* Make auto check manual merge as a chooseable mod and add manual merge way on ui
as title, Before this pr, we use same way with GH to check manually merge.
It good, but in some special cases, misjudgments can occur. and it's hard
to fix this bug. So I add option to allow repo manager block "auto check manual merge"
function, Then it will have same style like gitlab(allow empty pr). and to compensate for
not being able to detect THE PR merge automatically, I added a manual approach.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* make swager
* api support
* ping ci
* fix TestPullCreate_EmptyChangesWithCommits
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* Apply review suggestions and add test
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* fix build
* test error message
* make fmt
* Fix indentation issues identified by @silverwind
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
* Fix tests and make manually merged disabled error on API the same
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* a small nit
* fix wrong commit id error
* fix bug
* simple test
* fix test
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* make repo as "pending transfer" if on transfer start doer has no right to create repo in new destination
* if new pending transfer ocured, create UI & Mail notifications
Support create single tag directly
support create tag with message from create release ui
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* CutDiffAroundLine makes the incorrect assumption that `---` and `+++` always represent part of the header of a diff.
This PR adds a flag to its parsing to prevent this problem and adds a streaming parsing technique to CutDiffAroundLine using an io.pipe instead of just sending data to an unbounded buffer.
Fix #14711
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Handle unquoted comment patch files
When making comment patches unfortunately the patch does not always quote the filename
This makes the diff --git header ambiguous again.
This PR finally adds handling for ambiguity in to parse patch
Fix #14812
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add in testing for no error
There is no way currently for CutDiffAroundLine in this test to cause an
error however, it should still be tested.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Gitea runs diff on highlighted code fragment for each line in order to provide
code highlight diffs. Unfortunately this diff algorithm is not aware that span tags
and entities are atomic and cannot be split.
The current fixup code makes some attempt to fix these broken tags however, it cannot
handle situations where a tag is split over multiple blocks.
This PR provides a more algorithmic fixup mechanism whereby spans and entities are
completely coalesced into their respective blocks.
This may result in a incompletely reduced diff but - it will definitely prevent the
broken entities and spans that are currently possible.
As a result of this fixup several inconsistencies were discovered in our testcases
and these were also fixed.
Fix #14231
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Added option to disable web hooks
This mod introduces DISABLE_WEB_HOOKS parameter in [security] section
of app.ini (by default set to false). If set to true it disables web
hooks feature. Any existing undelivered web hook tasks will be cancelled.
Any existing web hook definitions will be left untouched in db but
its delivery tasks will be ignored.
Author-Change-Id: IB#1105130
* Webhook spelling fixed
Webhook spelling fixed.
Fixes: 07df6614dc
Related: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/13176#pullrequestreview-510868421
Author-Change-Id: IB#1105174
* Parameter description fixed
Parameter description fixed.
Fixes: 07df6614dc
Related: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/13176#pullrequestreview-514086107
Author-Change-Id: IB#1105174
* refactor models.DeleteComment and delete related reactions too
* use deleteComment for UserDeleteWithCommentsMaxDays in DeleteUser
* nits
* Use time.Duration as other time settings have
* docs
* Resolve Fixme & fix potential deadlock
* Disabled by Default
* Update Config Value Description
* switch args
* Update models/issue_comment.go
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* Fix wrong type on hooktask to convert typ from char(16) to varchar(16)
* Fix bugs
* Improve code
* Use different trim function for MSSQL
* Fix bug
* Removed wrong changed line
* Removed wrong changed line
* Fix nullable
* Fix lint
* Ignore sqlite on migration
* Fix mssql modify column failure
* Move modifyColumn to migrations.go so that other migrate function could use it
Fixes #14187: mention handling extracted from email notification code
Fixes #14013: add notification for mentions in pull request code comments
Fixes #13450: Not receiving any emails with setting "Only Email on Mention"
* remove github.com/unknwon/com from models
* dont use "com.ToStr()"
* replace "com.ToStr" with "fmt.Sprint" where its easy to do
* more refactor
* fix test
* just "proxy" Copy func for now
* as per @lunny
Originally, it was filled by the commit messages of the involved
commits. In this change, we use the headline comment of the pull
request as the commit message when it is a squash merge.
Thanks to @zeripath for suggesting the idea.
Fixes #12365
Co-authored-by: Mura Li <typeless@users.noreply.github.com>
* Show dropdown with all statuses for commit
* Use popups
* Remove unnecessary change
* Style popup
* Use divided list
* As per @silverwind
* Refactor GetLastCommitStatus
* Missing dropdown on repo home and commit page
* Fix tests
* Make status icon be a part of a link on PR list
* Fix missing translation call
* Indent fix
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Show status check for merged PRs
* Handle PRs with no commits
* Styling
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Fixes #13683.
