Git has a cool feature called git notes. It allows adding a text to a commit without changing the commit itself. Forgejo already displays git notes. With this PR you can also now change git notes.
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
</details>
## Checklist
The [developer guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/developer/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4753): <!--number 4753 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QWxsb3cgY2hhbmdpbmcgZ2l0IG5vdGVz-->Allow changing git notes<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4753
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Co-committed-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
This is an implementation of a quota engine, and the API routes to
manage its settings. This does *not* contain any enforcement code: this
is just the bedrock, the engine itself.
The goal of the engine is to be flexible and future proof: to be nimble
enough to build on it further, without having to rewrite large parts of
it.
It might feel a little more complicated than necessary, because the goal
was to be able to support scenarios only very few Forgejo instances
need, scenarios the vast majority of mostly smaller instances simply do
not care about. The goal is to support both big and small, and for that,
we need a solid, flexible foundation.
There are thee big parts to the engine: counting quota use, setting
limits, and evaluating whether the usage is within the limits. Sounds
simple on paper, less so in practice!
Quota counting
==============
Quota is counted based on repo ownership, whenever possible, because
repo owners are in ultimate control over the resources they use: they
can delete repos, attachments, everything, even if they don't *own*
those themselves. They can clean up, and will always have the permission
and access required to do so. Would we count quota based on the owning
user, that could lead to situations where a user is unable to free up
space, because they uploaded a big attachment to a repo that has been
taken private since. It's both more fair, and much safer to count quota
against repo owners.
This means that if user A uploads an attachment to an issue opened
against organization O, that will count towards the quota of
organization O, rather than user A.
One's quota usage stats can be queried using the `/user/quota` API
endpoint. To figure out what's eating into it, the
`/user/repos?order_by=size`, `/user/quota/attachments`,
`/user/quota/artifacts`, and `/user/quota/packages` endpoints should be
consulted. There's also `/user/quota/check?subject=<...>` to check
whether the signed-in user is within a particular quota limit.
Quotas are counted based on sizes stored in the database.
Setting quota limits
====================
There are different "subjects" one can limit usage for. At this time,
only size-based limits are implemented, which are:
- `size:all`: As the name would imply, the total size of everything
Forgejo tracks.
- `size:repos:all`: The total size of all repositories (not including
LFS).
- `size:repos:public`: The total size of all public repositories (not
including LFS).
- `size:repos:private`: The total size of all private repositories (not
including LFS).
- `sizeall`: The total size of all git data (including all
repositories, and LFS).
- `sizelfs`: The size of all git LFS data (either in private or
public repos).
- `size:assets:all`: The size of all assets tracked by Forgejo.
- `size:assets:attachments:all`: The size of all kinds of attachments
tracked by Forgejo.
- `size:assets:attachments:issues`: Size of all attachments attached to
issues, including issue comments.
- `size:assets:attachments:releases`: Size of all attachments attached
to releases. This does *not* include automatically generated archives.
- `size:assets:artifacts`: Size of all Action artifacts.
- `size:assets:packages:all`: Size of all Packages.
- `size:wiki`: Wiki size
Wiki size is currently not tracked, and the engine will always deem it
within quota.
These subjects are built into Rules, which set a limit on *all* subjects
within a rule. Thus, we can create a rule that says: "1Gb limit on all
release assets, all packages, and git LFS, combined". For a rule to
stand, the total sum of all subjects must be below the rule's limit.
Rules are in turn collected into groups. A group is just a name, and a
list of rules. For a group to stand, all of its rules must stand. Thus,
if we have a group with two rules, one that sets a combined 1Gb limit on
release assets, all packages, and git LFS, and another rule that sets a
256Mb limit on packages, if the user has 512Mb of packages, the group
will not stand, because the second rule deems it over quota. Similarly,
if the user has only 128Mb of packages, but 900Mb of release assets, the
group will not stand, because the combined size of packages and release
assets is over the 1Gb limit of the first rule.
Groups themselves are collected into Group Lists. A group list stands
when *any* of the groups within stand. This allows an administrator to
set conservative defaults, but then place select users into additional
groups that increase some aspect of their limits.
To top it off, it is possible to set the default quota groups a user
belongs to in `app.ini`. If there's no explicit assignment, the engine
will use the default groups. This makes it possible to avoid having to
assign each and every user a list of quota groups, and only those need
to be explicitly assigned who need a different set of groups than the
defaults.
