### The CustomEvent prefix
There was already `ce-quick-submit`, the `ce-` prefix seems better than
`us-`. Rename the only `us-` prefixed `us-load-context-popup` to `ce-`
prefixed.
### Styles and Attributes in Go HTML Template
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21855#issuecomment-1429643073
Suggest to stick to `class="c1 {{if $var}}c2{{end}}"`
The readability and maintainability should be applied to the code which
is read by developers, but not for the generated outputs.
The template code is the code for developers, while the generated HTML
are only for browsers.
The `class="c1 {{if $var}}c2{{end}}"` style is clearer for developers
and more intuitive, and the generated HTML also makes browsers happy (a
few spaces do not affect anything)
Think about a more complex case:
* `class="{{if $active}}active{{end}} menu item {{if $show}}show{{end}}
{{if $warn}}warn{{end}}"`
* --vs--
* `class="{{if $active}}active {{end}}menu item{{if $show}}
show{{end}}{{if $warn}} warn{{end}}"`
The first style make it clearer to see each CSS class name with its
`{{if}}` block.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
If an event listener must be `async`, the `e.preventDefault()` should be
before any `await`,
it's recommended to put it at the beginning of the function.
Close #22847
This PR:
* introduce Gitea's own `showElem` and related functions
* remove jQuery show/hide
* remove .hide class
* remove inline style=display:none
From now on:
do not use:
* "[hidden]" attribute: it's too weak, can not be applied to an element
with "display: flex"
* ".hidden" class: it has been polluted by Fomantic UI in many cases
* inline style="display: none": it's difficult to tweak
* jQuery's show/hide/toggle: it can not show/hide elements with
"display: xxx !important"
only use:
* this ".gt-hidden" class
* showElem/hideElem/toggleElem functions in "utils/dom.js"
cc: @silverwind , this is the all-in-one PR
This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the
design of GitHub OAuth scopes.
The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken`
struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of
scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token`
table in the database.
In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be
used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have
granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope
`all`.
A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the
corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes
to each of the API calls as they fit.
- [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken`
- [x] Add access control to all API endpoints
- [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens
- [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access
to past tokens)
I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release.
Fixes #4300
This patch:
- Rename some files( `.md` to `.en-us.md`), fix missed translation copy
- Update link which shoud be refer to `../hacking-on-gitea/` instead of
`../make/` (outdated)
- Update `_redirects`:
- redirect `/{zh-cn|fr-fr}/make/` to `../hacking-on-gitea/`
- redirect `/zh-cn/third-party-tools/` to `/zh-cn/integrations/`
- Delete duplicated/outdated files.
- Update menu `weight` of developers.zh-cn.md
Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.
> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
> maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
> confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
> **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4
> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.
Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1
> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message
Fixes #21299
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Add documentation about pagination of the API
* Update docs/content/doc/developers/api-usage.en-us.md
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* Update the webauthn_credential_id_sequence in Postgres
There is (yet) another problem with v210 in that Postgres will silently allow preset
ID insertions ... but it will not update the sequence value.
This PR simply adds a little step to the end of the v210 migration to update the
sequence number.
Users who have already migrated who find that they cannot insert new
webauthn_credentials into the DB can either run:
```bash
gitea doctor recreate-table webauthn_credential
```
or
```bash
./gitea doctor --run=check-db-consistency --fix
```
which will fix the bad sequence.
Fix #19012
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
The service worker causes a lot of issues with JS errors after instance
upgrades while not bringing any real performance gain over regular HTTP
caching.
Disable it by default for this reason. Maybe later we can remove it
completely, as I simply see no benefit in having it.
In the case of misuse or misunderstanding from a developer whereby,
if `sel` can receive user-controlled data, jQuery `$(sel)` can lead to the
creation of a new element. Current usage is using hard-coded selectors
in the templates, but nobody prevents that from expanding to
user-controlled somehow.
The GITEA_UNIT_TESTS_VERBOSE variable is an undocumented variable
introduced in 2017 (see 1028ef2def)
whose sole purpose has been to log SQL statements when running unit
tests.
It is renamed for clarity and a warning is displayed for backward
compatibility for people and scripts that know about it.
The documentation is updated to reflect this change.
services: provide some services for users, usually use
database (models) modules: provide some basic functions without
database, eg: code parser, etc The major difference is services use
database, while modules don’t.
Signed-off-by: singuliere <singuliere@autistici.org>
* Add documentation for backend development
* Update backend guidline
* More sections
* Add modules/setting and modules/git
* Uniform gitea as Gitea
* some improvements
* some improvements
* the project board was broken, this PR fixes it, and refactor the code, and we prevent the uncategorized column from being dragged.
* improve the frontend guideline (as discussed in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17699)
