Paths in git are always separated by `/` not `\` - therefore we should
`path` and not `filepath`
Fix #21987
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Provide a new type to make it easier to parse a ref name.
Actually, it's picked up from #21937, to make the origin PR lighter.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
A complement to #21985.
I overlooked it because the name of the switch is `StartServer`, not
`Enabled`. I believe the weird name is a legacy, but renaming is out of
scope.
Fixes #21865.
Scheme-based normalization ([RFC 3986, section
6.2.3](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#section-6.2.3)) was
already implemented, but only for `defaultAppURL`.
This PR implements the same for `AppURL`.
Signed-off-by: Saswat Padhi <saswatpadhi@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
`hex.EncodeToString` has better performance than `fmt.Sprintf("%x",
[]byte)`, we should use it as much as possible.
I'm not an extreme fan of performance, so I think there are some
exceptions:
- `fmt.Sprintf("%x", func(...)[N]byte())`
- We can't slice the function return value directly, and it's not worth
adding lines.
```diff
func A()[20]byte { ... }
- a := fmt.Sprintf("%x", A())
- a := hex.EncodeToString(A()[:]) // invalid
+ tmp := A()
+ a := hex.EncodeToString(tmp[:])
```
- `fmt.Sprintf("%X", []byte)`
- `strings.ToUpper(hex.EncodeToString(bytes))` has even worse
performance.
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Unfortunately the fallback configuration code for [mailer] that were
added in #18982 are incorrect. When you read a value from an ini section
that key is added. This leads to a failure of the fallback mechanism.
Further there is also a spelling mistake in the startTLS configuration.
This PR restructures the mailer code to first map the deprecated
settings on to the new ones - and then use ini.MapTo to map those on to
the struct with additional validation as necessary.
Ref #21744
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
The hashchange event did not fire on re-click of a active anchor.
Instead, use the click event which always fires.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21680
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
If a deleted-branch has already been restored, a request to restore it
again will cause a NPE. This PR adds detection for this case, but also
disables buttons when they're clicked in order to help prevent
accidental repeat requests.
Fix #21930
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
This PR addresses #19586
I added a mutex to the upload version creation which will prevent the
push errors when two requests try to create these database entries. I'm
not sure if this should be the final solution for this problem.
I added a workaround to allow a reupload of missing blobs. Normally a
reupload is skipped because the database knows the blob is already
present. The workaround checks if the blob exists on the file system.
This should not be needed anymore with the above fix so I marked this
code to be removed with Gitea v1.20.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
When starting a scroll while the mouse is over a mermaid diagram, the
scroll sometimes propagates to the iframe, preventing the parent page
from scrolling. Fix this by disabling scroll inside the iframe. This is
not a problem because those frames are never meant to scroll. Bug seems
to affect Firefox only.
This patch:
- Use `<button>` replace anchor link `<a>` in **_Delete/Restore
Branch_** button to avoid unexpected page jump before restore branch
actually done.
- Also replace right side buttons with `<button>` in branch list, let
some screen readers know they are buttons.
## Before
click restore branch -> restore triggered -> page refreshed, but branch
status not update -> manually refresh page
<details>
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/76462613/197389108-5a0bd259-0455-40b2-92ac-4326900276f8.mp4
</details>
## After
waiting restore done -> page refresh -> branch status update
<details>
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/76462613/197428683-616fcbd2-70f9-4572-bf76-e0b7f77b6dd7.mp4
</details>
Signed-off-by: baronbunny <its@baronbunny.cn>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
- Fix regression from #21893 which had misaligned a few tables like repo
lists and e-mails
- Bring githooks list in line with webhooks list for styling
- Change webhook list icons to just colored dots, like githook list
- Increase size of dot in webhook and githook list from 16 to 22px
Committer avatar rendered by `func AvatarByEmail` are not vertical align
as `func Avatar` does.
- Replace literals `ui avatar` and `ui avatar vm` with the constant
`DefaultAvatarClass`
When re-retrieving hook tasks from the DB double check if they have not
been delivered in the meantime. Further ensure that tasks are marked as
delivered when they are being delivered.
In addition:
* Improve the error reporting and make sure that the webhook task
population script runs in a separate goroutine.
* Only get hook task IDs out of the DB instead of the whole task when
repopulating the queue
* When repopulating the queue make the DB request paged
Ref #17940
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Unfortunately #21549 changed the name of Testcases without changing
their associated fixture directories.
Fix #21854
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This PR adds a button to allow quickly clearing the merge message of a
PR. The button will remove everything but the git trailers.
I found myself often pruning the commit message before merging,
especially for PRs generated by renovate - renovate puts a very long and
detailed comment with the full changelog in each PR it opens. This
clutters the commit message. However, I want to explicitly preserve the
git commit trailers. Doing this manually works, but having a button is a
lot easier.