If a user has any quota groups assigned to them, the default list will
not be considered for them.
The management APIs
===================
This commit contains the engine itself, its unit tests, and the quota
management APIs. It does not contain any enforcement.
The APIs are documented in-code, and in the swagger docs, and the
integration tests can serve as an example on how to use them.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Closes #2797
I'm aware of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28163 exists, but since I had it laying around on my drive and collecting dust, I might as well open a PR for it if anyone wants the feature a bit sooner than waiting for upstream to release it or to be a forgejo "native" implementation.
This PR Contains:
- Support for the `workflow_dispatch` trigger
- Inputs: boolean, string, number, choice
Things still to be done:
- [x] API Endpoint `/api/v1/<org>/<repo>/actions/workflows/<workflow id>/dispatches`
- ~~Fixing some UI bugs I had no time figuring out, like why dropdown/choice inputs's menu's behave weirdly~~ Unrelated visual bug with dropdowns inside dropdowns
- [x] Fix bug where opening the branch selection submits the form
- [x] Limit on inputs to render/process
Things not in this PR:
- Inputs: environment (First need support for environments in forgejo)
Things needed to test this:
- A patch for https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner to actually consider the inputs inside the workflow.
~~One possible patch can be seen here: https://code.forgejo.org/Mai-Lapyst/runner/src/branch/support-workflow-inputs~~
[PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199)
## Testing
- Checkout PR
- Setup new development runner with [this PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/199)
- Create a repo with a workflow (see below)
- Go to the actions tab, select the workflow and see the notice as in the screenshot above
- Use the button + dropdown to run the workflow
- Try also running it via the api using the `` endpoint
- ...
- Profit!
<details>
<summary>Example workflow</summary>
```yaml
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
logLevel:
description: 'Log Level'
required: true
default: 'warning'
type: choice
options:
- info
- warning
- debug
tags:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
boolean_default_true:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: true
type: boolean
default: true
boolean_default_false:
description: 'Test scenario tags'
required: false
type: boolean
default: false
number1_default:
description: 'Number w. default'
default: '100'
type: number
number2:
description: 'Number w/o. default'
type: number
string1_default:
description: 'String w. default'
default: 'Hello world'
type: string
string2:
description: 'String w/o. default'
required: true
type: string
jobs:
test:
runs-on: docker
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: whoami
- run: cat /etc/issue
- run: uname -a
- run: date
- run: echo ${{ inputs.logLevel }}
- run: echo ${{ inputs.tags }}
- env:
GITHUB_CONTEXT: ${{ toJson(github) }}
run: echo "$GITHUB_CONTEXT"
- run: echo "abc"
```
</details>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3334
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Add tag protection manage via rest API.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexander Kogay <kogay.a@citilink.ru>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit d4e4226c3cbfa62a6adf15f4466747468eb208c7)
Conflicts:
modules/structs/repo_tag.go
trivial context conflict
templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl
fixed with make generate-swagger
close #27801
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 62b073e6f31645e446c7e8d6b5a506f61b47924e)
Conflicts:
- modules/util/util.go
Trivial resolution, only picking the newly introduced function
- routers/api/v1/swagger/options.go
Trivial resolution. We don't have UserBadges, don't pick that part.
- templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl
Regenerated.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 8b4ba3dce7)
(cherry picked from commit 196edea0f9)
[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments (squash) do not implicitly create a review
If a comment already exists in a review, the comment is added. If it
is the first comment added to a review, it will implicitly create a
new review instead of adding to the existing one.
The pull_service.CreateCodeComment function is responsibe for this
behavior and it will defer to createCodeComment once the review is
determined, either because it was found or because it was created.
Rename createCodeComment into CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID to expose
it and change the API endpoint to use it instead. Since the review is
provided by the user and verified to exist already, there is no need
for the logic implemented by CreateCodeComment.
The tests are modified to remove the initial comment from the fixture
because it was creating the false positive. I was verified to fail
without this fix.
(cherry picked from commit 6a555996dc)
(cherry picked from commit b173a0ccee)
(cherry picked from commit 838ab9740a)
Expose the repository flags feature over the API, so the flags can be
managed by a site administrator without using the web API.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit bac9f0225d)
(cherry picked from commit e7f5c1ba14)
(cherry picked from commit 95d9fe19cf)
(cherry picked from commit 7fc51991e4)
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)
[this is a follow-up to PR #764]
When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.
