This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.
Fix #15367
Replaces #23070
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.
We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.
Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.
> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
>
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
>
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
>
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
>
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
The Repolist contains the Number of Stars and Forks. Now these Numbers
are a Link to the corresponding pages of the Repo.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.
## Screenshots
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
We can reuse the recently created subtemplate here. I also checked the
whole templates for similar constructs, these appear to be the only one.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. non-dev mode is treated as prod mode, to protect users from
accidentally running in dev mode if there is a typo in this value.
2. in dev mode, do not need to really exit if there are template errors,
because the template errors could be fixed by developer soon and the
templates get reloaded, help:
* https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24845#issuecomment-1557615382
3. Fine tune the mail template loading message.
- Replace `<table>` with flexbox
- Add issue modification time and issue number
- Remove big title
- Replace tabs with menu items
- Add clicked item deletion on back button cache restoration
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321
Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.
Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.
After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
Inspired by
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24530#issuecomment-1558815301
This PR use a file filter action to do different CI jobs according
changed files types. All types are defined in
`.github/file-filters.yml`. Now there are 4 types, `docs`, `backend`,
`frontend` and `build`. Then if a PR only changed docs files, those CI
jobs which passed the conditions will run, and other types are also like
this.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
The cheat sheet uses the `asciidoc` markup language to demonstrate how
to set up third party markup renderers. The current example has the
following issues:
- It promotes a legacy tool that does not handle modern AsciiDoc
specifications
- It does not account for embedded preview renders
- It has no safety restrictions
By switching to `asciidoctor`, uses are suggested to utilize de
facto/standard tooling for AsciiDoc.
The `--embedded` parameter will strip out HTML tags that contain the
document (such as `<html></html>`) which aren't necessary for the
render, and actually end up as text in the document if left in.
The `--safe-mode` parameter (of which there are several profiles)
imposes [certain
policies](https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoctor/latest/safe-modes/)
on the files it ingests and what the resulting output looks like. GitHub
itself uses the `secure` profile (the highest), which can be a good
starting point for those who are uncertain of what to do. By default, if
no mode is specified when `asciidoctor` runs it defaults to `unsafe`,
i.e. no safety guidelines at all.
Hi all,
I've very much enjoyed working on Gitea and was hoping to make it
official by requesting maintainership. :) Excited to see what the future
holds for this project.
My [merged PRs
list](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Aphilip-peterson+is%3Amerged+)
Cheers,
Phil
---------
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Currently if pull requests are disabled on a fork but enabled on a base
repo, creating/editing/deleting files does not offer the option to
create a pull request. This change enables creating a pull request for
the base repo in that case.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Fix #24896
If users set different languages by `linguist-language`, the `stats` map
could be: `java: 100, Java: 200`.
Language stats are stored as case-insensitive in database and there is a
unique key.
So, the different language names should be merged to one unique name:
`Java: 300`
Very small UX change, "confusable" is a word that is indeed valid, but
when you look it up online, it doesn't take long for this adjective to
appear in [its technical Unicode-related
context](https://util.unicode.org/UnicodeJsps/confusables.jsp). I think
that it throws me off as a person that doesn't speak English natively.
I think that this could be replaced with "can be confused with". As the
change is very small and purely a matter of preference, if you (the
maintainer) believe that this shouldn't be included, feel free to close
this without any further discussion, as your time would probably be
better used elsewhere.
Replace #19857
Close #19856
Close #10311
Close #10123
Major changes:
1. Move a lot of code from `environment-to-ini.go` to `config_env.go` to
make them testable.
2. Add `__FILE` support
3. Update documents
4. Add tests
Close #13454 , Close #23255, Close #14697 (and maybe more related
issues)
Many users have the requirement to customize the git config. This PR
introduces an easy way: put the options in Gitea's app.ini
`[git.config]`, then the config options will be applied to git config.
And it can support more flexible default config values, eg: now
`diff.algorithm=histogram` by default. According to:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/32367597/4754037 , `histogram diff` is
efficient and doesn't like to cause server-side problems.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Fix #24882
The goroutines are all asynchronized. So it needs a little "sleep" to
make sure the writer's goroutine has been paused before sending messages
to it.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Previously, the `CONTRIBUTING` was severely outdated in certain aspects
such as workflows.
These sections have been brought up to date.
Furthermore, the `CONTRIBUTING` now mentions the TOC, how it is
structured, elected, and its duties.
---------
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fix #24856
Rename "context.contextKey" to "context.WebContextKey", this context is
for web context only. But the Context itself is not renamed, otherwise
it would cause a lot of changes (if we really want to rename it, there
could be a separate PR).
The old test code doesn't really test, the "install page" gets broken
not only one time, so use new test code to make sure the "install page"
could work.
