- Resolves #476
- Follow up for: #540
- Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other.
- Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories.
- Add unblock button to the blocked user list.
- Add blocked since information to the blocked user list.
- Add extra testing to moderation code.
- Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking.
- Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful.
- Add "You haven't blocked any users" message.
- Add organization blocking a user.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802
(cherry picked from commit 0505a10421)
(cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b)
(cherry picked from commit 217475385a)
(cherry picked from commit f2c38ce5c2)
(cherry picked from commit 1edfb68137)
(cherry picked from commit 2cbc12dc74)
(cherry picked from commit 79ff020f18)
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page.
- This will unstar their repositories and visa versa.
- Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations).
- Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests.
- Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments.
- Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540
(cherry picked from commit 687d852480)
(cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde5)
(cherry picked from commit 1791130e3c)
(cherry picked from commit 00f411819f)
(cherry picked from commit e0c039b0e8)
(cherry picked from commit b5a058ef00)
(cherry picked from commit 5ff5460d28)
(cherry picked from commit 97bc6e619d)
Backport #25806 by @yp05327
sort type `oldest` should be `Asc`.
Added a test for this.
I see we have `SearchOrderBy` in db model, but we are using many
different ways to define the sort type.
~Maybe we can improve this later.~
↑ Improved in this PR
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #25707 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes (?) #25538
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/972
Regression #23879#23879 introduced a change which prevents read access to packages if a
user is not a member of an organization.
That PR also contained a change which disallows package access if the
team unit is configured with "no access" for packages. I don't think
this change makes sense (at the moment). It may be relevant for private
orgs. But for public or limited orgs that's useless because an
unauthorized user would have more access rights than the team member.
This PR restores the old behaviour "If a user has read access for an
owner, they can read packages".
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Fixes #24145
To solve the bug, I added a "computed" `TargetBehind` field to the
`Release` model, which indicates the target branch of a release.
This is particularly useful if the target branch was deleted in the
meantime (or is empty).
I also did a micro-optimization in `calReleaseNumCommitsBehind`. Instead
of checking that a branch exists and then call `GetBranchCommit`, I
immediately call `GetBranchCommit` and handle the `git.ErrNotExist`
error.
This optimization is covered by the added unit test.
At first, we have one unified team unit permission which is called
`Team.Authorize` in DB.
But since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17811, we allowed
different units to have different permission.
The old code is only designed for the old version. So after #17811, if
org users have write permission of other units, but have no permission
of packages, they can also get write permission of packages.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
`namedBlob` turned out to be a poor imitation of a `TreeEntry`. Using
the latter directly shortens this code.
This partially undoes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23152/,
which I found a merge conflict with, and also expands the test it added
to cover the subtle README-in-a-subfolder case.
Add test coverage to the important features of
[`routers.web.repo.renderReadmeFile`](067b0c2664/routers/web/repo/view.go (L273));
namely that:
- it can handle looking in docs/, .gitea/, and .github/
- it can handle choosing between multiple competing READMEs
- it prefers the localized README to the markdown README to the
plaintext README
- it can handle broken symlinks when processing all the options
- it uses the name of the symlink, not the name of the target of the
symlink
`renderReadmeFile` needs `readmeTreelink` as parameter but gets
`treeLink`.
The values of them look like as following:
`treeLink`: `/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}`
`readmeTreelink`:
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}/{ReadmeFileName}`
`path.Dir` in
8540fc45b1/routers/web/repo/view.go (L316)
should convert `readmeTreelink` into
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}` instead of the current
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch`.
Fixes #23151
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
During the recent hash algorithm change it became clear that the choice
of password hash algorithm plays a role in the time taken for CI to run.
Therefore as attempt to improve CI we should consider using a dummy
hashing algorithm instead of a real hashing algorithm.
This PR creates a dummy algorithm which is then set as the default
hashing algorithm during tests that use the fixtures. This hopefully
will cause a reduction in the time it takes for CI to run.
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This PR refactors and improves the password hashing code within gitea
and makes it possible for server administrators to set the password
hashing parameters
In addition it takes the opportunity to adjust the settings for `pbkdf2`
in order to make the hashing a little stronger.
The majority of this work was inspired by PR #14751 and I would like to
thank @boppy for their work on this.
Thanks to @gusted for the suggestion to adjust the `pbkdf2` hashing
parameters.
Close #14751
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.
The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.
Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.
In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.
Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:
* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.
Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:
* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.
Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:
* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Fix #21994.
And fix #19470.
While generating new repo from a template, it does something like
"commit to git repo, re-fetch repo model from DB, and update default
branch if it's empty".
