If a repository has
git config --add push.pushOption submit=".sourcehut/*.yml"
it failed when pushed because of the unknown submit push
option. It will be ignored instead.
Filtering out the push options is done in an earlier stage, when the
hook command runs, before it submits the options map to the private
endpoint.
* move all the push options logic to modules/git/pushoptions
* add 100% test coverage for modules/git/pushoptions
Test coverage for the code paths from which code was moved to the
modules/git/pushoptions package:
* cmd/hook.go:runHookPreReceive
* routers/private/hook_pre_receive.go:validatePushOptions
tests/integration/git_push_test.go:TestOptionsGitPush runs through
both. The test verifying the option is rejected was removed and, if
added again, will fail because the option is now ignored instead of
being rejected.
* cmd/hook.go:runHookProcReceive
* services/agit/agit.go:ProcReceive
tests/integration/git_test.go: doCreateAgitFlowPull runs through
both. It uses variations of AGit related push options.
* cmd/hook.go:runHookPostReceive
* routers/private/hook_post_receive.go:HookPostReceive
tests/integration/git_test.go:doPushCreate called by TestGit/HTTP/sha1/PushCreate
runs through both.
Note that although it provides coverage for this code path it does not use push options.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/3651
(cherry picked from commit 5561e80b04)
Merging PR may fail because of various problems. The pull request may
have a dirty state because there is no transaction when merging a pull
request. ref
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25741#issuecomment-2074126393
This PR moves all database update operations to post-receive handler for
merging a pull request and having a database transaction. That means if
database operations fail, then the git merging will fail, the git client
will get a fail result.
There are already many tests for pull request merging, so we don't need
to add a new one.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ebf0c969403d91ed80745ff5bd7dfbdb08174fc7)
Conflicts:
modules/private/hook.go
routers/private/hook_post_receive.go
trivial conflicts because
263a716cb5 * Performance optimization for git push (#30104)
was not cherry-picked and because of
998a431747 Do not update PRs based on events that happened before they existed
This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.
Fix #15367
Replaces #23070
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.
We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.
Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.
> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
>
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
>
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
>
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
>
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
# Why this PR comes
At first, I'd like to help users like #23636 (there are a lot)
The unclear "Internal Server Error" is quite anonying, scare users,
frustrate contributors, nobody knows what happens.
So, it's always good to provide meaningful messages to end users (of
course, do not leak sensitive information).
When I started working on the "response message to end users", I found
that the related code has a lot of technical debt. A lot of copy&paste
code, unclear fields and usages.
So I think it's good to make everything clear.
# Tech Backgrounds
Gitea has many sub-commands, some are used by admins, some are used by
SSH servers or Git Hooks. Many sub-commands use "internal API" to
communicate with Gitea web server.
Before, Gitea server always use `StatusCode + Json "err" field` to
return messages.
* The CLI sub-commands: they expect to show all error related messages
to site admin
* The Serv/Hook sub-commands (for git clients): they could only show
safe messages to end users, the error log could only be recorded by
"SSHLog" to Gitea web server.
In the old design, it assumes that:
* If the StatusCode is 500 (in some functions), then the "err" field is
error log, shouldn't be exposed to git client.
* If the StatusCode is 40x, then the "err" field could be exposed. And
some functions always read the "err" no matter what the StatusCode is.
The old code is not strict, and it's difficult to distinguish the
messages clearly and then output them correctly.
# This PR
To help to remove duplicate code and make everything clear, this PR
introduces `ResponseExtra` and `requestJSONResp`.
* `ResponseExtra` is a struct which contains "extra" information of a
internal API response, including StatusCode, UserMsg, Error
* `requestJSONResp` is a generic function which can be used for all
cases to help to simplify the calls.
* Remove all `map["err"]`, always use `private.Response{Err}` to
construct error messages.
* User messages and error messages are separated clearly, the `fail` and
`handleCliResponseExtra` will output correct messages.
* Replace all `Internal Server Error` messages with meaningful (still
safe) messages.
This PR saves more than 300 lines, while makes the git client messages
more clear.
Many gitea-serv/git-hook related essential functions are covered by
tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
* Second attempt at preventing zombies
* Ensure that the pipes are closed in ssh.go
* Ensure that a cancellable context is passed up in cmd/* http requests
* Make cmd.fail return properly so defers are obeyed
* Ensure that something is sent to stdout in case of blocks here
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* placate lint
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* placate lint 2
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* placate lint 3
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fixup
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* add a new internal hook to save ssh log
as title, when a ssh error ocure like #15785.
only when switch ``RUN_MODE`` to dev can we
found which error is ocure. But this way is
not a good idea for production envirment.
this changes try save ssh error mesage to the
log file like other log by a new internal hook.
I think it's usefull for find error message
in production envirment. Thanks.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* rename and fix nit
* Update modules/private/hook.go
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* make notifyWatchers work on multiple actions
* more efficient multiple notifyWatchers
* Make CommitRepoAction take advantage of multiple actions
* Batch post and pre-receive results
* Set batch to 30
* Auto adjust timeout & add logging
* adjust processing message
* Add some messages to pre-receive
* Make any non-200 status code from pre-receive an error
* Add missing hookPrintResults
* Remove shortcut for single action
* mistaken merge fix
* oops
* Move master branch to the front
* If repo was empty and the master branch is pushed ensure that that is set as the default branch
* fixup
* fixup
* Missed HookOptions in setdefaultbranch
* Batch PushUpdateAddTag and PushUpdateDelTag
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Add an option to protected branches to add writing deploy keys to the whitelist for pushing.
Please note this is technically a breaking change: previously if the owner of a repository was on the whitelist then any writing deploy key was effectively on the whitelist. This option will now need to be set if that is desired.
Closes #8472
Details:
* Allow Protected Branches to Whitelist Deploy Keys
* Add migration
* Ensure that IsDeployKey is set to false on the http pushes
* add not null default false
* Fix #6946 by checking PullRequest ID on pushing
* Ensure we have the owner name, the pr attributes and the the issue
* Fix TestSearchRepo by waiting till indexing is done
* Update integrations/repo_search_test.go
* changes as per @mrsdizzie
* missing comma
* Spelling mistake
* Fix full pushing environment
* Move hook functionality internally
* Internalise serv logic
* Remove old internal paths
* finally remove the gitlogger
* Disallow push on archived repositories
* fix lint error
* Update modules/private/key.go
* Update routers/private/hook.go
* Update routers/private/hook.go
* Update routers/private/hook.go
* Updated routers/private/serv.go
* Fix LFS Locks over SSH
* rev-list needs to be run by the hook process
* fixup
* Improve git test
* Ensure that the lfs files are created with a different prefix
* Reduce the replication in git_test.go
* slight refactor
* Remove unnecessary "/"
* Restore ensureAnonymousClone
* Restore ensureAnonymousClone
* Run rev-list on server side
* Try passing in the alternative directories instead
* Mark test as skipped
* Improve git test
* Ensure that the lfs files are created with a different prefix
* Reduce the replication in git_test.go
* Remove unnecessary "/"
