1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-12-04 10:30:19 -05:00
Commit graph

1168 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Earl Warren
77ba6be1da
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.

A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.

That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.

A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.

(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)

Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go

That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.

(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)

Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.

(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)

Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation

The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition

The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.

(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)

Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)

Pettier code to set the update time of comments

Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)

XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.

(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)

Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.

When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.

This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.

(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)

Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests

Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.

The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)

Conflicts:
	services/issue/issue.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)

[this is a follow-up to PR #764]

When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.

-----

Comment:

While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...

I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
2023-11-13 12:21:09 +01:00
KN4CK3R
4f4fea734c
Unify two factor check (#27915)
Fixes #27819

We have support for two factor logins with the normal web login and with
basic auth. For basic auth the two factor check was implemented at three
different places and you need to know that this check is necessary. This
PR moves the check into the basic auth itself.
2023-11-06 08:22:39 +00:00
Jean-Baptiste Gomond
641e8165c7
Fix bad method call when deleting user secrets via API (#27829)
Fixed a little mistake when you deleting user secrets via the API. Found
it when working on #27725.
It should be backported to 1.21 I think.
2023-10-29 13:19:57 +01:00
silverwind
ce83609ff6
Upgrade to golangci-lint@v1.55.0 (#27756)
https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2023-10-24 02:54:59 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
1859bbbf91
Fix org team endpoint (#27721)
Fix #27711
2023-10-22 01:40:59 +02:00
JakobDev
3dc0c962bf
Delete repos of org when purge delete user (#27273)
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1514

I had to remove `RenameOrganization` to avoid circular import.

We should really add some foreign keys to the database.
2023-10-19 13:16:11 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
9852c92e9a
Remove unnecessary parameter (#27671) 2023-10-18 15:03:10 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
cddf245c12
Replace more db.DefaultContext (#27628)
Target #27065
2023-10-15 17:46:06 +02:00
JakobDev
76a85a4ce9
Final round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27587)
Last part of #27065
2023-10-14 08:37:24 +00:00
Evan Tobin
ae419fa494
Fix permissions for Token DELETE endpoint to match GET and POST (#27610)
Fixes #27598

In #27080, the logic for the tokens endpoints were updated to allow
admins to create and view tokens in other accounts. However, the same
functionality was not added to the DELETE endpoint. This PR makes the
DELETE endpoint function the same as the other token endpoints and adds unit tests
2023-10-14 08:04:44 +00:00
JakobDev
ebe803e514
Penultimate round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27414)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:24:07 +00:00
Michael Santos
5283ce9650
api: GetPullRequestCommits: return file list (#27483)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27481

----

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-10-09 11:22:12 +00:00
JakobDev
f2b2608a86
Don't let API add 2 exclusive labels from same scope (#27433)
Fixes #27380
2023-10-05 03:37:36 +00:00
JakobDev
cc5df26680
Even more db.DefaultContext refactor (#27352)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-10-03 10:30:41 +00:00
JakobDev
cf0df023be
More db.DefaultContext refactor (#27265)
Part of #27065

This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
2023-09-29 12:12:54 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
673cf6af76
make writing main test easier (#27270)
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-28 01:38:53 +00:00
JakobDev
7047df36d4
Another round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27103)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-09-25 13:17:37 +00:00
JakobDev
28f9b313ba
Updates to the API for archived repos (#27149) 2023-09-21 23:43:29 +00:00
Dionysios Kakouris
e46274b5b4
Fix organization field being null in POST /orgs/{orgid}/teams (#27150)
Similarly to the fix in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24694,
this addresses the team creation not returning the organization
information in the response.

This fix is connected to the
[issue](https://gitea.com/gitea/terraform-provider-gitea/issues/27)
discovered in the terraform provider.
Moreover, the
[documentation](https://docs.gitea.com/api/1.20/#tag/organization/operation/orgCreateTeam)
suggests that the response body should include the `organization` field
(currently being `null`).
2023-09-21 08:09:59 +00:00
CaiCandong
f93ee5937b
Fix token endpoints ignore specified account (#27080)
Fix #26234
close #26323
close #27040

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-09-18 00:21:15 +00:00
wxiaoguang
8531ca0837
Make SSPI auth mockable (#27036)
Before, the SSPI auth is only complied for Windows, it's difficult to
test and it breaks a lot.