19d5b2f922/modules/repository/generate.go (L241-L253)
Unfortunately, when load repo from DB, the default branch will be set to
`setting.Repository.DefaultBranch` if it's empty:
19d5b2f922/models/repo/repo.go (L228-L233)
I believe it's a very old temporary patch but has been kept for many
years, see:
[2d2d85bb](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/2d2d85bb#diff-1851799b06733db4df3ec74385c1e8850ee5aedee70b8b55366910d22725eea8)
I know it's a risk to delete it, may lead to potential behavioral
changes, but we cannot keep the outdated `FIXME` forever. On the other
hand, an empty `DefaultBranch` does make sense: an empty repo doesn't
have one conceptually (actually, Gitea will still set it to
`setting.Repository.DefaultBranch` to make it safer).
- Currently the function `GetUsersWhoCanCreateOrgRepo` uses a query that
is able to have duplicated users in the result, this is can happen under
the condition that a user is in team that either is the owner team or
has permission to create organization repositories.
- Add test code to simulate the above condition for user 3,
[`TestGetUsersWhoCanCreateOrgRepo`](a1fcb1cfb8/models/organization/org_test.go (L435))
is the test function that tests for this.
- The fix is quite trivial use a map keyed by user id in order to drop
duplicates.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Fix #22386
`GetDirectorySize` moved as `getDirectorySize` because it becomes a
special function which should not be put in `util`.
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Some dbs require that all tables have primary keys, see
- #16802
- #21086
We can add a test to keep it from being broken again.
Edit:
~Added missing primary key for `ForeignReference`~ Dropped the
`ForeignReference` table to satisfy the check, so it closes #21086.
More context can be found in comments.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.
> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
> maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
> confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
> **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4
> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.
Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1
> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message
Fixes #21299
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
At the moment a repository reference is needed for webhooks. With the
upcoming package PR we need to send webhooks without a repository
reference. For example a package is uploaded to an organization. In
theory this enables the usage of webhooks for future user actions.
This PR removes the repository id from `HookTask` and changes how the
hooks are processed (see `services/webhook/deliver.go`). In a follow up
PR I want to remove the usage of the `UniqueQueue´ and replace it with a
normal queue because there is no reason to be unique.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
depends on #18871
Added some api integration tests to help testing of #18798.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
This adds an api endpoint `/files` to PRs that allows to get a list of changed files.
built upon #18228, reviews there are included
closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/654
Co-authored-by: Anton Bracke <anton@ju60.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes #21206
If user and viewer are equal the method should return true.
Also the common organization check was wrong as `count` can never be
less then 0.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
- Currently the function takes in the `UserID` option, but isn't being
used within the SQL query. This patch fixes that by checking that only
teams are being returned that the user belongs to.
Fix #20829
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Milestones in archived repos should not be displayed on `/milestones`. Therefore
we should exclude these repositories from milestones page.
Fix #18257
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
- Don't use hacky solution to limit to the correct RepoID's, instead use
current code to handle these limits. The existing code is more correct
than the hacky solution.
- Resolves #19636
- Add test-case
* GetFeeds must always discard actions with dangling repo_id
See https://discourse.gitea.io/t/blank-page-after-login/5051/12
for a panic in 1.16.6.
* add comment to explain the dangling ID in the fixture
* loadRepoOwner must not attempt to use a nil action.Repo
* make fmt
Co-authored-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Targeting #14936, #15332
Adds a collaborator permissions API endpoint according to GitHub API: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/collaborators/collaborators#get-repository-permissions-for-a-user to retrieve a collaborators permissions for a specific repository.
### Checks the repository permissions of a collaborator.
`GET` `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators/{collaborator}/permission`
Possible `permission` values are `admin`, `write`, `read`, `owner`, `none`.
```json
{
"permission": "admin",
"role_name": "admin",
"user": {}
}
```
Where `permission` and `role_name` hold the same `permission` value and `user` is filled with the user API object. Only admins are allowed to use this API endpoint.
Storing the foreign identifier of an imported issue in the database is a prerequisite to implement idempotent migrations or mirror for issues. It is a baby step towards mirroring that introduces a new table.
At the moment when an issue is created by the Gitea uploader, it fails if the issue already exists. The Gitea uploader could be modified so that, instead of failing, it looks up the database to find an existing issue. And if it does it would update the issue instead of creating a new one. However this is not currently possible because an information is missing from the database: the foreign identifier that uniquely represents the issue being migrated is not persisted. With this change, the foreign identifier is stored in the database and the Gitea uploader will then be able to run a query to figure out if a given issue being imported already exists.
The implementation of mirroring for issues, pull requests, releases, etc. can be done in three steps:
1. Store an identifier for the element being mirrored (issue, pull request...) in the database (this is the purpose of these changes)
2. Modify the Gitea uploader to be able to update an existing repository with all it contains (issues, pull request...) instead of failing if it exists
3. Optimize the Gitea uploader to speed up the updates, when possible.
The second step creates code that does not yet exist to enable idempotent migrations with the Gitea uploader. When a migration is done for the first time, the behavior is not changed. But when a migration is done for a repository that already exists, this new code is used to update it.
