As the docs of codeberg refer to the strings printed by the Forgejo
ssh servers, this is user-facing and is nice to update to the new
product name.
(cherry picked from commit 103991d73f)
(cherry picked from commit 2a0d3f85f1)
(cherry picked from commit eb2b4ce388)
(cherry picked from commit 0998b51716)
[BRANDING] forgejo log message
(cherry picked from commit d51a046ebe)
(cherry picked from commit d66e1c7b6e)
(cherry picked from commit b5bffe4ce8)
(cherry picked from commit 3fa776d856)
(cherry picked from commit 18d064f472)
(cherry picked from commit c95094e355)
(cherry picked from commit 5784290bc4)
(cherry picked from commit aee336886b)
(cherry picked from commit ec2f60b516)
(cherry picked from commit 7af742a284)
(cherry picked from commit f279e2a264)
(cherry picked from commit fd38cfb14e)
(cherry picked from commit 64c8226618)
(cherry picked from commit b546fb2304)
(cherry picked from commit ad10202177)
(cherry picked from commit c89cab9c2b)
(cherry picked from commit 9579322ec2)
(cherry picked from commit 16b44ad18d)
(cherry picked from commit 2571ff703b)
(cherry picked from commit ad61d9ce9b)
(cherry picked from commit 9b2c45d4d3)
(cherry picked from commit ed01b79a59)
(cherry picked from commit d040b66427)
(cherry picked from commit ffe0bbea48)
(cherry picked from commit 4c1b2c409b)
(cherry picked from commit 3d8338ed10)
(cherry picked from commit a92f044ea9)
[BRANDING] link to forgejo.org/docs instead of docs.gitea.io
(cherry picked from commit 3efafd0e08)
(cherry picked from commit 148185e34b)
(cherry picked from commit 834e264698)
(cherry picked from commit e72fa6eb1e)
[BRANDING] link to forgejo.org/docs instead of docs.gitea.io
Fix the link that was 404.
(cherry picked from commit ae515d7258)
(cherry picked from commit facc2367f0)
(cherry picked from commit 25784b9f21)
(cherry picked from commit 2efc6138d9)
(cherry picked from commit b9d0871631)
(cherry picked from commit f0446e51b9)
(cherry picked from commit 1638aa67fb)
(cherry picked from commit 290db6a018)
(cherry picked from commit 89b87cf542)
(cherry picked from commit 656ed94962)
(cherry picked from commit 036f879f96)
(cherry picked from commit 69eea35f81)
(cherry picked from commit b72e3f4a92)
(cherry picked from commit af606b8574)
(cherry picked from commit 7e47f8135c)
(cherry picked from commit 0e5218cc53)
(cherry picked from commit 7c2a20a528)
(cherry picked from commit 4e94006363)
(cherry picked from commit e47cdfc43f)
(cherry picked from commit 1dcb3e1da4)
(cherry picked from commit 67367c4e0f)
(cherry picked from commit 252087d1ff)
(cherry picked from commit f5977a43e5)
Conflicts:
templates/base/head_navbar.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit 594938eb15)
(cherry picked from commit 0257d038a7)
(cherry picked from commit 72821dd140)
[BRANDING] s/gitea/forgejo/ in HTML placeholders
Replaced Gitea branding with Forgejo for input placeholders
Closes: #686
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/752
(cherry picked from commit 6160d37ca9)
(cherry picked from commit df61138c7e)
(cherry picked from commit 1f30566c3f)
(cherry picked from commit 539bb825f5)
(cherry picked from commit bee0f66c86)
(cherry picked from commit 60ad005c95)
(cherry picked from commit 282e26222e)
(cherry picked from commit f9ca551f3d)
(cherry picked from commit b2e04b04c3)
(cherry picked from commit c8f395a03c)
(cherry picked from commit 0d58ce49ae)
(cherry picked from commit c602ddf91e)
(cherry picked from commit 029e37271e)
(cherry picked from commit fdaa96b3cc)
(cherry picked from commit 515d99e27d)
(cherry picked from commit da73274ba1)
(cherry picked from commit ce90b696a0)
(cherry picked from commit b6bf98763b)
(cherry picked from commit 5b380d22d7)
[BRANDING] How to start a runner: URL to Actions admin documentation
(cherry picked from commit da91799e6f)
(cherry picked from commit 28231663b6)
(cherry picked from commit 533a90345b)
(cherry picked from commit 6a0e4e55dd)
(cherry picked from commit f47cd611c6)
(cherry picked from commit 001264b784)
(cherry picked from commit e4099e9bb9)
(cherry picked from commit 3a1885649f)
(cherry picked from commit c42802c710)
(cherry picked from commit a611ce8d6d)
(cherry picked from commit a3d7d10a80)
(cherry picked from commit 52adde671f)
(cherry picked from commit c9a3820fef)
(cherry picked from commit dce40997c9)
(cherry picked from commit 312a6b92f3)
[BRANDING] package templates & links
- Change Gitea to Forgejo where necessary.