-----
Comment:
While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...
I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686)
(cherry picked from commit 511c519c87)
(cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f61)
(cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param
See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a
(cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9)
(cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d)
(cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6)
(cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a49)
(cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c2)
(cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a74)
According to the GitHub API Spec:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-an-organization-secret
Merge the Create and Update secret into a single API.
- Remove the `CreateSecretOption` struct and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateSecretOption` in `modules/structs/secret.go`
- Update the `CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` to use `CreateOrUpdateSecretOption`
instead of `UpdateSecretOption`
- Remove the `CreateOrgSecret` function in
`routers/api/v1/org/action.go` and replace it with
`CreateOrUpdateOrgSecret`
- Update the Swagger documentation in
`routers/api/v1/swagger/options.go` and `templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl`
to reflect the changes in the struct names and function names
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
- Add a new `CreateSecretOption` struct for creating secrets
- Implement a `CreateOrgSecret` function to create a secret in an
organization
- Add a new route in `api.go` to handle the creation of organization
secrets
- Update the Swagger template to include the new `CreateOrgSecret` API
endpoint
---------
Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
This adds an API for uploading and Deleting Avatars for of Users, Repos
and Organisations. I'm not sure, if this should also be added to the
Admin API.
Resolves #25344
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This PR creates an API endpoint for creating/updating/deleting multiple
files in one API call similar to the solution provided by
[GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/commits.html#create-a-commit-with-multiple-files-and-actions).
To archive this, the CreateOrUpdateRepoFile and DeleteRepoFIle functions
in files service are unified into one function supporting multiple files
and actions.
Resolves #14619
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393
Closes #22115
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Remove `[repository.editor] PREVIEWABLE_FILE_MODES` setting that seemed
like it was intended to support this but did not work. Instead, whenever
viewing a file shows a preview, also have a Preview tab in the file
editor.
Add new `/markup` web and API endpoints with `comment`, `gfm`,
`markdown` and new `file` mode that uses a file path to determine the
renderer.
Remove `/markdown` web endpoint but keep the API for backwards and
GitHub compatibility.
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
The `[repository.editor] PREVIEWABLE_FILE_MODES` setting was removed.
This setting served no practical purpose and was not working correctly.
Instead a preview tab is always shown in the file editor when supported.
---------
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
this is a simple endpoint that adds the ability to rename users to the
admin API.
Note: this is not in a mergeable state. It would be better if this was
handled by a PATCH/POST to the /api/v1/admin/users/{username} endpoint
and the username is modified.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix #16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
- Add a new push mirror to specific repository
- Sync now ( send all the changes to the configured push mirrors )
- Get list of all push mirrors of a repository
- Get a push mirror by ID
- Delete push mirror by ID
Signed-off-by: Mohamed Sekour <mohamed.sekour@exfo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
[spectral](https://github.com/stoplightio/spectral) lints
openapi/swagger files for mistakes of which it has identified a few and
which I've fixed.
I had to put it into `lint-frontend` because it depends on node_modules
so can not run on Drone during the backend target. I plan to refactor
these targets later to `lint-js` and `lint-go` so that they are
categorized based on the tool dependencies.
There is a subtle problem with the Swagger definition for AccessTokens which causes
autogeneration of APIs for these endpoints to fail.
This PR corrects these errors.
Ref: https://github.com/zeripath/java-gitea-api/issues/4
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Forms are dependent on models and therefore should be in services.
This PR also removes the old auth. aliasing
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Use [chi](https://github.com/go-chi/chi) instead of the forked [macaron](https://gitea.com/macaron/macaron). Since macaron and chi have conflicts with session share, this big PR becomes a have-to thing. According my previous idea, we can replace macaron step by step but I'm wrong. :( Below is a list of big changes on this PR.
- [x] Define `context.ResponseWriter` interface with an implementation `context.Response`.
- [x] Use chi instead of macaron, and also a customize `Route` to wrap chi so that the router usage is similar as before.
- [x] Create different routers for `web`, `api`, `internal` and `install` so that the codes will be more clear and no magic .
