1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-12-15 11:58:11 -05:00
Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
TheFox0x7
4de909747b Add testifylint to lint checks (#4535)
go-require lint is ignored for now

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4535
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
2024-07-30 19:41:10 +00:00
Yaroslav Halchenko
2b2fd2728c Add codespell support and fix a good number of typos with its help (#3270)
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .

I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.

```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
	@echo " - lint-spell                       lint spelling"
	@echo " - lint-spell-fix                   lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml:      - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml:      - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
2024-05-09 13:49:37 +00:00
6543
9ea9b850da
Meilisearch double quote on "match" query (#29740)
make `nonFuzzyWorkaround` unessesary

cc @Kerollmops

(cherry picked from commit c6e5ec51bd5d2d3ede30b7506e7cc47f18a49ca8)
2024-03-20 08:46:30 +01:00
6543
38c3cc4eb7
Patch in exact search for meilisearch (#29671)
meilisearch does not have an search option to contorl fuzzynes per query
right now:
 - https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/issues/1192
 - https://github.com/orgs/meilisearch/discussions/377
 - https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/discussions/1096

so we have to create a workaround by post-filter the search result in
gitea until this is addressed.

For future works I added an option in backend only atm, to enable
fuzzynes for issue indexer too.
And also refactored the code so the fuzzy option is equal in logic to
code indexer

---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
Conflicts:
	routers/web/repo/search.go
	trivial context confict s/isMatch/isFuzzy/
2024-03-11 23:37:00 +07:00
Earl Warren
c480d7fe6d
[CI] disable meilisearch/elasticsearch test, no server yet in CI
(cherry picked from commit a1381d9146fba42cb97d72d38525fa3e721bfb03)
(cherry picked from commit 74714e0246)
(cherry picked from commit 7749dbfe66)
(cherry picked from commit 4379249711)
(cherry picked from commit a69f55bebf)
(cherry picked from commit 24dd5fbfdb)
(cherry picked from commit dda856d6b8)
(cherry picked from commit bc14f4fa97)
(cherry picked from commit 78fef4f137)
(cherry picked from commit 69e013cc51)
(cherry picked from commit f173c6a273)
(cherry picked from commit 92f9d02547)
(cherry picked from commit c99d51e665)
(cherry picked from commit aa0650fd2b)
(cherry picked from commit 0a8ef91302)
(cherry picked from commit 7b54fe01c2)
(cherry picked from commit 0e154f366f)
(cherry picked from commit 02d88ee16d)
(cherry picked from commit 411924e017)
(cherry picked from commit f4e9ca6db5)
(cherry picked from commit cd80126a23)
(cherry picked from commit da626702f9)
(cherry picked from commit 4b81d0bd04)
(cherry picked from commit 53ac260669)
(cherry picked from commit 984081f08d)
(cherry picked from commit 1c39bae3ec)
2024-02-05 13:33:58 +01:00
Jason Song
1e76a824bc
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012)
Fix #24662.

Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged)


## Background

In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and
conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues
with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all)
on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with
conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is
why the results could be incomplete.

To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as
conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional
conditions when searching with the indexer.

## Major changes

- Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as
filter conditions.
- Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64,
limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options
*SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now.
- Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use
`IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been
updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of
the queue.
- Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them
fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions.
- Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove
`issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is
the entry point to search issues.
- Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests.
- Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test
Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 06:28:53 +00:00