringinvoicebymail/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&state=closed&labels=1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c2%2c10%2c2%2c1%2c1%2c10%2c10%2c7%2c6%2c10%2c10%2c3%2c2%2c1%2c5%2c10%2c1%2c6%2c2%2c7%2c3%2c7%2c6%2c10%2c1%2c10%2c1%2c1%2c7%2c7%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c10%2c10%2c1%2c2%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c1%2c2%2c1%2c12%2c6%2c6%2c10&milestone=0&project=-1&poster=0 HTTP/1.1" 499 0 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; bingbot/2.0; +http://www.bing.com/bingbot.htm) Chrome/103.0.5060.134 Safari/537.36" ``` Since each of the label ids implies a join, it grows exponentially expensive for the database engine (at least on PostgreSQL but SQLite suffers a little too). Thus, this PR proposes two enhancements: * rewrite the database query to use only one squashed condition, * deduplicate the label ids when generating the URL. ### Performance comparison Here are some timings on Postgresql-backed, Forgejo 7.0.4 instances : ```sh $ time curl -s -o /dev/null "http://localhost:3000/toto/tata/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&labels=19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25&state=open&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0" real 0m10,491s user 0m0,017s sys 0m0,008s ``` ...and with the patch: ```sh $ time curl -s -o /dev/null "http://localhost:3000/toto/tata/issues?q=&type=all&sort=&labels=19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25%2c19%2c25&state=open&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0" real 0m0,094s user 0m0,012s sys 0m0,013s ``` ### Annex This issue was originally proposed to [Gitea](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/26460) but didn't get much attention, and I switched to Forgejo in the meantime :) Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4228 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Chl <chl@xlii.si> Co-committed-by: Chl <chl@xlii.si>
2024-06-28 01:11:57 -04:00
// Third test : empty set
label.LoadSelectedLabelsAfterClick([]int64{}, []string{})
assert.False(t, label.IsSelected)
assert.Equal(t, "8", label.QueryString)
}
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 14:17:39 -05:00
func TestLabel_ExclusiveScope(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 14:17:39 -05:00
label := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 7})
assert.Equal(t, "scope", label.ExclusiveScope())
label = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 9})
assert.Equal(t, "scope/subscope", label.ExclusiveScope())
}
func TestNewLabels(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
labels := []*issues_model.Label{
{RepoID: 2, Name: "labelName2", Color: "#123456"},
{RepoID: 3, Name: "labelName3", Color: "#123"},
{RepoID: 4, Name: "labelName4", Color: "ABCDEF"},
{RepoID: 5, Name: "labelName5", Color: "DEF"},
}
require.Error(t, issues_model.NewLabel(db.DefaultContext, &issues_model.Label{RepoID: 3, Name: "invalid Color", Color: ""}))
require.Error(t, issues_model.NewLabel(db.DefaultContext, &issues_model.Label{RepoID: 3, Name: "invalid Color", Color: "#45G"}))
require.Error(t, issues_model.NewLabel(db.DefaultContext, &issues_model.Label{RepoID: 3, Name: "invalid Color", Color: "#12345G"}))
require.Error(t, issues_model.NewLabel(db.DefaultContext, &issues_model.Label{RepoID: 3, Name: "invalid Color", Color: "45G"}))
require.Error(t, issues_model.NewLabel(db.DefaultContext, &issues_model.Label{RepoID: 3, Name: "invalid Color", Color: "12345G"}))
for _, label := range labels {
unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, label)
}
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewLabels(db.DefaultContext, labels...))
