A regression of #25210
The `e.target` is not "this", eg: `<button link-action><svg></button>`,
then `this` should be `button` but `e.target` is `svg`.
I will propose a clearer and complete solution for these "link-action"
"show-modal" elements after #24724
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- Update all JS dependencies
- Enable stylint
[`media-feature-name-value-no-unknown`](https://stylelint.io/user-guide/rules/media-feature-name-value-no-unknown)
- Make use of new features in webpack and text-expander-element
- Tested Swagger and Mermaid
To explain the `text-expander-element` change: Before this version, the
element added a unavoidable space after emoji completion. Now that
https://github.com/github/text-expander-element/pull/36 is in, we gain
control over this space and I opted to remove it for emoji completion
and retain it for `@` mentions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Clarify the "link-action" behavior:
> // A "link-action" can post AJAX request to its "data-url"
> // Then the browser is redirect to: the "redirect" in response, or
"data-redirect" attribute, or current URL by reloading.
And enhance the "link-action" to support showing a modal dialog for
confirm. A similar general approach could also help PRs like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22344#discussion_r1062883436
> // If the "link-action" has "data-modal-confirm(-html)" attribute, a
confirm modal dialog will be shown before taking action.
And a lot of duplicate code can be removed now. A good framework design
can help to avoid code copying&pasting.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
The current UI to create API access tokens uses checkboxes that have a
complicated relationship where some need to be checked and/or disabled
in certain states. It also requires that a user interact with it to
understand what their options really are.
This branch changes to use `<select>`s. It better fits the available
options, and it's closer to [GitHub's
UI](https://github.com/settings/personal-access-tokens/new), which is
good, in my opinion. It's more mobile friendly since the tap-areas are
larger. If we ever add more permissions, like Maintainer, there's a
natural place that doesn't take up more screen real-estate.
This branch also fixes a few minor issues:
- Hide the error about selecting at least one permission after second
submission
- Fix help description to call it "authorization" since that's what
permissions are about (not authentication)
Related: #24767.
<img width="883" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-07 at 5 07 34 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/10803/6b63d807-c9be-4a4b-8e53-ecab6cbb8f76">
---
When it's open:
<img width="881" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-07 at 5 07 59 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/10803/2432c6d0-39c2-4ca4-820e-c878ffdbfb69">
Fixes #25160.
`data-source-position` of checkboxes in a task list was incorrect
whenever there was YAML front matter. This would result in issue content
or PR descriptions getting corrupted with random `x` or space characters
when a user checked or unchecked a task.
According to my test, the UI (emoji) is fine in Safari
And actually the code is just dead code, because the "resize" event is
never fired on page loading. So for most cases users just view the pages
without this hacky patch, nobody ever complains.
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25130
The old code uses `$(this).next()` to get `dismiss-review-modal`.
At first, it will get `$(#dismiss-review-modal)`, but the next time it
will get `$(#dismiss-review-modal).next();`
and then `$(#dismiss-review-modal).next().next();`.
Because div `dismiss-review-modal` will be removed when
`dismiss-review-btn` clicked.
Maybe the right usage is adding `show-modal` class and `data-modal`
attribute.
Follow:
* #22697
There are some bugs in #22697:
* https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22697#issuecomment-1577957966
* the webauthn failure message is never shown and causes console error
* The `document.getElementById('register-button')` and
`document.getElementById('login-button')` is wrong
* there is no such element in code
* it causes JS error when a browser doesn't provide webauthn
* the end user can't see the real error message
These bugs are fixed in this PR.
Other changes:
* Use simple HTML/CSS layouts, no need to use too many `gt-` patches
* Make the webauthn page have correct "page-content" layout
* The "data-webauthn-error-msg" elements are only used to provide locale
texts, so move them into a single "gt-hidden", then no need to repeat a
lot of "gt-hidden" in code
* The `{{.CsrfTokenHtml}}` is a no-op because there is no form
* Many `hideElem('#webauthn-error')` in code is no-op because the
`webauthn-error` already has "gt-hidden" by default
* Make the tests for "URLEncodedBase64" really test with concrete cases.
Screenshots:
* Error message when webauthn fails (before, there is no error message):
<details>
</details>
* Error message when webauthn is unavailable
<details>
</details>
There were several issues with the WebAuthn registration and testing
code and the style
was very old javascript with jquery callbacks.
This PR uses async and fetch to replace the JQuery code.
Ref #22651
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Feel free to close this if there isn't interest.
The tree view looks amazing, and all of our users are really enjoying it
(major kudos to developers!), but only IF I tell them it exists!
Essentially, the file tree view as it is effectively undiscoverable.
This PR changes the default state for the tree view to open, which
should significantly help with discoverability.
An alternative could be to reserve more horizontal space, as a typical
accordion panel would look (eg. VS Code), eg.
It's been disabled by default since 1.17
(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18914), and it never really
delivered any benefit except being another cache layer that has its own
unsolved invalidation issues. HTTP cache works, we don't need two cache
layers at the browser for assets.
## ⚠️ BREAKING
You can remove the config `[ui].USE_SERVICE_WORKER` from your `app.ini`
now.
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.
## Screenshots
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- Replace `<table>` with flexbox
- Add issue modification time and issue number
- Remove big title
- Replace tabs with menu items
- Add clicked item deletion on back button cache restoration
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
There was some recent discussion about this in Discord `ui-design`
channel and the conclusion was that
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24305 should have fixed their
OS font installation to have semibold weights.
I have now tested this 601 weight on a Windows 10 machine on Firefox
myself, and I immediately noticed that bold was excessivly bold and
rendering as 700 because browsers are biased towards bolder fonts. So
revert this back to the previous value.
Visually, nothing should have changed.
Changes include
- Convert most `<a [no href]>` to `<button>` when (re-)viewing files:
- `<a [no href]>` are, by HTML definition, not a link and hence cannot
be focused
- `<a class="ui button">` can now be clicked (again?) using
<kbd>Enter</kbd>
- Previously, the installed keypress handler on `.ui.button` elements
disabled it for links somehow
- The `(un)escape file`, the `expand section` and the `expand/collapse
file` buttons can now be focused (and subsequently clicked using only
the keyboard)
- You can now press <kbd>Space</kbd> on a focused `View file` checkbox
to mark the file as viewed.
- previously, this was impossible as this checkbox listened on the wrong
event listener
The `add code comment` button has been left inaccessible for now as it
requires quite a bit of extra logic so that it is unhidden when it is
focused (you can otherwise focus it without seeing it as you are not
hovering on the corresponding line).
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
This PR is to allow users to specify status checks by patterns. Users
can enter patterns in the "Status Check Pattern" `textarea` to match
status checks and each line specifies a pattern. If "Status Check" is
enabled, patterns cannot be empty and user must enter at least one
pattern.
Users will no longer be able to choose status checks from the table. But
a __*`Matched`*__ mark will be added to the matched checks to help users
enter patterns.
Benefits:
- Even if no status checks have been completed, users can specify
necessary status checks in advance.
- More flexible. Users can specify a series of status checks by one
pattern.
Before:
After:
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Fix regression from https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23801, where
I forgot that the new module will not throw, so the `catch` handlers
were never triggered and in turn, the WEBP was not converted to PNG.
