* Allow compare page to look up base, head, own-fork, forkbase-of-head
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* as per @guillep2k
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Update routers/repo/compare.go
* as per @guillep2k
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Rationalise the names a little
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Rationalise the names a little (2)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Fix 500 with fork of fork
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Prevent 500 on compare different trees
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* dotdotdot is perfectly valid in both usernames and repo names
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* ensure we can set the head and base repos too
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* ensure we can set the head and base repos too (2)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fix lint
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* only set headRepo == baseRepo if isSameRepo
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Correctly set the organization num repos
Correctly set the organization num repos to the number of
accessible repos for the user
Fix #11194
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* as per @lunny
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* attempt to fix mssql
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Update models/user.go
* Explicit columns
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add test and fix 0 counted orgs
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* remove orgname from api
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Allow Git ref for /repos/{owner}/{repo}/git/commits/{sha}
* Consolidate API for getting single commit
* Fix tests and do it differently
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
If user create pull review through api but not set CommitID,
I think it's necessary to use last headCommitID as default seting,
or this review will be considered as stale review which is wrong
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Although default branch is not offered for deletion in the templates, we need to prevent it both at the router level and in the pre-receive hook.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* routers: make /compare route available to unauthenticated users
Remove some bits of the compare interface if the user isn't signed in.
Notably, they don't need to see the "New Pull Request" button box nor the
hidden form that would fail to submit due to the POST request continuing to
require proper privileges.
Follow-up commits will improve the UI a bit around this, removing some
"Pull Request" verbiage in favor of "Compare."
* ui: home: show "compare" button for unauthenticated users
This change requires pulling in the BaseRepo unconditionally and
recording if the pull request is in-fact not allowed
(.PullRequestCtx.Allowed). If the user isn't allowed to create a pull
request, either because this isn't a fork or same-fork branch PRs aren't
allowed, then we'll name the button "Compare" instead of "Pull Request."
* ui: branch list: use the new Compare language when available
When viewing the branch listing as an unauthenticated user, you'll get
"Pull Request" buttons. use the new "Compare" verbiage instead, which
matches GitHub behavior when you can't issue a pull request from the
branches.
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously, this required authentication, but there's not actually
any privileged information on this page. Move the endpoint out of
the group that requires sign-in. It still requires the ability to
read issues and pull requests, so private repositories (for instance)
will not be exposed.
Fixes #10312
Fixes #11233
* Fix creation of Org repos
Fix go-gitea#9269
* Change variable name to appease linter
* Update PR with suggestions
Add a note for user.CanCreateRepo() about failure assumptions
Change repo.create help message
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Don't allow registration via the web form, when AllowOnlyExternalRegistration is True
* Show Disabled Registration message if DisableRegistration or AllowOnlyExternalRegistration options are true
* Support unicode emojis and remove emojify.js
This PR replaces all use of emojify.js and adds unicode emoji support to various areas of gitea.
This works in a few ways:
First it adds emoji parsing support into gitea itself. This allows us to
* Render emojis from valid alias (😄)
* Detect unicode emojis and let us put them in their own class with proper aria-labels and styling
* Easily allow for custom "emoji"
* Support all emoji rendering and features without javascript
* Uses plain unicode and lets the system render in appropriate emoji font
* Doesn't leave us relying on external sources for updates/fixes/features
That same list of emoji is also used to create a json file which replaces the part of emojify.js that populates the emoji search tribute. This file is about 35KB with GZIP turned on and I've set it to load after the page renders to not hinder page load time (and this removes loading emojify.js also)
For custom "emoji" it uses a pretty simple scheme of just looking for /emojis/img/name.png where name is something a user has put in the "allowed reactions" setting we already have. The gitea reaction that was previously hard coded into a forked copy of emojify.js is included and works as a custom reaction under this method.
The emoji data sourced here is from https://github.com/github/gemoji which is the gem library Github uses for their emoji rendering (and a data source for other sites). So we should be able to easily render any emoji and :alias: that Github can, removing any errors from migrated content. They also update it as well, so we can sync when there are new unicode emoji lists released.
I've included a slimmed down and slightly modified forked copy of https://github.com/knq/emoji to make up our own emoji module. The code is pretty straight forward and again allows us to have a lot of flexibility in what happens.
I had seen a few comments about performance in some of the other threads if we render this ourselves, but there doesn't seem to be any issue here. In a test it can parse, convert, and render 1,000 emojis inside of a large markdown table in about 100ms on my laptop (which is many more emojis than will ever be in any normal issue). This also prevents any flickering and other weirdness from using javascript to render some things while using go for others.