- [x] Use https://github.com/unrolled/render instead of macaron's internal render
- [x] Use https://github.com/NYTimes/gziphandler instead of https://gitea.com/macaron/gzip
- [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/session which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/session and removed `nodb` support since it will not be maintained. **BREAK**
- [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/captcha which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/captcha
- [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/cache which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/cache
- [x] Use https://gitea.com/go-chi/binding which is a modified version of https://gitea.com/macaron/binding
- [x] Use https://github.com/go-chi/cors instead of https://gitea.com/macaron/cors
- [x] Dropped https://gitea.com/macaron/i18n and make a new one in `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/translation`
- [x] Move validation form structs from `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/auth` to `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/forms` to avoid dependency cycle.
- [x] Removed macaron log service because it's not need any more. **BREAK**
- [x] All form structs have to be get by `web.GetForm(ctx)` in the route function but not as a function parameter on routes definition.
- [x] Move Git HTTP protocol implementation to use routers directly.
- [x] Fix the problem that chi routes don't support trailing slash but macaron did.
- [x] `/api/v1/swagger` now will be redirect to `/api/swagger` but not render directly so that `APIContext` will not create a html render.
Notices:
- Chi router don't support request with trailing slash
- Integration test `TestUserHeatmap` maybe mysql version related. It's failed on my macOS(mysql 5.7.29 installed via brew) but succeed on CI.
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* use different structs for MigrateRepoOptions on UI and API
* Fix TokenAuth and rename UID to an understandable Name
* fix swagger doc
* simplify & mk redable
* R E F A C T O R:
migration has now internal 3 structs to store its options:
* the Options for WebUI: modules/auth/repo_form.go
* the Options for API: modules/structs/repo.go
* the option struct with after validation for internal prossessing: modules/migrations/base/options.go
* Copyright Header
* Deprecate UID - add RepoOwner
* adopt repo.go -> migrate.go
* add comment about each struct purpose
* lint
* [FEATURE] [API] Add Endpoint for Branch Creation
Issue: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/11376
This commit introduces an API endpoint for branch creation.
The added route is POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/branches.
A JSON with the name of the new branch and the name of the old branch is
required as parameters.
Signed-off-by: Terence Le Huu Phuong <terence@qwasar.io>
* Put all the logic into CreateBranch and removed CreateRepoBranch
* - Added the error ErrBranchDoesNotExist in error.go
- Made the CreateNewBranch function return an errBranchDoesNotExist error
when the OldBranch does not exist
- Made the CreateBranch API function checks that the repository is not
empty and that branch exists.
* - Added a resetFixtures helper function in integration_test.go to
fine-tune test env resetting
- Added api test for CreateBranch
- Used resetFixture instead of the more general prepareTestEnv in the
repo_branch_test CreateBranch tests
* Moved the resetFixtures call inside the loop for APICreateBranch function
* Put the prepareTestEnv back in repo_branch_test
* fix import order/sort api branch test
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* add API endpoint to create OAuth2 Application.
* move endpoint to /user. Add swagger documentations and proper response type.
* change json tags to snake_case. add CreateOAuth2ApplicationOptions to swagger docs.
* change response status to Created (201)
* add methods to list OAuth2 apps and delete an existing OAuth2 app by ID.
* add APIFormat convert method and file header
* fixed header
* hide secret on oauth2 application list
* add Created time to API response
* add API integration tests for create/list/delete OAuth2 applications.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* add API branch protection endpoint
* lint
* Change to use team names instead of ids.
* Status codes.
* fix
* Fix
* Add new branch protection options (BlockOnRejectedReviews, DismissStaleApprovals, RequireSignedCommits)
* Do xorm query directly
* fix xorm GetUserNamesByIDs
* Add some tests
* Improved GetTeamNamesByID
* http status created for CreateBranchProtection
* Correct status code in integration test
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* Create API endpoints for repo topics.
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Generate swagger
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Add documentation to functions
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Grammar fix
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Fix function comment
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Can't use FindTopics when looking for a single repo topic, as it doesnt use exact match
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Add PUT /repos/{owner}/{repo}/topics and remove GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/topics
* Ignore if topic is sent twice in same request, refactoring.
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Fix topic dropdown with api changes.
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Style fix
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Update API documentation
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Better way to handle duplicate topics in slice
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Make response element TopicName an array of strings, instead of using an array of TopicName
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Add test cases for API Repo Topics.
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Fix format of tests
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Fix comments
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Fix unit tests after adding some more topics to the test fixture.
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Update models/topic.go
Limit multiple if else if ...
Co-Authored-By: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
* Engine as first parameter in function
Co-Authored-By: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com>
* Replace magic numbers with http status code constants.