- Point all documentation to Forgejo's documentation.
- Resolves #992
(cherry picked from commit d0b78a6ede)
(cherry picked from commit e2382f30ba)
(cherry picked from commit c41cf05a33)
(cherry picked from commit 797e598ae7)
(cherry picked from commit 970031a1c2)
(cherry picked from commit 0c1180e2e1)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/alpine.tmpl
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
templates/package/content/chef.tmpl
templates/package/content/composer.tmpl
templates/package/content/conan.tmpl
templates/package/content/conda.tmpl
templates/package/content/container.tmpl
templates/package/content/cran.tmpl
templates/package/content/debian.tmpl
templates/package/content/generic.tmpl
templates/package/content/go.tmpl
templates/package/content/helm.tmpl
templates/package/content/maven.tmpl
templates/package/content/npm.tmpl
templates/package/content/nuget.tmpl
templates/package/content/pub.tmpl
templates/package/content/pypi.tmpl
templates/package/content/rpm.tmpl
templates/package/content/rubygems.tmpl
templates/package/content/swift.tmpl
templates/package/content/vagrant.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit 42ac9ff2ab)
(cherry picked from commit e390000bce)
(cherry picked from commit 56a437b29b)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1466
[BRANDING] s/Gitea/Forgejo/ in user visible help & comments
- Modify the README of the docker directory to point to the relevant
docker files and documentation for Forgejo.
(cherry picked from commit aca6371215)
(cherry picked from commit 0ba96b1bc4)
(cherry picked from commit 5c8e6b53f1)
Conflicts:
docker/README.md
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit b3121c8004)
(cherry picked from commit 607f870416)
(cherry picked from commit 191d96afe4)
[BRANDING] healthcheck/check.go
(cherry picked from commit d703a236ce)
(cherry picked from commit d84ce3ff20)
(cherry picked from commit 2dbb844606)
(cherry picked from commit 14d3ae7e3a)
[BRANDING] s/Gitea/Forgejo/g in CLI output
(cherry picked from commit 7543c126bb)
(cherry picked from commit b66f422fc3)
(cherry picked from commit a81e4e46f3)
[BRANDING] Gitea->Forgejo in mailer code
(cherry picked from commit b91afea4ff)
(cherry picked from commit 5d7428167c)
(cherry picked from commit ed8101ba6c)
[BRANDING] use 'Forgejo' for Discord, Packagist, and Slack webhooks
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1387
(cherry picked from commit 7dc3a05f5b)
(cherry picked from commit 133f2fc6cc)
[BRANDING] cmd/manager.go
(cherry picked from commit d1dba2c79d)
[BRANDING] pyproject.toml
(cherry picked from commit 7e8c868db2)
(cherry picked from commit 2395995c8b)
(cherry picked from commit dd6fbbf332)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1548
(cherry picked from commit 6f9a5d5cab)
(cherry picked from commit d0635c4a07)
(cherry picked from commit 5f9a8c5744)
(cherry picked from commit 10b96c4567)
(cherry picked from commit 717d52e928)
(cherry picked from commit 5debdb103e)
(cherry picked from commit ded1c1700e)
(cherry picked from commit 52aa23cf7a)
(cherry picked from commit 882c942b06)
- This is a 'front-port' of the already existing patch on v1.21 and
v1.20, but applied on top of what Gitea has done to rework the LTA
mechanism. Forgejo will stick with the reworked mechanism by the Forgejo
Security team for the time being. The removal of legacy code (AES-GCM) has been
left out.
