Uses `gopls check <files>` as a linter. Tested locally and brings up 149
errors currently for me. I don't think I want to fix them in this PR,
but I would like at least to get this analysis running on CI.
List of errors:
```
modules/indexer/code/indexer.go:181:11: impossible condition: nil != nil
routers/private/hook_post_receive.go:120:15: tautological condition: nil == nil
services/auth/source/oauth2/providers.go:185:9: tautological condition: nil == nil
services/convert/issue.go:216:11: tautological condition: non-nil != nil
tests/integration/git_test.go:332:9: impossible condition: nil != nil
services/migrations/migrate.go:179:24-43: unused parameter: ctx
services/repository/transfer.go:288:48-69: unused parameter: doer
tests/integration/api_repo_tags_test.go:75:41-61: unused parameter: session
tests/integration/git_test.go:696:64-74: unused parameter: baseBranch
tests/integration/gpg_git_test.go:265:27-39: unused parameter: t
tests/integration/gpg_git_test.go:284:23-29: unused parameter: tmpDir
tests/integration/gpg_git_test.go:284:31-35: unused parameter: name
tests/integration/gpg_git_test.go:284:37-42: unused parameter: email
```
(cherry picked from commit 816222243af523316041692622be6f48ef068693)
Conflicts:
Makefile
trivial context conflict and also ask renovate to watch over it
do not include it in lint-backend because the errors are not fixed
When performing migrations, and need to remap external users to local
ones, when no local mapping is possible, map the external user to Ghost,
rather than the user who initiated the migration.
Mapping the external user to the migration initiator has the potential
of breaking assumptions elsewhere, like only having one review per pull
request per user. Mapping these migrated, locally unavailable users to
Ghost makes sure these - often hidden - assumptions do not break.
Fixes #3860.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
When creating a repo, the "FORCE_PRIVATE" config option should be
respected, `readonly` doesn't work for checkbox, so it should use
`disabled` attribute.
(cherry picked from commit edbf74c418061b013a5855f604dd6be6baf34132)
Conflicts:
templates/repo/create.tmpl
templates/repo/migrate/codebase.tmpl
templates/repo/migrate/git.tmpl
templates/repo/migrate/gitbucket.tmpl
templates/repo/migrate/gitea.tmpl
templates/repo/migrate/github.tmpl
templates/repo/migrate/gitlab.tmpl
templates/repo/migrate/gogs.tmpl
templates/repo/migrate/onedev.tmpl
already in forgejo fc0c5e80da Fix and improve repo visibility checkbox when FORCE_PRIVATE is on (#3786)
enforcing FORCE_PRIVATE on repo settings was manually tested
with a repository of an unprivileged user after setting
FORCE_PRIVATE = true
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .
I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.
```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
@echo " - lint-spell lint spelling"
@echo " - lint-spell-fix lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Resolve all cases for `unused parameter` and `unnecessary type
arguments`
Related: #30729
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit e80466f7349164ce4cf3c07bdac30d736d20f035)
Conflicts:
modules/markup/markdown/transform_codespan.go
modules/setting/incoming_email.go
routers/api/v1/admin/user_badge.go
routers/private/hook_pre_receive.go
tests/integration/repo_search_test.go
resolved by discarding the change, this is linting only and
for the sake of avoiding future conflicts
Also add a test for GogsDownloaderFactory.New() to make sure
that the URL of the source repository is parsed correctly.
When the source gogs instance is hosted at a subpath like `https://git.example.com/gogs/<username>/<reponame>` the migration fails.
This PR fixes that.
Co-authored-by: hecker <tomas.hecker@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3572
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: varp0n <tom@gkstn.de>
Co-committed-by: varp0n <tom@gkstn.de>
Noteable additions:
- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches
Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
(cherry picked from commit 74f0c84fa4245a20ce6fb87dac1faf2aeeded2a2)
Conflicts:
.golangci.yml
apply the linter recommendations to Forgejo code as well
This patch improves the migration from gitbucket to gitea.
The gitbucket uses it's own internal perPage value (= 25) for paging and
ignore per_page arguments in the requested URL. This cause gitea to
migrate only 25 issues and 25 PRs from gitbucket repository. This may
not happens on old gitbucket. But recent gitbucket 4.40 or 4.38.4 has
this problem.
This patch change to use this internally hardcoded perPage of gitbucket
as gitea's maxPerPage numer when migrating from gitbucket. There are
several perPage values in gitbucket like 25 for Isseus/PRs and 10 for
Releases. Some of those API doesn't support paging yet. It sounds
difficult to implement, but using the minimum number among them worked
out very well. So, I use 10 in this patch.
