Backport #25417 by @wxiaoguang
Update WorkPath/WORK_PATH related documents, remove out-dated
information.
Remove "StaticRootPath" on the admin config display page, because few
end user really need it, it only causes misconfiguration.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ee47face12)
Backport #25202 by @wxiaoguang
Close #23654
Close #24684
@techknowlogick I still think we need to rename
https://dl.gitea.com/gitea/1.20/ to
https://dl.gitea.com/gitea/1.20-nightly/
`/gitea/1.20/` is quite confusing, it needs these words to explain why.
If we call it `1.20-nightly`, the FAQ can be simplified a lot.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This was intended to be a small followup for
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23712, but...here we are.
1. Our docs currently use `slug` as the entire URL, which makes
refactoring tricky (see https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23712).
Instead, this PR attempts to make future refactoring easier by using
slugs as an extension of the section. (Hugo terminology)
- What the above boils down to is this PR attempts to use directory
organization as URL management. e.g. `usage/comparison.en-us.md` ->
`en-us/usage/comparison/`, `usage/packages/overview.en-us.md` ->
`en-us/usage/packages/overview/`
- Technically we could even remove `slug`, as Hugo defaults to using
filename, however at least with this PR it means `slug` only needs to be
the name for the **current file** rather than an entire URL
2. This PR adds appropriate aliases (redirects) for pages, so anything
on the internet that links to our docs should hopefully not break.
3. A minor nit I've had for a while, renaming `seek-help` to `support`.
It's a minor thing, but `seek-help` has a strange connotation to it.
4. The commits are split such that you can review the first which is the
"actual" change, and the second is added redirects so that the first
doesn't break links elsewhere.
---------
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
- **Installation**: includes how to install Gitea and related other
tools, also includes upgrade Gitea
- **Administration**: includes how to configure Gitea, customize Gitea
and manage Gitea instance out of Gitea admin UI
- **Usage**: includes how to use Gitea's functionalities. A sub
documentation is about packages, in future we could also include CI/CD
and others.
- **Development**: includes how to integrate with Gitea's API, how to
develop new features within Gitea
- **Contributing**: includes how to contribute code to Gitea
repositories.
After this is merged, I think we can have a sub-documentation of `Usage`
part named `Actions` to describe how to use Gitea actions
---------
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Attempt clarify the AppWorkPath in the documentation by using different
notation and adding a section to the start of the cheat sheet.
Fix #21523
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* docs: update the ROOT documentation and error messages
* The documentation now reflects what happens in the
setting/repository.go::newRepository function:
filepath.Join(AppWorkPath, RepoRootPath) was missing.
* The error message displayed when RepoRootPath is not found now
displays the value of RepoRootPath. Given the complexity of the
construction of this value, only referring to it in the abstract
is likely to be misleading to the Gitea admin trying to interpret
the message.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Add a new default theme `auto`, which will automatically switch between
`gitea` (light) and `arc-green` (dark) themes depending on the user's
operating system settings.
Closes: #8183
Gitea allows to whitelist email domains so that only email addresses from certain domains are allowed to register an account, but does not currently allows to do the opposite: blacklisting email domains so that addresses from certain domains are *forbidden* to register an account.
The idea has been briefly mentioned in the discussion about issue #6350, but never implemented. This PR does that.
The rationale is that, in my experience of running a Gitea instance, *a single email domain* is responsible for *most* of the spam accounts, and for *all* of the spam accounts that manage to get past the email confirmation step. So on top of the other spam mitigation measures already available (email confirmation, CAPTCHA, etc.), having the option to block a particularly annoying domain would be helpful.
close #13628
* Store repository data in data path if not previously set
* update docs
* Update docs/content/doc/advanced/config-cheat-sheet.en-us.md
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
* update docs
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
It's causing browser errors logged in Firefox under certain
circumstances, and I think we're better off recommending Linux users to
install a proper emoji font into their system.
* fixed and updated FAQ table of contents links, rewording one heading that wouldn't generate a working link
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Restricted users (#4334): initial implementation
* Add User.IsRestricted & UI to edit it
* Pass user object instead of user id to places where IsRestricted flag matters
* Restricted users: maintain access rows for all referenced repos (incl public)
* Take logged in user & IsRestricted flag into account in org/repo listings, searches and accesses
* Add basic repo access tests for restricted users
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Mention restricted users in the faq
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Revert unnecessary change `.isUserPartOfOrg` -> `.IsUserPartOfOrg`
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Remove unnecessary `org.IsOrganization()` call
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* Revert to an `int64` keyed `accessMap`
* Add type `userAccess`
* Add convenience func updateUserAccess()
* Turn accessMap into a `map[int64]userAccess`
Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se>
* or even better: `map[int64]*userAccess`
* updateUserAccess(): use tighter syntax as suggested by lafriks
* even tighter
* Avoid extra loop
* Don't disclose limited orgs to unauthenticated users
* Don't assume block only applies to orgs
* Use an array of `VisibleType` for filtering
* fix yet another thinko
* Ok - no need for u
* Revert "Ok - no need for u"
This reverts commit 5c3e886aab.
Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