for _, label := range labels {
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, label, unittest.Cond("id = ?", label.ID))
}
unittest.CheckConsistencyFor(t, &issues_model.Label{}, &repo_model.Repository{})
}
func TestGetLabelByID(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label, err := issues_model.GetLabelByID(db.DefaultContext, 1)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, label.ID)
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelByID(db.DefaultContext, unittest.NonexistentID)
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrLabelNotExist(err))
}
func TestGetLabelInRepoByName(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label, err := issues_model.GetLabelInRepoByName(db.DefaultContext, 1, "label1")
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, label.ID)
assert.Equal(t, "label1", label.Name)
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInRepoByName(db.DefaultContext, 1, "")
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrRepoLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInRepoByName(db.DefaultContext, unittest.NonexistentID, "nonexistent")
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrRepoLabelNotExist(err))
}
func TestGetLabelInRepoByNames(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
labelIDs, err := issues_model.GetLabelIDsInRepoByNames(db.DefaultContext, 1, []string{"label1", "label2"})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Len(t, labelIDs, 2)
assert.Equal(t, int64(1), labelIDs[0])
assert.Equal(t, int64(2), labelIDs[1])
}
func TestGetLabelInRepoByNamesDiscardsNonExistentLabels(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
// label3 doesn't exists.. See labels.yml
labelIDs, err := issues_model.GetLabelIDsInRepoByNames(db.DefaultContext, 1, []string{"label1", "label2", "label3"})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Len(t, labelIDs, 2)
assert.Equal(t, int64(1), labelIDs[0])
assert.Equal(t, int64(2), labelIDs[1])
require.NoError(t, err)
}
func TestGetLabelInRepoByID(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label, err := issues_model.GetLabelInRepoByID(db.DefaultContext, 1, 1)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, label.ID)
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInRepoByID(db.DefaultContext, 1, -1)
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrRepoLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInRepoByID(db.DefaultContext, unittest.NonexistentID, unittest.NonexistentID)
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrRepoLabelNotExist(err))
}
func TestGetLabelsInRepoByIDs(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
labels, err := issues_model.GetLabelsInRepoByIDs(db.DefaultContext, 1, []int64{1, 2, unittest.NonexistentID})
require.NoError(t, err)
if assert.Len(t, labels, 2) {
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, labels[0].ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, 2, labels[1].ID)
}
}
func TestGetLabelsByRepoID(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
testSuccess := func(repoID int64, sortType string, expectedIssueIDs []int64) {
labels, err := issues_model.GetLabelsByRepoID(db.DefaultContext, repoID, sortType, db.ListOptions{})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Len(t, labels, len(expectedIssueIDs))
for i, label := range labels {
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedIssueIDs[i], label.ID)
}
}
testSuccess(1, "leastissues", []int64{2, 1})
testSuccess(1, "mostissues", []int64{1, 2})
testSuccess(1, "reversealphabetically", []int64{2, 1})
testSuccess(1, "default", []int64{1, 2})
}
// Org versions
func TestGetLabelInOrgByName(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label, err := issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByName(db.DefaultContext, 3, "orglabel3")
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.EqualValues(t, 3, label.ID)
assert.Equal(t, "orglabel3", label.Name)
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByName(db.DefaultContext, 3, "")
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByName(db.DefaultContext, 0, "orglabel3")
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByName(db.DefaultContext, -1, "orglabel3")
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByName(db.DefaultContext, unittest.NonexistentID, "nonexistent")
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
}
func TestGetLabelInOrgByID(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label, err := issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByID(db.DefaultContext, 3, 3)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.EqualValues(t, 3, label.ID)
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByID(db.DefaultContext, 3, -1)
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByID(db.DefaultContext, 0, 3)
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByID(db.DefaultContext, -1, 3)
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelInOrgByID(db.DefaultContext, unittest.NonexistentID, unittest.NonexistentID)
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
}
func TestGetLabelsInOrgByIDs(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
labels, err := issues_model.GetLabelsInOrgByIDs(db.DefaultContext, 3, []int64{3, 4, unittest.NonexistentID})
require.NoError(t, err)
if assert.Len(t, labels, 2) {
assert.EqualValues(t, 3, labels[0].ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, 4, labels[1].ID)
}
}
func TestGetLabelsByOrgID(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
testSuccess := func(orgID int64, sortType string, expectedIssueIDs []int64) {
labels, err := issues_model.GetLabelsByOrgID(db.DefaultContext, orgID, sortType, db.ListOptions{})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Len(t, labels, len(expectedIssueIDs))
for i, label := range labels {
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedIssueIDs[i], label.ID)
}
}
testSuccess(3, "leastissues", []int64{3, 4})
testSuccess(3, "mostissues", []int64{4, 3})
testSuccess(3, "reversealphabetically", []int64{4, 3})
testSuccess(3, "default", []int64{3, 4})
var err error
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelsByOrgID(db.DefaultContext, 0, "leastissues", db.ListOptions{})
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
_, err = issues_model.GetLabelsByOrgID(db.DefaultContext, -1, "leastissues", db.ListOptions{})
assert.True(t, issues_model.IsErrOrgLabelNotExist(err))
}
//
func TestGetLabelsByIssueID(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
labels, err := issues_model.GetLabelsByIssueID(db.DefaultContext, 1)
require.NoError(t, err)
if assert.Len(t, labels, 1) {
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, labels[0].ID)
}
labels, err = issues_model.GetLabelsByIssueID(db.DefaultContext, unittest.NonexistentID)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Empty(t, labels)
}
func TestUpdateLabel(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 1})
// make sure update won't overwrite it
update := &issues_model.Label{
ID: label.ID,
Color: "#ffff00",
Name: "newLabelName",
Description: label.Description,
Exclusive: false,
ArchivedUnix: timeutil.TimeStamp(0),
}
label.Color = update.Color
label.Name = update.Name
require.NoError(t, issues_model.UpdateLabel(db.DefaultContext, update))
newLabel := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 1})
assert.EqualValues(t, label.ID, newLabel.ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, label.Color, newLabel.Color)
assert.EqualValues(t, label.Name, newLabel.Name)
assert.EqualValues(t, label.Description, newLabel.Description)
assert.EqualValues(t, 0, newLabel.ArchivedUnix)
unittest.CheckConsistencyFor(t, &issues_model.Label{}, &repo_model.Repository{})
}
func TestDeleteLabel(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 1})
require.NoError(t, issues_model.DeleteLabel(db.DefaultContext, label.RepoID, label.ID))
unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: label.ID, RepoID: label.RepoID})
require.NoError(t, issues_model.DeleteLabel(db.DefaultContext, label.RepoID, label.ID))
unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: label.ID})
require.NoError(t, issues_model.DeleteLabel(db.DefaultContext, unittest.NonexistentID, unittest.NonexistentID))
unittest.CheckConsistencyFor(t, &issues_model.Label{}, &repo_model.Repository{})
}
func TestHasIssueLabel(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
assert.True(t, issues_model.HasIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, 1, 1))
assert.False(t, issues_model.HasIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, 1, 2))
assert.False(t, issues_model.HasIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, unittest.NonexistentID, unittest.NonexistentID))
}
func TestNewIssueLabel(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 2})
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 1})
doer := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
// add new IssueLabel
prevNumIssues := label.NumIssues
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, issue, label, doer))
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: label.ID})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Comment{
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeLabel,
PosterID: doer.ID,
IssueID: issue.ID,
LabelID: label.ID,
Content: "1",
})
label = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 2})
assert.EqualValues(t, prevNumIssues+1, label.NumIssues)
// re-add existing IssueLabel
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, issue, label, doer))
unittest.CheckConsistencyFor(t, &issues_model.Issue{}, &issues_model.Label{})
}
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 14:17:39 -05:00
func TestNewIssueExclusiveLabel(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 14:17:39 -05:00
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 18})
doer := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
otherLabel := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 6})
exclusiveLabelA := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 7})
exclusiveLabelB := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 8})
// coexisting regular and exclusive label
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, issue, otherLabel, doer))
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, issue, exclusiveLabelA, doer))
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 14:17:39 -05:00
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: otherLabel.ID})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: exclusiveLabelA.ID})
// exclusive label replaces existing one
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, issue, exclusiveLabelB, doer))
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 14:17:39 -05:00
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: otherLabel.ID})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: exclusiveLabelB.ID})
unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: exclusiveLabelA.ID})
// exclusive label replaces existing one again
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewIssueLabel(db.DefaultContext, issue, exclusiveLabelA, doer))
Scoped labels (#22585) Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/` prefix can be set on an issue. The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example `scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in different scopes and can coexist. Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a new label or replacing all labels. In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and batch editing. Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification: * Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus. * In label list, show description below label same as label menus. * Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer. * Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is closer to perceptually linear. * Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling. * Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function. Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu: * Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing. * Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate lines. * Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu. * Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and consistent with settings layout elsewhere. Custom exclusive scoped label rendering: * Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them similar to the `/` symbol. * In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line. --------- Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 14:17:39 -05:00
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: otherLabel.ID})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: exclusiveLabelA.ID})
unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: exclusiveLabelB.ID})
}
func TestNewIssueLabels(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
label1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 1})
label2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 2})
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 5})
doer := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewIssueLabels(db.DefaultContext, issue, []*issues_model.Label{label1, label2}, doer))
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: label1.ID})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Comment{
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeLabel,
PosterID: doer.ID,
IssueID: issue.ID,
LabelID: label1.ID,
Content: "1",
})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID, LabelID: label1.ID})
label1 = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 1})
assert.EqualValues(t, 3, label1.NumIssues)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, label1.NumClosedIssues)
label2 = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: 2})
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, label2.NumIssues)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, label2.NumClosedIssues)
// corner case: test empty slice
require.NoError(t, issues_model.NewIssueLabels(db.DefaultContext, issue, []*issues_model.Label{}, doer))
unittest.CheckConsistencyFor(t, &issues_model.Issue{}, &issues_model.Label{})
}
func TestDeleteIssueLabel(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
testSuccess := func(labelID, issueID, doerID int64) {
label := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: labelID})
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: issueID})
doer := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: doerID})
expectedNumIssues := label.NumIssues
expectedNumClosedIssues := label.NumClosedIssues
if unittest.BeanExists(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issueID, LabelID: labelID}) {
expectedNumIssues--
if issue.IsClosed {
expectedNumClosedIssues--
}
}
ctx, committer, err := db.TxContext(db.DefaultContext)
defer committer.Close()
require.NoError(t, err)
require.NoError(t, issues_model.DeleteIssueLabel(ctx, issue, label, doer))
require.NoError(t, committer.Commit())
unittest.AssertNotExistsBean(t, &issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issueID, LabelID: labelID})
unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Comment{
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeLabel,
PosterID: doerID,
IssueID: issueID,
LabelID: labelID,
}, `content=""`)
label = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Label{ID: labelID})
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedNumIssues, label.NumIssues)
assert.EqualValues(t, expectedNumClosedIssues, label.NumClosedIssues)
}
testSuccess(1, 1, 2)
testSuccess(2, 5, 2)
testSuccess(1, 1, 2) // delete non-existent IssueLabel
unittest.CheckConsistencyFor(t, &issues_model.Issue{}, &issues_model.Label{})
}