This allows `nix flake metadata` and nix in general to lock a *branch*
tarball link in a manner that causes it to fetch the correct commit even
if the branch is updated with a newer version.
For further context, Nix flakes are a feature that, among other things,
allows for "inputs" that are "github:someuser/somerepo",
"https://some-tarball-service/some-tarball.tar.gz",
"sourcehut:~meow/nya" or similar. This feature allows our users to fetch
tarballs of git-based inputs to their builds rather than using git to
fetch them, saving significant download time.
There is presently no gitea or forgejo specific fetcher in Nix, and we
don't particularly wish to have one. Ideally (as a developer on a Nix
implementation myself) we could just use the generic tarball fetcher and
not add specific forgejo support, but to do so, we need additional
metadata to know which commit a given *branch* tarball represents, which
is the purpose of the Link header added here.
The result of this patch is that a Nix user can specify `inputs.something.url =
"https://forgejo-host/some/project/archive/main.tar.gz"` in flake.nix
and get a link to some concrete tarball for the actual commit in the
lock file, then when they run `nix flake update` in the future, they
will get the latest commit in that branch.
Example of it working locally:
» nix flake metadata --refresh 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/jade/cats/archive/main.tar.gz?dir=configs/nix'
Resolved URL: http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/jade/cats/archive/main.tar.gz?dir=configs/nix
Locked URL: 804ede182b.tar.gz?dir=configs
/nix&narHash=sha256-yP7KkDVfuixZzs0fsqhSETXFC0y8m6nmPLw2GrAMxKQ%3D
Description: Computers with the nixos
Path: /nix/store/s856c6yqghyan4v0zy6jj19ksv0q22nx-source
Revision: 804ede182b6b66469b23ea4d21eece52766b7a06
Last modified: 2024-05-02 00:48:32
For details on the header value, see:
56763ff918/doc/manual/src/protocols/tarball-fetcher.md
(cherry picked from commit 6631f56ebf)
Fix #30921
(cherry picked from commit 821d2fc2a3cc897f21d707455850177077b72410)
(cherry picked from commit 50b4e7f26e)
Equivalent to the Gitea v1.22 commit
(cherry picked from commit 8eac16de217978c1f7034f8e360f54d8d638e95e)
Before explaining the fix itself, lets look at the `action` table, and
how it is populated. Data is only ever inserted into it via
`activities_model.NotifyWatchers`, which will:
- Insert a row for each activity with `UserID` set to the acting user's
ID - this is the original activity, and is always inserted if anything
is to be inserted at all.
- It will insert a copy of each activity with the `UserID` set to the
repo's owner, if the owner is an Organization, and isn't the acting
user.
- It will insert a copy of each activity for every watcher of the repo,
as long as the watcher in question has read permission to the repo
unit the activity is about.
This means that if a repository belongs to an organizations, for most
activities, it will have at least two rows in the table. For
repositories watched by people other than their owner, an additional row
for each watcher.
These are useful duplicates, because they record which activities are
relevant for a particular user. However, for cases where we wish to see
the activities that happen around a repository, without limiting the
results to a particular user, we're *not* interested in the duplicates
stored for the watchers and the org. We only need the originals.
And this is what this change does: it introduces an additional option to
`GetFeedsOptions`: `OnlyPerformedByActor`. When this option is set,
`activities.GetFeeds()` will only return the original activities, where
the user id and the acting user id are the same. As these are *always*
inserted, we're not missing out on any activities. We're just getting
rid of the duplicates. As this is an additional `AND` condition, it can
never introduce items that would not have been included in the result
set before, it can only reduce, not extend.
These duplicates were only affecting call sites where `RequestedRepo`
was set, but `RequestedUser` and `RequestedTeam` were not. Both of those
call sites were updated to set `OnlyPerformedByActor`. As a result,
repository RSS feeds, and the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/activities/feeds`
API end points no longer return dupes, only the original activities.
Rather than hardcoding this behaviour into `GetFeeds()` itself, I chose
to implement it as an explicit option, for the sake of clarity.
Fixes Codeberg/Community#684, and addresses gitea#20986.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 9cb2aa989a)
Fix #30807
reuse functions in services
(cherry picked from commit a50026e2f30897904704895362da0fb12c7e5b26)
Conflicts:
models/issues/issue_update.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue.go
trivial context conflict because of 'allow setting the update date on issues and comments'
(cherry picked from commit 6a4bc0289d)
Before, we would just throw 500 if a user passes an attachment that is
not an allowed type. This commit catches this error and throws a 422
instead since this should be considered a validation error.
