1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-12-04 10:30:19 -05:00
forgejo/models/secret/secret.go

168 lines
5.4 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2022 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package secret
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"strings"
actions_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/actions"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
actions_module "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/actions"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
secret_module "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/secret"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
"xorm.io/builder"
)
// Secret represents a secret
Clarify Actions resources ownership (#31724) Fix #31707. Also related to #31715. Some Actions resources could has different types of ownership. It could be: - global: all repos and orgs/users can use it. - org/user level: only the org/user can use it. - repo level: only the repo can use it. There are two ways to distinguish org/user level from repo level: 1. `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. 2. `{owner_id: 0, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. The first way seems more reasonable, but it may not be true. The point is that although a resource, like a runner, belongs to a repo (it can be used by the repo), the runner doesn't belong to the repo's org (other repos in the same org cannot use the runner). So, the second method makes more sense. And the first way is not user-friendly to query, we must set the repo id to zero to avoid wrong results. So, #31715 should be right. And the most simple way to fix #31707 is just: ```diff - shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) + shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, 0, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) ``` However, it is quite intuitive to set both owner id and repo id since the repo belongs to the owner. So I prefer to be compatible with it. If we get both owner id and repo id not zero when creating or finding, it's very clear that the caller want one with repo level, but set owner id accidentally. So it's OK to accept it but fix the owner id to zero. (cherry picked from commit a33e74d40d356e8f628ac06a131cb203a3609dec)
2024-08-01 05:04:04 -04:00
//
// It can be:
// 1. org/user level secret, OwnerID is org/user ID and RepoID is 0
// 2. repo level secret, OwnerID is 0 and RepoID is repo ID
//
// Please note that it's not acceptable to have both OwnerID and RepoID to be non-zero,
// or it will be complicated to find secrets belonging to a specific owner.
// For example, conditions like `OwnerID = 1` will also return secret {OwnerID: 1, RepoID: 1},
// but it's a repo level secret, not an org/user level secret.
// To avoid this, make it clear with {OwnerID: 0, RepoID: 1} for repo level secrets.
//
// Please note that it's not acceptable to have both OwnerID and RepoID to zero, global secrets are not supported.
// It's for security reasons, admin may be not aware of that the secrets could be stolen by any user when setting them as global.
type Secret struct {
ID int64
OwnerID int64 `xorm:"INDEX UNIQUE(owner_repo_name) NOT NULL"`
RepoID int64 `xorm:"INDEX UNIQUE(owner_repo_name) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0"`
Name string `xorm:"UNIQUE(owner_repo_name) NOT NULL"`
Data string `xorm:"LONGTEXT"` // encrypted data
CreatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `xorm:"created NOT NULL"`
}
// ErrSecretNotFound represents a "secret not found" error.
type ErrSecretNotFound struct {
Name string
}
func (err ErrSecretNotFound) Error() string {
return fmt.Sprintf("secret was not found [name: %s]", err.Name)
}
func (err ErrSecretNotFound) Unwrap() error {
return util.ErrNotExist
}
// InsertEncryptedSecret Creates, encrypts, and validates a new secret with yet unencrypted data and insert into database
func InsertEncryptedSecret(ctx context.Context, ownerID, repoID int64, name, data string) (*Secret, error) {
Clarify Actions resources ownership (#31724) Fix #31707. Also related to #31715. Some Actions resources could has different types of ownership. It could be: - global: all repos and orgs/users can use it. - org/user level: only the org/user can use it. - repo level: only the repo can use it. There are two ways to distinguish org/user level from repo level: 1. `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. 2. `{owner_id: 0, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. The first way seems more reasonable, but it may not be true. The point is that although a resource, like a runner, belongs to a repo (it can be used by the repo), the runner doesn't belong to the repo's org (other repos in the same org cannot use the runner). So, the second method makes more sense. And the first way is not user-friendly to query, we must set the repo id to zero to avoid wrong results. So, #31715 should be right. And the most simple way to fix #31707 is just: ```diff - shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) + shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, 0, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) ``` However, it is quite intuitive to set both owner id and repo id since the repo belongs to the owner. So I prefer to be compatible with it. If we get both owner id and repo id not zero when creating or finding, it's very clear that the caller want one with repo level, but set owner id accidentally. So it's OK to accept it but fix the owner id to zero. (cherry picked from commit a33e74d40d356e8f628ac06a131cb203a3609dec)
2024-08-01 05:04:04 -04:00
if ownerID != 0 && repoID != 0 {
// It's trying to create a secret that belongs to a repository, but OwnerID has been set accidentally.
// Remove OwnerID to avoid confusion; it's not worth returning an error here.