Now, make the SSPI auth mockable and testable.
2023-09-17 23:32:56 +00:00
KN4CK3R
c766140dad
Add RemoteAddress to mirrors (#26952)
This PR adds a new field `RemoteAddress` to both mirror types which
contains the sanitized remote address for easier (database) access to
that information. Will be used in the audit PR if merged.
2023-09-16 16:03:02 +00:00
JakobDev
f91dbbba98
Next round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27089)
Part of #27065
2023-09-16 14:39:12 +00:00
JakobDev
c548dde205
More refactoring of db.DefaultContext (#27083)
Next step of #27065
2023-09-15 06:13:19 +00:00
JakobDev
76659b1114
Reduce usage of db.DefaultContext (#27073)
Part of #27065

This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.

Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-14 17:09:32 +00:00
JakobDev
aaeec2a392
Add missing 404 response to Swagger (#27038)
Most middleware throw a 404 in case something is not found e.g. a Repo
that is not existing. But most API endpoints don't include the 404
response in their documentation. This PR changes this.
2023-09-13 10:37:54 +08:00
KN4CK3R
591f586bf1
Extract auth middleware from service (#27028)
Related #27027

Extract the router logic from `services/auth/middleware.go` into
`routers/web` <-> `routers/common` <-> `routers/api`.
2023-09-12 08:15:16 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
e3ed67859a
Move some functions to service layer (#26969) 2023-09-08 21:09:23 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
4f32abaf94
move repository deletion to service layer (#26948)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-08 04:51:15 +00:00
CaiCandong
a78c2eae24
Replace util.SliceXxx with slices.Xxx (#26958) 2023-09-07 09:37:47 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
e97e883ad5
Add reverseproxy auth for API back with default disabled (#26703)
This feature was removed by #22219 to avoid possible CSRF attack.

This PR takes reverseproxy auth for API back but with default disabled.

To prevent possbile CSRF attack, the responsibility will be the
reverseproxy but not Gitea itself.

For those want to enable this `ENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_API`,
they should know what they are doing.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-09-07 08:31:46 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b9df9fa2e2
Move createrepository from module to service layer (#26927)
Repository creation depends on many models, so moving it to service
layer is better.
2023-09-06 12:08:51 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
540bf9fa6d
Move notification interface to services layer (#26915)
Extract from #22266
2023-09-05 18:37:47 +00:00
KN4CK3R
a99b96cbcd
Refactor secrets modification logic (#26873)
- Share code between web and api
- Add some tests
2023-09-05 15:21:02 +00:00
JakobDev
e9f5067653
Add missing reqToken() to notifications endpoints (#26914)
They currently throw a Internal Server Error when you use them without a
token. Now they correctly return a `token is required` error.

This is no security issue. If you use this endpoints with a token that
don't have the correct permission, you get the correct error. This is
not affected by this PR.
2023-09-05 14:43:34 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
f79f6a26ae
feat(API): add routes and functions for managing user's secrets (#26909)
- Add routes for creating or updating a user's actions secrets in
`routers/api/v1/api.go`
- Add a new file `routers/api/v1/user/action.go` with functions for
creating or updating a user's secrets and deleting a user's secret
- Modify the `templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl` file to include the routes
for creating or updating a user's secrets and deleting a user's secret

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-09-05 14:02:50 +00:00
Zettat123
04771b5ff7
Allow users with write permissions for issues to add attachments with API (#26837)
Fixes #24944

Since a user with write permissions for issues can add attachments to an
issue via the the web interface, the user should also be able to add
attachments via the API
2023-09-01 15:35:38 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
9eb4a9e601
feat(API): add secret deletion functionality for repository (#26808)
- Modify the `CreateOrUpdateSecret` function in `api.go` to include a
`Delete` operation for the secret
- Modify the `DeleteOrgSecret` function in `action.go` to include a
`DeleteSecret` operation for the organization
- Modify the `DeleteSecret` function in `action.go` to include a
`DeleteSecret` operation for the repository
- Modify the `v1_json.tmpl` template file to update the `operationId`
and `summary` for the `deleteSecret` operation in both the organization
and repository sections

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:02:49 +00:00
wxiaoguang
e8aae43f56
Move web/api context related testing function into a separate package (#26859)
Just like `models/unittest`, the testing helper functions should be in a
separate package: `contexttest`

And complete the TODO:

> // TODO: move this function to other packages, because it depends on
"models" package
2023-09-01 11:26:07 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
b91057b172
feat(API): add route and implementation for creating/updating repository secret (#26766)
spec:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-a-repository-secret

- Add a new route for creating or updating a secret value in a
repository
- Create a new file `routers/api/v1/repo/action.go` with the
implementation of the `CreateOrUpdateSecret` function
- Update the Swagger documentation for the `updateRepoSecret` operation
in the `v1_json.tmpl` template file

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-29 20:54:49 +00:00
Chongyi Zheng
ad43486cd3
Fix some slice append usages (#26778)
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-08-29 15:47:26 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
8cd46024fd
refactor(API): refactor secret creation and update functionality (#26751)
According to the GitHub API Spec:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-an-organization-secret

Merge the Create and Update secret into a single API.