Brief descriptions of problems and this patch are also available in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30316.
In addition, I'm not sure what kind of test cases are possible to write
here. It's a test for migration, so it requires testing gitbucket server
and gitea server, I guess. Please let me know if it is possible to write
such test cases here. Thanks!
(cherry picked from commit 7af074dbeebc3c863618992b43f84ec9e5ab9657)
See also: [GITEA] Enable mocked HTTP responses for GitLab migration test
make GITLAB_READ_TOKEN=XXXX GO_TEST_PACKAGES='code.gitea.io/gitea/services/migrations/... -test.v' FLAGS= 'test#TestGitlabDownloadRepo'
to update the captured GitLab HTTP requests used for offline testing.
Some specific events on Gitlab issues and merge requests are stored
separately from comments as "resource state events". With this change,
all relevant resource state events are downloaded during issue and merge
request migration, and converted to comments.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these types.
ref: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/resource_state_events.html
(cherry picked from commit 17f170ee3724d8bdf2ddaad4211b12433f78ff0e)
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for a new specific kind of event: Changing the
target branch of a PR. When detected, it is downloaded using Gitea's
type for this event, and eventually uploaded into Gitea in the expected
format, i.e. with no text content in the comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of this type.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L102)
(cherry picked from commit 6e5966597c2d498d1a8540dad965461d44ff8e57)
Now we can get object format name from git command line or from the
database repository table. Assume the column is right, we don't need to
read from git command line every time.
This also fixed a possible bug that the object format is wrong when
migrating a sha256 repository from external.
<img width="658" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/6e9a9dcf-13bf-4267-928b-6bf2c2560423">
(cherry picked from commit b79c30435f439af8243ee281310258cdf141e27b)
Conflicts:
routers/web/repo/blame.go
services/agit/agit.go
context
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for two specific kinds of events: Scheduling and
un-scheduling of automatic merges on a PR. When detected, they are
downloaded using Gitea's type for these events, and eventually uploaded
into Gitea in the expected format, i.e. with no text content in the
comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these two types.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L6-L17)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a70c00b80bcb5de8479e407f1b8f08dcf756019d)
So the caller can check log events at the desired level instead of
being limited to the default level log.INFO
(cherry picked from commit 2fbf5f9555)
(cherry picked from commit e2137a3147)
Fix gitlab migration unit test
Closes #1837.
The differences in dates can be explained by commit e19b9653ea, which
changed the order in which "created_date" and "updated_date" are
considered.
(cherry picked from commit b0bba20aa4)
Mock HTTP requests in GitLab migration test
This introduces a new utility which can be added to other tests
making HTTP calls to a live service, to cache the responses of this
service in the repository.
(cherry picked from commit 52053b1389)
Enable mocked HTTP responses for GitLab migration test
(cherry picked from commit 19cefc4de2)
Simplify HTTP mocking utility in unit tests
Follow-up to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1841
(cherry picked from commit ca517c8bb4)
(cherry picked from commit b227e0dd6b)
(cherry picked from commit 6cc9d06556)
(cherry picked from commit f0746e648d)
(cherry picked from commit 414193341b)
(cherry picked from commit 6e93df3bbb)
(cherry picked from commit db0dbab552)
(cherry picked from commit 8f9c9c63fb)
(cherry picked from commit e74e262030)
(cherry picked from commit 2e0933edcf)
(cherry picked from commit 65060c6961)
- If there's a code comment that's received during the migration that
contains no diffhunk, skip it. This either means it was commenting on
old diffhunk or it's just a general codecomment. Forgejo supports
neither of such type of code comment.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1407
(cherry picked from commit ae463c7c55)
(cherry picked from commit bf48f02a86)
(cherry picked from commit 10c3f102fa)
(cherry picked from commit 828b4cc10c)
(cherry picked from commit 6427fa65b6)
(cherry picked from commit 5b7a43c43f)
(cherry picked from commit 4eef0fce72)
(cherry picked from commit a46192a4a6)
(cherry picked from commit 107a9b8233)
(cherry picked from commit 308251fc48)
(cherry picked from commit 017c4a53c5)
(cherry picked from commit 4534a3393b)
(cherry picked from commit 74e0c1663d)
(cherry picked from commit 9b17353f85)
(cherry picked from commit 09b6f58304)
(cherry picked from commit bc649733a1)
(cherry picked from commit f1d4c783e2)
(cherry picked from commit d6850bc308)
(cherry picked from commit 21230d2d24)
(cherry picked from commit 569b278382)
[FEAT] add Forgejo Git Service (squash) register a Forgejo factory