Screenshot:
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Although git does expect that author names should be of the form: `NAME
<EMAIL>` some users have been able to create commits with: `<EMAIL>`
Fix #21900
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This should eliminate all non-variable color usage in the styles, making
gitea fully themeable via CSS variables. Also, it adds a linter to
enforce variables for colors.
Enable this to require captcha validation for user login. You also must
enable `ENABLE_CAPTCHA`.
Summary:
- Consolidate CAPTCHA template
- add CAPTCHA handle and context
- add `REQUIRE_CAPTCHA_FOR_LOGIN` config and docs
- Consolidate CAPTCHA set-up and verification code
Partially resolved #6049
Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Fix #20456
At some point during the 1.17 cycle abbreviated refishs to issue
branches started breaking. This is likely due serious inconsistencies in
our management of refs throughout Gitea - which is a bug needing to be
addressed in a different PR. (Likely more than one)
We should try to use non-abbreviated `fullref`s as much as possible.
That is where a user has inputted a abbreviated `refish` we should add
`refs/heads/` if it is `branch` etc. I know people keep writing and
merging PRs that remove prefixes from stored content but it is just
wrong and it keeps causing problems like this. We should only remove the
prefix at the time of
presentation as the prefix is the only way of knowing umambiguously and
permanently if the `ref` is referring to a `branch`, `tag` or `commit` /
`SHA`. We need to make it so that every ref has the appropriate prefix,
and probably also need to come up with some definitely unambiguous way
of storing `SHA`s if they're used in a `ref` or `refish` field. We must
not store a potentially
ambiguous `refish` as a `ref`. (Especially when referring a `tag` -
there is no reason why users cannot create a `branch` with the same
short name as a `tag` and vice versa and any attempt to prevent this
will fail. You can even create a `branch` and a
`tag` that matches the `SHA` pattern.)
To that end in order to fix this bug, when parsing issue templates check
the provided `Ref` (here a `refish` because almost all users do not know
or understand the subtly), if it does not start with `refs/` add the
`BranchPrefix` to it. This allows people to make their templates refer
to a `tag` but not to a `SHA` directly. (I don't think that is
particularly unreasonable but if people disagree I can make the `refish`
be checked to see if it matches the `SHA` pattern.)
Next we need to handle the issue links that are already written. The
links here are created with `git.RefURL`
Here we see there is a bug introduced in #17551 whereby the provided
`ref` argument can be double-escaped so we remove the incorrect external
escape. (The escape added in #17551 is in the right place -
unfortunately I missed that the calling function was doing the wrong
thing.)
Then within `RefURL()` we check if an unprefixed `ref` (therefore
potentially a `refish`) matches the `SHA` pattern before assuming that
is actually a `commit` - otherwise is assumed to be a `branch`. This
will handle most of the problem cases excepting the very unusual cases
where someone has deliberately written a `branch` to look like a `SHA1`.
But please if something is called a `ref` or interpreted as a `ref` make
it a full-ref before storing or using it. By all means if something is a
`branch` assume the prefix is removed but always add it back in if you
are using it as a `ref`. Stop storing abbreviated `branch` names and
`tag` names - which are `refish` as a `ref`. It will keep on causing
problems like this.
Fix #20456
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
My pull request changes the logging documentation that is visible here:
https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/logging-configuration/
The reason behind the changes is that for some time I've found the
logging documentation confusing, and wanted to give a try at making it
more clear.
---
If you find the existing changes to be ok, please don't merge yet, as I
have further ideas which I want to discuss with you before making the
changes.
### Swap the "Log Groups" and "Log outputs" sections.
I want to move the "Log outputs" section before the "Log Groups"
section. The reason is that the "Log Groups" section refers to ini
sections that are only later explained, and to concepts that are general
and should be documented in "Log outputs" or a different section.
This change is essentially a swap of the "Log Groups" and "Log outputs"
sections. That way the doumentation would follow the structure in which
the ini file is built: first explaining the outer sections, and then the
inner ones ([log], [log.name], [log.name.default], ...)
### Explain the workings of ambigous settings below the settings listing
Right now the basics of a setting is shown later than the explanation of
its special workings, for example with `FILE_NAME` at [the file output
mode](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/logging-configuration/#file-mode)
(well, if the first changes are taken into account).
Currently I have `TODO` witten at 2 settings, which I have to figure out
how do they exactly work before I can document them.
### New section about [log]
New section after "Collecting Logs for Help" about how the top level
[log] itself works and what can go there.
Currently, variables that directly go into [log] are noted throughout
the whole document.
---
Please let me know what you think about the changes.
A counterargument that I myself see is that some of this is already
present in the cheatsheet, but I think it would be better to have [this
document](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/logging-configuration/) as a
throrough explanation of how logging is configured, and the cheatsheet
would only have a short outline of the possible sections and variables.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
