1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-11-27 09:11:53 -05:00
Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gusted
dd2414f226
[GITEA] Use maintained gziphandler
- https://github.com/NYTimes/gziphandler doesn't seems to be maintained
anymore and Forgejo already includes
https://github.com/klauspost/compress which provides a maintained and
faster gzip handler fork.
- Enables Jitter to prevent BREACH attacks, as this *seems* to be
possible in the context of Forgejo.

(cherry picked from commit cc2847241d)
(cherry picked from commit 99ba56a876)

Conflicts:
	go.sum
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1581
(cherry picked from commit 711638193d)
(cherry picked from commit 9c12a37fde)
(cherry picked from commit 91191aaaed)
(cherry picked from commit 72be417f84)
(cherry picked from commit 98497c84da)
(cherry picked from commit fba042adb5)
2023-11-13 14:06:31 +01:00
wxiaoguang
4e2f1ee58d
Refactor web package and context package (#25298)
1. The "web" package shouldn't depends on "modules/context" package,
instead, let each "web context" register themselves to the "web"
package.
2. The old Init/Free doesn't make sense, so simplify it
* The ctx in "Init(ctx)" is never used, and shouldn't be used that way
* The "Free" is never called and shouldn't be called because the SSPI
instance is shared

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-18 09:59:09 +02:00
wxiaoguang
abcf5a7b5e
Fix install page context, make the install page tests really test (#24858)
Fix #24856

Rename "context.contextKey" to "context.WebContextKey", this context is
for web context only. But the Context itself is not renamed, otherwise
it would cause a lot of changes (if we really want to rename it, there
could be a separate PR).

The old test code doesn't really test, the "install page" gets broken
not only one time, so use new test code to make sure the "install page"
could work.
2023-05-23 09:29:15 +08:00
wxiaoguang
6b33152b7d
Decouple the different contexts from each other (#24786)
Replace #16455

Close #21803

Mixing different Gitea contexts together causes some problems:

1. Unable to respond proper content when error occurs, eg: Web should
respond HTML while API should respond JSON
2. Unclear dependency, eg: it's unclear when Context is used in
APIContext, which fields should be initialized, which methods are
necessary.


To make things clear, this PR introduces a Base context, it only
provides basic Req/Resp/Data features.

This PR mainly moves code. There are still many legacy problems and
TODOs in code, leave unrelated changes to future PRs.
2023-05-21 09:50:53 +08:00
wxiaoguang
92fd3fc4fd
Refactor "route" related code, fix Safari cookie bug (#24330)
Fix #24176

Clean some misuses of route package, clean some legacy FIXMEs

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-27 02:06:45 -04:00
wxiaoguang
b9a97ccd0e
Refactor web route (#24080)
The old code is unnecessarily complex, and has many misuses.

Old code "wraps" a lot, wrap wrap wrap, it's difficult to understand
which kind of handler is used.

The new code uses a general approach, we do not need to write all kinds
of handlers into the "wrapper", do not need to wrap them again and
again.

New code, there are only 2 concepts:

1. HandlerProvider: `func (h any) (handlerProvider func (next)
http.Handler)`, it can be used as middleware
2. Use HandlerProvider to get the final HandlerFunc, and use it for
`r.Get()`


And we can decouple the route package from context package (see the
TODO).

# FAQ

## Is `reflect` safe?

Yes, all handlers are checked during startup, see the `preCheckHandler`
comment. If any handler is wrong, developers could know it in the first
time.

## Does `reflect` affect performance?

No. https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24080#discussion_r1164825901

1. This reflect code only runs for each web handler call, handler is far
more slower: 10ms-50ms
2. The reflect is pretty fast (comparing to other code): 0.000265ms
3. XORM has more reflect operations already
2023-04-20 14:49:06 -04:00