ownerID = 0
}
if ownerID == 0 && repoID == 0 {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: ownerID and repoID cannot be both zero, global secrets are not supported", util.ErrInvalidArgument)
}
encrypted, err := secret_module.EncryptSecret(setting.SecretKey, data)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
secret := &Secret{
OwnerID: ownerID,
RepoID: repoID,
Name: strings.ToUpper(name),
Data: encrypted,
}
return secret, db.Insert(ctx, secret)
}
func init() {
db.RegisterModel(new(Secret))
}
type FindSecretsOptions struct {
db.ListOptions
RepoID int64
Clarify Actions resources ownership (#31724) Fix #31707. Also related to #31715. Some Actions resources could has different types of ownership. It could be: - global: all repos and orgs/users can use it. - org/user level: only the org/user can use it. - repo level: only the repo can use it. There are two ways to distinguish org/user level from repo level: 1. `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. 2. `{owner_id: 0, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. The first way seems more reasonable, but it may not be true. The point is that although a resource, like a runner, belongs to a repo (it can be used by the repo), the runner doesn't belong to the repo's org (other repos in the same org cannot use the runner). So, the second method makes more sense. And the first way is not user-friendly to query, we must set the repo id to zero to avoid wrong results. So, #31715 should be right. And the most simple way to fix #31707 is just: ```diff - shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) + shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, 0, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) ``` However, it is quite intuitive to set both owner id and repo id since the repo belongs to the owner. So I prefer to be compatible with it. If we get both owner id and repo id not zero when creating or finding, it's very clear that the caller want one with repo level, but set owner id accidentally. So it's OK to accept it but fix the owner id to zero. (cherry picked from commit a33e74d40d356e8f628ac06a131cb203a3609dec)
2024-08-01 05:04:04 -04:00
OwnerID int64 // it will be ignored if RepoID is set
SecretID int64
Name string
}
func (opts FindSecretsOptions) ToConds() builder.Cond {
cond := builder.NewCond()
Clarify Actions resources ownership (#31724) Fix #31707. Also related to #31715. Some Actions resources could has different types of ownership. It could be: - global: all repos and orgs/users can use it. - org/user level: only the org/user can use it. - repo level: only the repo can use it. There are two ways to distinguish org/user level from repo level: 1. `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. 2. `{owner_id: 0, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. The first way seems more reasonable, but it may not be true. The point is that although a resource, like a runner, belongs to a repo (it can be used by the repo), the runner doesn't belong to the repo's org (other repos in the same org cannot use the runner). So, the second method makes more sense. And the first way is not user-friendly to query, we must set the repo id to zero to avoid wrong results. So, #31715 should be right. And the most simple way to fix #31707 is just: ```diff - shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) + shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, 0, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) ``` However, it is quite intuitive to set both owner id and repo id since the repo belongs to the owner. So I prefer to be compatible with it. If we get both owner id and repo id not zero when creating or finding, it's very clear that the caller want one with repo level, but set owner id accidentally. So it's OK to accept it but fix the owner id to zero. (cherry picked from commit a33e74d40d356e8f628ac06a131cb203a3609dec)
2024-08-01 05:04:04 -04:00
cond = cond.And(builder.Eq{"repo_id": opts.RepoID})
if opts.RepoID != 0 { // if RepoID is set
// ignore OwnerID and treat it as 0
cond = cond.And(builder.Eq{"owner_id": 0})
} else {
cond = cond.And(builder.Eq{"owner_id": opts.OwnerID})
}
Clarify Actions resources ownership (#31724) Fix #31707. Also related to #31715. Some Actions resources could has different types of ownership. It could be: - global: all repos and orgs/users can use it. - org/user level: only the org/user can use it. - repo level: only the repo can use it. There are two ways to distinguish org/user level from repo level: 1. `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. 2. `{owner_id: 0, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 0}` for org level. The first way seems more reasonable, but it may not be true. The point is that although a resource, like a runner, belongs to a repo (it can be used by the repo), the runner doesn't belong to the repo's org (other repos in the same org cannot use the runner). So, the second method makes more sense. And the first way is not user-friendly to query, we must set the repo id to zero to avoid wrong results. So, #31715 should be right. And the most simple way to fix #31707 is just: ```diff - shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) + shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, 0, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID) ``` However, it is quite intuitive to set both owner id and repo id since the repo belongs to the owner. So I prefer to be compatible with it. If we get both owner id and repo id not zero when creating or finding, it's very clear that the caller want one with repo level, but set owner id accidentally. So it's OK to accept it but fix the owner id to zero. (cherry picked from commit a33e74d40d356e8f628ac06a131cb203a3609dec)
2024-08-01 05:04:04 -04:00
if opts.SecretID != 0 {
cond = cond.And(builder.Eq{"id": opts.SecretID})
}
if opts.Name != "" {
cond = cond.And(builder.Eq{"name": strings.ToUpper(opts.Name)})
}
return cond
}
// UpdateSecret changes org or user reop secret.
func UpdateSecret(ctx context.Context, secretID int64, data string) error {
encrypted, err := secret_module.EncryptSecret(setting.SecretKey, data)
if err != nil {
return err
}
s := &Secret{
Data: encrypted,
}
affected, err := db.GetEngine(ctx).ID(secretID).Cols("data").Update(s)
if affected != 1 {
return ErrSecretNotFound{}
}
return err
}
func GetSecretsOfTask(ctx context.Context, task *actions_model.ActionTask) (map[string]string, error) {
secrets := map[string]string{}
secrets["GITHUB_TOKEN"] = task.Token
secrets["GITEA_TOKEN"] = task.Token
if task.Job.Run.IsForkPullRequest && task.Job.Run.TriggerEvent != actions_module.GithubEventPullRequestTarget {
// ignore secrets for fork pull request, except GITHUB_TOKEN and GITEA_TOKEN which are automatically generated.
// for the tasks triggered by pull_request_target event, they could access the secrets because they will run in the context of the base branch
// see the documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_target
return secrets, nil
}
ownerSecrets, err := db.Find[Secret](ctx, FindSecretsOptions{OwnerID: task.Job.Run.Repo.OwnerID})
if err != nil {
log.Error("find secrets of owner %v: %v", task.Job.Run.Repo.OwnerID, err)
return nil, err
}
repoSecrets, err := db.Find[Secret](ctx, FindSecretsOptions{RepoID: task.Job.Run.RepoID})
if err != nil {
log.Error("find secrets of repo %v: %v", task.Job.Run.RepoID, err)
return nil, err
}
for _, secret := range append(ownerSecrets, repoSecrets...) {
v, err := secret_module.DecryptSecret(setting.SecretKey, secret.Data)
if err != nil {
log.Error("decrypt secret %v %q: %v", secret.ID, secret.Name, err)
return nil, err
}
secrets[secret.Name] = v
}
return secrets, nil
}