(cherry picked from commit 872caa17c0a30d95f85ab75c068d606e07bd10b3)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/api_comment_attachment_test.go
tests/integration/api_issue_attachment_test.go
trivial context conflict because of 'allow setting the update date on issues and comments'
(cherry picked from commit 9cd0441cd3)
Backport #30291 by @edwardzhanged
Add some logic in `convert.ToBranchProtection` to return only the names
associated with readAccess instead of returning all names. This will
ensure consistency in behavior between the frontend and backend.
Fixes: #27694
Co-authored-by: Edward Zhang <45360012+edwardzhanged@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: wenzhuo.zhang <wenzhuo.zhang@geely.com>
(cherry picked from commit d88958bb99eabc07dead6965e396755e7b6d947f)
- Currently protected branch rules do not apply to admins, however in
some cases (like in the case of Forgejo project) you might also want to
apply these rules to admins to avoid accidental merges.
- Add new option to configure this on a per-rule basis.
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves #65
Resolves #29965.
---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR
And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:
<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/60799661/bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">
(cherry picked from commit 242b331260925e604150346e61329097d5731e77)
This PR will avoid load pullrequest.Issue twice in pull request list
page. It will reduce x times database queries for those WIP pull
requests.
Partially fix #29585
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 62f8174aa2fae1481c7e17a6afcb731a5b178cd0)
Conflicts:
models/activities/notification_list.go
moved to models/activities/notification.go
In #28691, schedule plans will be deleted when a repo's actions unit is
disabled. But when the unit is enabled, the schedule plans won't be
created again.
This PR fixes the bug. The schedule plans will be created again when the
actions unit is re-enabled
(cherry picked from commit adc3598a75)
Fix #28157
This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule.
- Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to
service layer
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled
or global disabled.
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
(cherry picked from commit 97292da960)
Conflicts:
modules/actions/github.go
routers/web/repo/setting/default_branch.go
routers/web/repo/setting/setting.go
services/repository/branch.go
services/repository/setting.go
tests/integration/actions_trigger_test.go
Fix #20175
Current implementation of API does not allow creating pull requests
between branches of the same
repo when you specify *namespace* (owner of the repo) in `head` field in
http request body.
---
Although GitHub implementation of API allows performing such action and
since Gitea targeting
compatibility with GitHub API I see it as an appropriate change.
I'm proposing a fix to the described problem and test case which covers
this logic.
My use-case just in case:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20175#issuecomment-1711283022
(cherry picked from commit ed02d1fab85c9b8206c0af84dcfc3792e61609cf)
(cherry picked from commit 25b842df261452a29570ba89ffc3a4842d73f68c)
Conflicts:
routers/web/repo/wiki.go
services/repository/branch.go
services/repository/migrate.go
services/wiki/wiki.go
also apply to Forgejo specific usage of the refactored functions
After repository commit status has been introduced on dashaboard, the
most top SQL comes from `GetLatestCommitStatusForPairs`.
This PR adds a cache for the repository's default branch's latest
combined commit status. When a new commit status updated, the cache will
be marked as invalid.
<img width="998" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/76759de7-3a83-4d54-8571-278f5422aed3">
(cherry picked from commit e308d25f1b2fe24b4735432b05e5e221879a2705)
just some refactoring bits towards replacing **util.OptionalBool** with
**optional.Option[bool]**
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
(cherry picked from commit f6656181e4a07d6c415927220efa2077d509f7c6)
Conflicts:
models/repo/repo_list_test.go
trivial shared fixture count conflicts
Since `modules/context` has to depend on `models` and many other
packages, it should be moved from `modules/context` to
`services/context` according to design principles. There is no logic
code change on this PR, only move packages.
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/context` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context`
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/contexttest` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/contexttest` because of depending on
context
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/upload` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context/upload` because of depending on
context
(cherry picked from commit 29f149bd9f517225a3c9f1ca3fb0a7b5325af696)
Conflicts:
routers/api/packages/alpine/alpine.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_reaction.go
routers/install/install.go
routers/web/admin/config.go
routers/web/passkey.go
routers/web/repo/search.go
routers/web/repo/setting/default_branch.go
routers/web/user/home.go
routers/web/user/profile.go
tests/integration/editor_test.go
tests/integration/integration_test.go
tests/integration/mirror_push_test.go
trivial context conflicts
also modified all other occurrences in Forgejo specific files
Adds a new API `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{sha}/pull` that allows
you to get the merged PR associated to a commit.
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
(cherry picked from commit 0a426cc575734e5eff410d6a790f40473117f753)
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)
And help PRs like #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.