The diff snippet that provides context for a code review comment on the pull request timeline page used to be calculated based on the headCommitID. But in 1.13, with PR #13448, this changed to the commitID from the blame for the commented line, which seems to cause these incorrect review comment diff snippets.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
The default branch in wikis must be master - therefore forcibly set the HEAD
to master.
Fix #13846
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
PR #13381 refactored notification actions to call NotifyCreateRef and
NotifyDeleteRef in a slightly different manner. This leads to the pusher
not being set before the call.
This PR ensures that the pusher is updated before the call.
Fix #13940
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
fix dst refspec error in 'Push back to upstream' when base branch have
same name with a tag.
fix #13851
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* Handle incomplete diff files properly
The code for parsing diff hunks has a bug whereby a very long line
in a very long diff would not be completely read leading to an unexpected
character.
This PR ensures that the line is completely cleared
Fix #13602
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Also allow git max line length <4096
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add test case
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* When replying to an outdated comment it should not appear on the files page
This happened because the comment took the latest commitID as its base instead of the
reviewID that it was replying to.
There was also no way of creating an already outdated comment - and a
reply to a review on an outdated line should be outdated.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fix test
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Fix broken migration
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fix mssql
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Create temporary table because ... well MSSQL ...
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Create temporary table because ... well MSSQL ...
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Create temporary table because ... well MSSQL ...
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fix mssql
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* move session within the batch
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* regen the sqlcmd each time round the loop
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* as per @lunny
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Make archival asynchronous
The prime benefit being sought here is for large archives to not
clog up the rendering process and cause unsightly proxy timeouts.
As a secondary benefit, archive-in-progress is moved out of the
way into a /tmp file so that new archival requests for the same
commit will not get fulfilled based on an archive that isn't yet
finished.
This asynchronous system is fairly primitive; request comes in, we'll
spawn off a new goroutine to handle it, then we'll mark it as done.
Status requests will see if the file exists in the final location,
and report the archival as done when it exists.
Fixes #11265
* Archive links: drop initial delay to three-quarters of a second
Some, or perhaps even most, archives will not take all that long to archive.
The archive process starts as soon as the download button is initially
clicked, so in theory they could be done quite quickly. Drop the initial
delay down to three-quarters of a second to make it more responsive in the
common case of the archive being quickly created.
* archiver: restructure a little bit to facilitate testing
This introduces two sync.Cond pointers to the archiver package. If they're
non-nil when we go to process a request, we'll wait until signalled (at all)
to proceed. The tests will then create the sync.Cond so that it can signal
at-will and sanity-check the state of the queue at different phases.
The author believes that nil-checking these two sync.Cond pointers on every
archive processing will introduce minimal overhead with no impact on
maintainability.
* gofmt nit: no space around binary + operator
* services: archiver: appease golangci-lint, lock queueMutex
Locking/unlocking the queueMutex is allowed, but not required, for
Cond.Signal() and Cond.Broadcast(). The magic at play here is just a little
too much for golangci-lint, as we take the address of queueMutex and this is
mostly used in archiver.go; the variable still gets flagged as unused.
* archiver: tests: fix several timing nits
Once we've signaled a cond var, it may take some small amount of time for
the goroutines released to hit the spot we're wanting them to be at. Give
them an appropriate amount of time.
* archiver: tests: no underscore in var name, ungh
* archiver: tests: Test* is run in a separate context than TestMain
We must setup the mutex/cond variables at the beginning of any test that's
going to use it, or else these will be nil when the test is actually ran.
* archiver: tests: hopefully final tweak
Things got shuffled around such that we carefully build up and release
requests from the queue, so we can validate the state of the queue at each
step. Fix some assertions that no longer hold true as fallout.
* repo: Download: restore some semblance of previous behavior
When archival was made async, the GET endpoint was only useful if a previous
POST had initiated the download. This commit restores the previous behavior,
to an extent; we'll now submit the archive request there and return a
"202 Accepted" to indicate that it's processing if we didn't manage to
complete the request within ~2 seconds of submission.
This lets a client directly GET the archive, and gives them some indication
that they may attempt to GET it again at a later time.
* archiver: tests: simplify a bit further
We don't need to risk failure and use time.ParseDuration to get 2 *
time.Second.
else if isn't really necessary if the conditions are simple enough and lead
to the same result.
* archiver: tests: resolve potential source of flakiness
Increase all timeouts to 10 seconds; these aren't hard-coded sleeps, so
there's no guarantee we'll actually take that long. If we need longer to
not have a false-positive, then so be it.
While here, various assert.{Not,}Equal arguments are flipped around so that
the wording in error output reflects reality, where the expected argument is
second and actual third.