- The current architecture is inherently insecure, because you can
construct the 'secret' cookie value with values that are available in
the database. Thus provides zero protection when a database is
dumped/leaked.
- This patch implements a new architecture that's inspired from: [Paragonie Initiative](https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies).
- Integration testing is added to ensure the new mechanism works.
- Removes a setting, because it's not used anymore.
(cherry picked from commit e3d6622a63)
(cherry picked from commit fef1a6dac5)
(cherry picked from commit b0c5165145)
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)
[this is a follow-up to PR #764]
When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.
-----
Comment:
While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...
I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686)
- Currently there's code to recover gracefully from panics that happen
within the execution of cron tasks. However this recover code wasn't
being run, because `RunWithShutdownContext` also contains code to
recover from any panic and then gracefully shutdown Forgejo. Because
`RunWithShutdownContext` registers that code as last, that would get run
first which in this case is not behavior that we want.
- Move the recover code to inside the function, so that is run first
before `RunWithShutdownContext`'s recover code (which is now a noop).
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1910
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Fix #28056
This PR will check whether the repo has zero branch when pushing a
branch. If that, it means this repository hasn't been synced.
The reason caused that is after user upgrade from v1.20 -> v1.21, he
just push branches without visit the repository user interface. Because
all repositories routers will check whether a branches sync is necessary
but push has not such check.
For every repository, it has two states, synced or not synced. If there
is zero branch for a repository, then it will be assumed as non-sync
state. Otherwise, it's synced state. So if we think it's synced, we just
need to update branch/insert new branch. Otherwise do a full sync. So
that, for every push, there will be almost no extra load added. It's
high performance than yours.
For the implementation, we in fact will try to update the branch first,
if updated success with affect records > 0, then all are done. Because
that means the branch has been in the database. If no record is
affected, that means the branch does not exist in database. So there are
two possibilities. One is this is a new branch, then we just need to
insert the record. Another is the branches haven't been synced, then we
need to sync all the branches into database.
The function `GetByBean` has an obvious defect that when the fields are
empty values, it will be ignored. Then users will get a wrong result
which is possibly used to make a security problem.
To avoid the possibility, this PR removed function `GetByBean` and all
references.
And some new generic functions have been introduced to be used.
The recommand usage like below.
```go
// if query an object according id
obj, err := db.GetByID[Object](ctx, id)
// query with other conditions
obj, err := db.Get[Object](ctx, builder.Eq{"a": a, "b":b})
```
- Push commits updates are run in a queue and updates can come from less
traceable places such as Git over SSH, therefor add more information
about on which repository the pushUpdate failed.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1723
(cherry picked from commit 37ab946039)
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Changed behavior to calculate package quota limit using package `creator
ID` instead of `owner ID`.
Currently, users are allowed to create an unlimited number of
organizations, each of which has its own package limit quota, resulting
in the ability for users to have unlimited package space in different
organization scopes. This fix will calculate package quota based on
`package version creator ID` instead of `package version owner ID`
(which might be organization), so that users are not allowed to take
more space than configured package settings.
Also, there is a side case in which users can publish packages to a
specific package version, initially published by different user, taking
that user package size quota. Version in fix should be better because
the total amount of space is limited to the quota for users sharing the
same organization scope.
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1458
Some mails such as issue creation mails are missing the reply-to-comment
address. This PR fixes that and specifies which comment types should get
a reply-possibility.
Fixes #27819
We have support for two factor logins with the normal web login and with
basic auth. For basic auth the two factor check was implemented at three
different places and you need to know that this check is necessary. This
PR moves the check into the basic auth itself.