(cherry picked from commit f3eb835886031df7a562abc123c3f6011c81eca8)
Conflicts:
modules/web/middleware/binding.go
routers/web/feed/convert.go
tests/integration/branches_test.go
tests/integration/repo_branch_test.go
trivial context conflicts
With this option, it is possible to require a linear commit history with
the following benefits over the next best option `Rebase+fast-forward`:
The original commits continue existing, with the original signatures
continuing to stay valid instead of being rewritten, there is no merge
commit, and reverting commits becomes easier.
Closes #24906
When issue templates were moved into services in
def4956122, the code was also refactored
and simplified. Unfortunately, that simplification broke the
`/api/v1/{owner}/{repo}/issue_templates` route, because it was
previously using a helper function that ignored invalid templates, and
after the refactor, the function it called *always* returned non-nil as
the second return value. This, in turn, results in the aforementioned
end point always returning an internal server error.
This change restores the previous behaviour of ignoring invalid files
returned by `issue.GetTemplatesFromDefaultBranch`, and adds a few test
cases to exercise the endpoint.
Other users of `GetTemplatesFromDefaultBranch` already ignore the second
return value, or handle it correctly, so no changes are necessary there.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Previously, the repo wiki was hardcoded to use `master` as its branch,
this change makes it possible to use `main` (or something else, governed
by `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH`, a setting that already exists and
defaults to `main`).
The way it is done is that a new column is added to the `repository`
table: `wiki_branch`. The migration will make existing repositories
default to `master`, for compatibility's sake, even if they don't have a
Wiki (because it's easier to do that). Newly created repositories will
default to `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH` instead.
The Wiki service was updated to use the branch name stored in the
database, and fall back to the default if it is empty.
Old repositories with Wikis using the older `master` branch will have
the option to do a one-time transition to `main`, available via the
repository settings in the "Danger Zone". This option will only be
available for repositories that have the internal wiki enabled, it is
not empty, and the wiki branch is not `[repository].DEFAULT_BRANCH`.
When migrating a repository with a Wiki, Forgejo will use the same
branch name for the wiki as the source repository did. If that's not the
same as the default, the option to normalize it will be available after
the migration's done.
Additionally, the `/api/v1/{owner}/{repo}` endpoint was updated: it will
now include the wiki branch name in `GET` requests, and allow changing
the wiki branch via `PATCH`.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit d87c526d2a)
- When there's a succesful POST operation, it should return a 201 status
code (which is the status code for succesful created) and additionally
the created object.
- Currently for the `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/tags` endpoint an 200
status code was documented in the OpenAPI specification, while an 201
status code was actually being returned. In this case the code is
correct and the documented status code needs to be adjusted.
- Resolves #2200
(cherry picked from commit a2939116f5)
(cherry picked from commit 22cff41585)
(cherry picked from commit b23a7f27bb)
- Document the correct content types for Git archives. Add code that
actually sets the correct application type for `.zip` and `.tar.gz`.
- When an action (POST/PUT/DELETE method) was successful, an 204 status
code should be returned instead of status code 200.
- Add and adjust integration testing.
- Resolves #2180
- Resolves #2181
(cherry picked from commit 6c8c4512b5)
(cherry picked from commit 3f74bcb14d)
(cherry picked from commit 6ed9057fd7)
Instead of repeating the tests that verify the ID of a comment
is related to the repository of the API endpoint, add the middleware
function commentAssignment() to assign ctx.Comment if the ID of the
comment is verified to be related to the repository.
There already are integration tests for cases of potential unrelated
comment IDs that cover some of the modified endpoints which covers the
commentAssignment() function logic.
* TestAPICommentReactions - GetIssueCommentReactions
* TestAPICommentReactions - PostIssueCommentReaction
* TestAPICommentReactions - DeleteIssueCommentReaction
* TestAPIEditComment - EditIssueComment
* TestAPIDeleteComment - DeleteIssueComment
* TestAPIGetCommentAttachment - GetIssueCommentAttachment
The other modified endpoints do not have tests to verify cases of
potential unrelated comment IDs. They no longer need to because they
no longer implement the logic to enforce this. They however all have
integration tests that verify the commentAssignment() they now rely on
does not introduce a regression.
* TestAPIGetComment - GetIssueComment
* TestAPIListCommentAttachments - ListIssueCommentAttachments
* TestAPICreateCommentAttachment - CreateIssueCommentAttachment
* TestAPIEditCommentAttachment - EditIssueCommentAttachment
* TestAPIDeleteCommentAttachment - DeleteIssueCommentAttachment
(cherry picked from commit d414376d74)
(cherry picked from commit 09db07aeae)
(cherry picked from commit f44830c3cb)
Conflicts:
modules/context/api.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2249
(cherry picked from commit 9d1bf7be15)