The third step can use the code created in the second step to optimize and speed up migrations. For instance, when a migration is resumed, an issue that has an update time that is not more recent can be skipped and only newly created issues or updated ones will be updated. Another example of optimization could be that a webhook notifies Gitea when an issue is updated. The code triggered by the webhook would download only this issue and call the code created in the second step to update the issue, as if it was in the process of an idempotent migration.
The ForeignReferences table is added to contain local and foreign ID pairs relative to a given repository. It can later be used for pull requests and other artifacts that can be mirrored. Although the foreign id could be added as a single field in issues or pull requests, it would need to be added to all tables that represent something that can be mirrored. Creating a new table makes for a simpler and more generic design. The drawback is that it requires an extra lookup to obtain the information. However, this extra information is only required during migration or mirroring and does not impact the way Gitea currently works.
The foreign identifier of an issue or pull request is similar to the identifier of an external user, which is stored in reactions, issues, etc. as OriginalPosterID and so on. The representation of a user is however different and the ability of users to link their account to an external user at a later time is also a logic that is different from what is involved in mirroring or migrations. For these reasons, despite some commonalities, it is unclear at this time how the two tables (foreign reference and external user) could be merged together.
The ForeignID field is extracted from the issue migration context so that it can be dumped in files with dump-repo and later restored via restore-repo.
The GetAllComments downloader method is introduced to simplify the implementation and not overload the Context for the purpose of pagination. It also clarifies in which context the comments are paginated and in which context they are not.
The Context interface is no longer useful for the purpose of retrieving the LocalID and ForeignID since they are now both available from the PullRequest and Issue struct. The Reviewable and Commentable interfaces replace and serve the same purpose.
The Context data member of PullRequest and Issue becomes a DownloaderContext to clarify that its purpose is not to support in memory operations while the current downloader is acting but is not otherwise persisted. It is, for instance, used by the GitLab downloader to store the IsMergeRequest boolean and sort out issues.
---
[source](https://lab.forgefriends.org/forgefriends/forgefriends/-/merge_requests/36)
Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Co-authored-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
* add test coverage for original author conversion during migrations
And create a function to factorize a code snippet that is repeated
five times and would otherwise be more difficult to test and maintain
consistently.
Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
* fix variable scope and int64 formatting
* add missing calls to remapExternalUser and fix misplaced %d
Co-authored-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Migrate from U2F to Webauthn
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* migrations: a deadline at January 1st, 1970 is valid
Do not change the deadline value if it is set to January 1st, 1970.
Setting the deadline to year 9999 when it is zero (which is equal to
January 1st, 1970) modifies a deadline set to January 1st, 1970 which
is a valid date. In addition, setting a date in year 9999 will be
converted to a null date in some cases.
Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
* tests: set milestone.deadline_unix in fixtures
The value of deadline_unix must be set to 253370764800 (i.e. 9999-01-01) in
fixtures, otherwise it will be inserted as null which leads to
unexpected errors. For instance, DumpRepository will store a null
deadline_unix as 0 (i.e. 1970-01-01) and RestoreRepository will change
it to 9999-01-01.
Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Co-authored-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* Team permission allow different unit has different permission
* Finish the interface and the logic
* Fix lint
* Fix translation
* align center for table cell content
* Fix fixture
* merge
* Fix test
* Add deprecated
* Improve code
* Add tooltip
* Fix swagger
* Fix newline
* Fix tests
* Fix tests
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read
* Move team units with limited max level below units table
* Update label and column names
* Some improvements
* Fix lint
* Some improvements
* Fix template variables
* Add permission docs
* improve doc
* Fix fixture
* Fix bug
* Fix some bug
* fix
* gofumpt
* Integration test for migration (#18124)
integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo
This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and
RestoreRepository. It:
runs a Gitea server,
dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem,
restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem,
dumps the restored repository to the filesystem,
compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical
The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each
topic of the dump.
Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
* Team permission allow different unit has different permission
* Finish the interface and the logic
* Fix lint
* Fix translation
* align center for table cell content
* Fix fixture
* merge
* Fix test
* Add deprecated
* Improve code
* Add tooltip
* Fix swagger
* Fix newline
* Fix tests
* Fix tests
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read
* Move team units with limited max level below units table
* Update label and column names
* Some improvements
* Fix lint
* Some improvements
* Fix template variables
* Add permission docs
* improve doc
* Fix fixture
* Fix bug
* Fix some bug
* Fix bug
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
They were previously not covered at all, either by integration tests or unit tests.
This PR also fixes a bug where the `num_comments` field was incorrectly set to include all types of comments.
It sets num_closed_issues: 0 as default in milestone unit test fixtures. If they are not set, Incr("num_closed_issues") will be a noop because the field is null.