Not included here are image fall back URLS. I don't really think they are necessary for anything new being written in 2020. However, managing the emoji ourselves would allow us to add these as a feature later on if it seems necessary.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/9182
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/8974
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/8953
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/6628
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/5130
* add new shared function emojiHTML
* don't increase emoji size in issue title
* Update templates/repo/issue/view_content/add_reaction.tmpl
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Support for emoji rendering in various templates
* Render code and review comments as they should be
* Better way to handle mail subjects
* insert unicode from tribute selection
* Add template helper for plain text when needed
* Use existing replace function I forgot about
* Don't include emoji greater than Unicode Version 12
Only include emoji and aliases in JSON
* Update build/generate-emoji.go
* Tweak regex slightly to really match everything including random invisible characters. Run tests for every emoji we have
* final updates
* code review
* code review
* hard code gitea custom emoji to match previous behavior
* Update .eslintrc
Co-Authored-By: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
* disable preempt
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Use AJAX for notifications table
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* move to separate js
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* placate golangci-lint
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add autoupdating notification count
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Fix wipeall
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* placate tests
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Try hidden
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Try hide and hidden
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* More auto-update improvements
Only run checker on pages that have a count
Change starting checker to 10s with a back-off to 60s if there is no change
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* string comparison!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* as per @silverwind
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* add configurability as per @6543
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add documentation as per @6543
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Use CSRF header not query
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Further JS improvements
Fix @etzelia update notification table request
Fix @silverwind comments
Co-Authored-By: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Simplify the notification count fns
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Some OAuth2 providers return quite large structured tokens >32767 bytes.
Gitea currently has a fixed maximum of 32767 bytes for these and
unfortunately due to the convoluted nature of the dependent libraries the
error returned is rather opaque.
Here we manage the error a little better - detecting the rather opaque
github.com/gorilla/securecookie.errEncodedValueTooLong and converting
it to a more readable error.
Further we provide a configurable option to increase the maximum size of
the provided OAuth2 tokens.
Fix #9907
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* use same process as in routers/repo/branch.go/deleteBranch
* make sure default branch can not be deleted
* remove IsDefaultBranch from UI process - it is worth its own pull
* permissions
* Add a way to mark Conversation (code comment) resolved
mark Conversation is a way to mark a Conversation is stale
or be solved. when it's marked as stale, will be hided like
stale. all Pull Request writer , Offical Reviewers and poster
can add or remove Conversation resolved mark.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* fix lint
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Add ResolveDoer
* fix ui
Co-Authored-By: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* change IsResolved to an function
Add permission check in UpdateResolveConversation
* Apply suggestions from code review
* change return error for permisson check
* add default message for deleted user
* get issue message from comment
* add migration for ``ResolveDoerID`` column
another change:
* block mark pending review as resolved because it's not necessary
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* change button color
* resolve button size
* fix code style
* remove unusefull code
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
It is possible for misconfigured protected branches to have required status checks that are not in any of the current statuses: Pending, Success, Error, Failure, or Warning - presumably because the CI has not contacted us as yet.
Fix #10636 by adding case: missing StatusChecks when these are missing
* Cache PullRequest Divergence
* only re-calc divergence if AddTestPullRequestTask() is exec
* migrate already open pulls
* finalize
* take care of closed¬-merged+deleted-branch pull requests
* fix nil pointer exeption
Signed-off-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* try this
* no error its a warn
* init gitea-repositories-meta
* dont use gitDivergence type
* CI.restart()
* CI.restart()
* CI.restart()
* CI.restart()
* check IsUserAllowedToUpdate independend from CommitsBehind
* make sure duplicate token names cannot be used
* add check to api routes too
* add @lunny s suggestion
* fix & don't forget User.ID
* AccessTokenByNameExists() return error too
* unique token for each test
* fix lint
Signed-off-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lanre Adelowo <yo@lanre.wtf>
Add api methods for getting and updating user oauth2 applications.
Signed-off-by: Dan Molik <dan@danmolik.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* [suggest] change merge strategy： do not check write access if user in merge white list #10935
(cherry picked from commit ba74fc6389dfcad03c273441a49b54e4d38c86ee)
* fix NPE
* Fix cross compile (#10952)
* Fix cross compile
* Add test for cross compile
* Fix drone
* Fix drone
* Also prevent CC environment not to generate
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* fix merge box icon color bug (#10974)
that because need some space beturn ``text`` and color defines
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
* Allow X in addition to x in tasks (#10979)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* remove api: merge reqRepoWriter
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: GiteaBot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* add request review feature in pull request
add a way to notify specific reviewers to review like github , by add or delet a special type
review . The acton is is similar to Assign , so many code reuse the function and items of
Assignee, but the meaning and result is different.
The Permission style is is similar to github, that only writer can add a review request from Reviewers,
but the poster can recall and remove a review request after a reviwer has revied even if he don't have
Write Premission. only manager , the poster and reviewer of a request review can remove it.
The reviewers can be requested to review contain all readers for private repo , for public, contain
all writers and watchers.
The offical Review Request will block merge if Reject can block it.
an other change: add ui otify for Assignees.
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* new change
* add placeholder string
* do some changes follow #10238 to add review requests num on lists also
change icon for review requests to eye
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