If the Forgejo factory for the Forgejo service is not registered,
newDownloader will fallback to a git service and not migrate issues
etc.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1678
(cherry picked from commit 51938cd161)
[FEAT] add Forgero Git Service
Signed-off-by: cassiozareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a878adfe62)
Adding description and Forgejo SVG
(cherry picked from commit 13738c0380)
Undo reordering and tmpl redirection
(cherry picked from commit 9ae51c46f4)
(cherry picked from commit 70fffdc61d)
(cherry picked from commit c0ebfa9da3)
(cherry picked from commit 9922c92787)
(cherry picked from commit 00c0effbc7)
(cherry picked from commit e4c9525b13)
(cherry picked from commit 09d7b83211)
(cherry picked from commit bbcd5975c9)
(cherry picked from commit 55c70a0e18)
(cherry picked from commit 76596410c0)
(cherry picked from commit 1308043931)
(cherry picked from commit 919d6aedfe)
[FEAT] add Forgero Git Service (squash) more tests
Previously only Gitea service was being tested under self-hosted migrations. Since Forgejo is also self-hosted and in fact use the same downloader/migrator we can add to this suite another test that will do the same, migrating the same repository under the same local instance but for the Forgejo service (represented by 9)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1709
Co-authored-by: zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 40a4b8f1a8)
(cherry picked from commit 3198b4a642)
(cherry picked from commit 4edda1f389)
(cherry picked from commit 4d91b77d29)
(cherry picked from commit afe85c52e3)
(cherry picked from commit 5ea7df79ad)
(cherry picked from commit a667182542)
(cherry picked from commit a9bebb1e71)
(cherry picked from commit 4831a89e46)
(cherry picked from commit e02a74651f)
(cherry picked from commit 05dcef59aa)
(cherry picked from commit c8bac187f9)
(cherry picked from commit c87903a0cc)
## Purpose
This is a refactor toward building an abstraction over managing git
repositories.
Afterwards, it does not matter anymore if they are stored on the local
disk or somewhere remote.
## What this PR changes
We used `git.OpenRepository` everywhere previously.
Now, we should split them into two distinct functions:
Firstly, there are temporary repositories which do not change:
```go
git.OpenRepository(ctx, diskPath)
```
Gitea managed repositories having a record in the database in the
`repository` table are moved into the new package `gitrepo`:
```go
gitrepo.OpenRepository(ctx, repo_model.Repo)
```
Why is `repo_model.Repository` the second parameter instead of file
path?
Because then we can easily adapt our repository storage strategy.
The repositories can be stored locally, however, they could just as well
be stored on a remote server.
## Further changes in other PRs
- A Git Command wrapper on package `gitrepo` could be created. i.e.
`NewCommand(ctx, repo_model.Repository, commands...)`. `git.RunOpts{Dir:
repo.RepoPath()}`, the directory should be empty before invoking this
method and it can be filled in the function only. #28940
- Remove the `RepoPath()`/`WikiPath()` functions to reduce the
possibility of mistakes.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
- Remove `ObjectFormatID`
- Remove function `ObjectFormatFromID`.
- Use `Sha1ObjectFormat` directly but not a pointer because it's an
empty struct.
- Store `ObjectFormatName` in `repository` struct
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.
This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
Due to a bug in the GitLab API, the diff_refs field is populated in the
response when fetching an individual merge request, but not when
fetching a list of them. That field is used to populate the merge base
commit SHA.
While there is detection for the merge base even when not populated by
the downloader, that detection is not flawless. Specifically, when a
GitLab merge request has a single commit, and gets merged with the
squash strategy, the base branch will be fast-forwarded instead of a
separate squash or merge commit being created. The merge base detection
attempts to find the last commit on the base branch that is also on the
PR branch, but in the fast-forward case that is the PR's only commit.
Assuming the head commit is also the merge base results in the import of
a PR with 0 commits and no diff.
This PR uses the individual merge request endpoint to fetch merge
request data with the diff_refs field. With its data, the base merge
commit can be properly set, which—by not relying on the detection
mentioned above—correctly imports PRs that were "merged" by
fast-forwarding the base branch.
ref: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/29620
Before this PR, the PR migration code populates Gitea's MergedCommitID
field by using GitLab's merge_commit_sha field. However, that field is
only populated when the PR was merged using a merge strategy. When a
squash strategy is used, squash_commit_sha is populated instead.
Given that Gitea does not keep track of merge and squash commits
separately, this PR simply populates Gitea's MergedCommitID by using
whichever field is present in the GitLab API response.
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