* archiver: setup infrastructure for notifying consumers of completion
This API will *not* allow consumers to subscribe to specific requests being
completed, just *any* request being completed. The caller is responsible for
determining if their request is satisfied and waiting again if needed.
* repo: archive: make GET endpoint synchronous again
If the request isn't complete, this endpoint will now submit the request and
wait for completion using the new API. This may still be susceptible to
timeouts for larger repos, but other endpoints now exist that the web
interface will use to negotiate its way through larger archive processes.
* archiver: tests: amend test to include WaitForCompletion()
This is a trivial one, so go ahead and include it.
* archiver: tests: fix test by calling NewContext()
The mutex is otherwise uninitialized, so we need to ensure that we're
actually initializing it if we plan to test it.
* archiver: tests: integrate new WaitForCompletion a little better
We can use this to wait for archives to come in, rather than spinning and
hoping with a timeout.
* archiver: tests: combine numQueued declaration with next-instruction assignment
* routers: repo: reap unused archiving flag from DownloadStatus()
This had some planned usage before, indicating whether this request
initiated the archival process or not. After several rounds of refactoring,
this use was deemed not necessary for much of anything and got boiled down
to !complete in all cases.
* services: archiver: restructure to use a channel
We now offer two forms of waiting for a request:
- WaitForCompletion: wait for completion with no timeout
- TimedWaitForCompletion: wait for completion with timeout
In both cases, we wait for the given request's cchan to close; in the latter
case, we do so with the caller-provided timeout. This completely removes the
need for busy-wait loops in Download/InitiateDownload, as it's fairly clean
to wait on a channel with timeout.
* services: archiver: use defer to unlock now that we can
This previously carried the lock into the goroutine, but an intermediate
step just added the request to archiveInProgress outside of the new
goroutine and removed the need for the goroutine to start out with it.
* Revert "archiver: tests: combine numQueued declaration with next-instruction assignment"
This reverts commit bcc5214023.
Revert "archiver: tests: integrate new WaitForCompletion a little better"
This reverts commit 9fc8bedb56.
Revert "archiver: tests: fix test by calling NewContext()"
This reverts commit 709c35685e.
Revert "archiver: tests: amend test to include WaitForCompletion()"
This reverts commit 75261f56bc.
* archiver: tests: first attempt at WaitForCompletion() tests
* archiver: tests: slight improvement, less busy-loop
Just wait for the requests to complete in order, instead of busy-waiting
with a timeout. This is slightly less fragile.
While here, reverse the arguments of a nearby assert.Equal() so that
expected/actual are correct in any test output.
* archiver: address lint nits
* services: archiver: only close the channel once
* services: archiver: use a struct{} for the wait channel
This makes it obvious that the channel is only being used as a signal,
rather than anything useful being piped through it.
* archiver: tests: fix expectations
Move the close of the channel into doArchive() itself; notably, before these
goroutines move on to waiting on the Release cond.
The tests are adjusted to reflect that we can't WaitForCompletion() after
they've already completed, as WaitForCompletion() doesn't indicate that
they've been released from the queue yet.
* archiver: tests: set cchan to nil for comparison
* archiver: move ctx.Error's back into the route handlers
We shouldn't be setting this in a service, we should just be validating the
request that we were handed.
* services: archiver: use regex to match a hash
This makes sure we don't try and use refName as a hash when it's clearly not
one, e.g. heads/pull/foo.
* routers: repo: remove the weird /archive/status endpoint
We don't need to do this anymore, we can just continue POSTing to the
archive/* endpoint until we're told the download's complete. This avoids a
potential naming conflict, where a ref could start with "status/"
* archiver: tests: bump reasonable timeout to 15s
* archiver: tests: actually release timedReq
* archiver: tests: run through inFlight instead of manually checking
While we're here, add a test for manually re-processing an archive that's
already been complete. Re-open the channel and mark it incomplete, so that
doArchive can just mark it complete again.
* initArchiveLinks: prevent default behavior from clicking
* archiver: alias gitea's context, golang context import pending
* archiver: simplify logic, just reconstruct slices
While the previous logic was perhaps slightly more efficient, the
new variant's readability is much improved.
* archiver: don't block shutdown on waiting for archive
The technique established launches a goroutine to do the wait,
which will close a wait channel upon termination. For the timeout
case, we also send back a value indicating whether the timeout was
hit or not.
The timeouts are expected to be relatively small, but still a multi-
second delay to shutdown due to this could be unfortunate.
* archiver: simplify shutdown logic
We can just grab the shutdown channel from the graceful manager instead of
constructing a channel to halt the caller and/or pass a result back.
* Style issues
* Fix mis-merge
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