- Remove the `CreateSecretOption` struct and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateSecretOption` in `modules/structs/secret.go`
- Update the `CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` to use `CreateOrUpdateSecretOption`
instead of `UpdateSecretOption`
- Remove the `CreateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret`
- Update the Swagger documentation in
`routers/api/v1/swagger/options.go` and `templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl`
to reflect the changes in the struct names and function names

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-28 13:08:19 +08:00
Chongyi Zheng
43652746f2
Move modules/mirror to services (#26737)
To solve the cyclic imports in a better way

Closes #20261
2023-08-27 10:24:45 +08:00
Infinoid
86ee5b4b1b
PATCH branch-protection updates check list even when checks are disabled (#26351)
Fixes: #26333.

Previously, this endpoint only updates the `StatusCheckContexts` field
when `EnableStatusCheck==true`, which makes it impossible to clear the
array otherwise.

This patch uses slice `nil`-ness to decide whether to update the list of
checks. The field is ignored when either the client explicitly passes in
a null, or just omits the field from the json ([which causes
`json.Unmarshal` to leave the struct field
unchanged](https://go.dev/play/p/Z2XHOILuB1Q)). I think this is a better
measure of intent than whether the `EnableStatusCheck` flag was set,
because it matches the semantics of other field types.

Also adds a test case. I noticed that [`testAPIEditBranchProtection`
only checks the branch
name](c1c83dbaec/tests/integration/api_branch_test.go (L68))
and no other fields, so I added some extra `GET` calls and specific
checks to make sure the fields are changing properly.

I added those checks the existing integration test; is that the right
place for it?
2023-08-24 05:36:04 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
b62c8e7765
feat(API): update and delete secret for managing organization secrets (#26660)
- Add `UpdateSecret` function to modify org or user repo secret
- Add `DeleteSecret` function to delete secret from an organization
- Add `UpdateSecretOption` struct for updating secret options
- Add `UpdateOrgSecret` function to update a secret in an organization
- Add `DeleteOrgSecret` function to delete a secret in an organization

GitHub API

1. Update Org Secret:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-an-organization-secret
2. Delete Org Secret:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#delete-an-organization-secret

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-24 02:07:00 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
23addde28e
feat: implement organization secret creation API (#26566)
- Add a new `CreateSecretOption` struct for creating secrets
- Implement a `CreateOrgSecret` function to create a secret in an
organization
- Add a new route in `api.go` to handle the creation of organization
secrets
- Update the Swagger template to include the new `CreateOrgSecret` API
endpoint

---------

Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-08-22 11:20:34 +08:00
Jason Song
b658f2c61b
Return empty when searching issues with no repos (#26545) 2023-08-17 12:42:17 -05:00
Bo-Yi Wu
79d74d208f
Add API route to list org secrets (#26485)
- Add a new function `CountOrgSecrets` in the file
`models/secret/secret.go`
- Add a new file `modules/structs/secret.go`
- Add a new function `ListActionsSecrets` in the file
`routers/api/v1/api.go`
- Add a new file `routers/api/v1/org/action.go`
- Add a new function `listActionsSecrets` in the file
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go`

go-sdk: https://gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk/pulls/629

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-15 14:32:43 +02:00
puni9869
cafce3b4b5
Allow to archive labels (#26478)
## Archived labels 

This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.

## Changes

1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB

## Outsourced for the future

There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.

## Screenshots

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/208f95cd-42e4-4ed7-9a1f-cd2050a645d4)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/746428e0-40bb-45b3-b992-85602feb371d)

Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-08-14 11:56:14 +02:00
wxiaoguang
c2e0143bfe
Introduce ctx.PathParamRaw to avoid incorrect unescaping (#26392)
Fix #26389

And complete an old TODO: `ctx.Params does un-escaping,..., which is
incorrect.`
2023-08-09 14:57:45 +08:00