- On user deletion, delete action runners that the user has created.
- Add a database consistency check to remove action runners that have
nonexistent belonging owner.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1720
(cherry picked from commit 009ca7223d)
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
The steps to reproduce it.
First, create a new oauth2 source.
Then, a user login with this oauth2 source.
Disable the oauth2 source.
Visit users -> settings -> security, 500 will be displayed.
This is because this page only load active Oauth2 sources but not all
Oauth2 sources.
After many refactoring PRs for the "locale" and "template context
function", now the ".locale" is not needed for web templates any more.
This PR does a clean up for:
1. Remove `ctx.Data["locale"]` for web context.
2. Use `ctx.Locale` in `500.tmpl`, for consistency.
3. Add a test check for `500 page` locale usage.
4. Remove the `Str2html` and `DotEscape` from mail template context
data, they are copy&paste errors introduced by #19169 and #16200 . These
functions are template functions (provided by the common renderer), but
not template data variables.
5. Make email `SendAsync` function mockable (I was planning to add more
tests but it would make this PR much too complex, so the tests could be
done in another PR)
Due to a bug in the GitLab API, the diff_refs field is populated in the
response when fetching an individual merge request, but not when
fetching a list of them. That field is used to populate the merge base
commit SHA.
While there is detection for the merge base even when not populated by
the downloader, that detection is not flawless. Specifically, when a
GitLab merge request has a single commit, and gets merged with the
squash strategy, the base branch will be fast-forwarded instead of a
separate squash or merge commit being created. The merge base detection
attempts to find the last commit on the base branch that is also on the
PR branch, but in the fast-forward case that is the PR's only commit.
Assuming the head commit is also the merge base results in the import of
a PR with 0 commits and no diff.
This PR uses the individual merge request endpoint to fetch merge
request data with the diff_refs field. With its data, the base merge
commit can be properly set, which—by not relying on the detection
mentioned above—correctly imports PRs that were "merged" by
fast-forwarding the base branch.
ref: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/29620
Before this PR, the PR migration code populates Gitea's MergedCommitID
field by using GitLab's merge_commit_sha field. However, that field is
only populated when the PR was merged using a merge strategy. When a
squash strategy is used, squash_commit_sha is populated instead.
Given that Gitea does not keep track of merge and squash commits
separately, this PR simply populates Gitea's MergedCommitID by using
whichever field is present in the GitLab API response.
Hello there,
Cargo Index over HTTP is now prefered over git for package updates: we
should not force users who do not need the GIT repo to have the repo
created/updated on each publish (it can still be created in the packages
settings).
The current behavior when publishing is to check if the repo exist and
create it on the fly if not, then update it's content.
Cargo HTTP Index does not rely on the repo itself so this will be
useless for everyone not using the git protocol for cargo registry.
This PR only disable the creation on the fly of the repo when publishing
a crate.
This is linked to #26844 (error 500 when trying to publish a crate if
user is missing write access to the repo) because it's now optional.
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
When `webhook.PROXY_URL` has been set, the old code will check if the
proxy host is in `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` or reject requests through the
proxy. It requires users to add the proxy host to `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST`.
However, it actually allows all requests to any port on the host, when
the proxy host is probably an internal address.
But things may be even worse. `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` doesn't really work
when requests are sent to the allowed proxy, and the proxy could forward
them to any hosts.
This PR fixes it by:
- If the proxy has been set, always allow connectioins to the host and
port.
- Check `ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` before forwarding.
Closes #27455
> The mechanism responsible for long-term authentication (the 'remember
me' cookie) uses a weak construction technique. It will hash the user's
hashed password and the rands value; it will then call the secure cookie
code, which will encrypt the user's name with the computed hash. If one
were able to dump the database, they could extract those two values to
rebuild that cookie and impersonate a user. That vulnerability exists
from the date the dump was obtained until a user changed their password.
>
> To fix this security issue, the cookie could be created and verified
using a different technique such as the one explained at
https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies.
The PR removes the now obsolete setting `COOKIE_USERNAME`.