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Fix variable scope
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Test one read with login and one with token
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Add some more tests
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Use empty struct for efficiency
Co-Authored-By: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Add test case to check access for user with write access
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Fix access, repo admin required to change topics
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Correct first test to be without token
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Any repo reader should be able to access topics.
* No need for string pointer
Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com>
* Feature - #5960 - API Endpoint for Repo Editing
* Revert from merge
* Adds integration testing
* Updates to integration tests
* Revert changes
* Update year in file header
* Misspell fix
* XORM = test
* XORM = test
* revert XORM = file
* Makes RepoUnit.ID be pk and autoincr
* Fix to units
* revert header
* Remove print statement
* Adds other responses
* Improves swagger for creating repo
* Fixes import order
* Better Unit Type does not exist error
* Adds editable repo properties to the response repo structure
* Fix to api_repo_edit_test.go
* Fixes repo test
* Changes per review
* Fixes typo and standardizes comments in the EditRepoOption struct for swagger
* Fixes typo and standardizes comments in the EditRepoOption struct for swagger
* Actually can unarchive through the API
* Unlike delete, user doesn't have to be the owner of the org, just admin to the repo
* Fix to swagger comments for field name change
* Update to swagger docs
* Update swagger
* Changes allow_pull_requests to has_pull_requests
* Add API for manipulating Git hooks
Signed-off-by: Segev Finer <segev@codeocean.com>
* Replace code.gitea.io/sdk with PR branch temporarily for CI
* Switch back to code.gitea.io/sdk@master
* Return 403 instead of 404 on no permission to edit hooks in API
* Add tests for Git hooks API
* Update models/repo_list_test.go
Co-Authored-By: segevfiner <segev208@gmail.com>
* Update models/repo_list_test.go
Co-Authored-By: segevfiner <segev208@gmail.com>
* empty line
* Implemented basic api endpoint to manage deadlines
* Fixed checking for permissions
* Updating a deadline from the ui is now entirely done via the api
* cleanup
* Cosmetics
* fixed lint + fmt
* Added swagger model definition for deadline response
* Updated gitea-sdk
* Updated gitea-sdk
* More cleanup
* Generate swagger json
* Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea into issue-due-date-api
# Conflicts:
# public/swagger.v1.json
* Fixed permission to update a deadline via api
* Re-added form to change a deadline
* Added client-side validation + not ignore error messages from the api
* Added locale for error message
* Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
# Conflicts:
# models/issue_comment.go
* Proper date validation
* Fixed indention
* moved css to css file
* added documentation for error codes
* after merge cleanup
* Added swagger description
* DO NOTHING BUT TRIGGER THAT F*CKIN CI SO IT PICKS UP THE LATEST COMMIT AS IT SHOULD
* DO NOTHING BUT TRIGGER THAT F*CKIN CI SO IT PICKS UP THE LATEST COMMIT AS IT SHOULD
* regenerated stylesheets
Fix all the resting errors to have a valid swagger file.
They are still some warnings but nothing blocking.
Doing so I found that some request still misses son parameters for some POST/PUT/PATCH request. This means the a client generated from the swagger file will not work completely.
Fix #4088 by activating validation in drone
Should fix #4010.
* Partial fix for #4010
Swagger needs a comment line above each swagger:response comment -- it
uses these to populate the description: fields. Adding minimal text
for now on the way to getting swagger validate to pass. Many standard
swagger client libraries will not work at all with gitea until validate
passes, so prioritizing that over better descriptions for now.
Signed-off-by: Steve Traugott <stevegt@t7a.org>
* Add Attachment API
* repos/:owner/:repo/releases (add attachments)
* repos/:owner/:repo/releases/:id (add attachments)
* repos/:owner/:repo/releases/:id/attachments
* repos/:owner/:repo/releases/:id/attachments/:attachment_id
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
* Add unit tests for new attachment functions
Fix comments
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* fix lint
* Update vendor.json
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* remove version of sdk
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Fix unit tests
Add missing license header
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Add CreateReleaseAttachment
Add EditReleaseAttachment
Add DeleteReleaseAttachment
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Add filename query parameter for choosing another name for an attachment
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Fix order of imports
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Restricting updatable attachment columns
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* gofmt
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Update go-sdk
Replace Attachments with Assets
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
* Update go-sdk
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
* Updating go-sdk and regenerating swagger
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Add missing file of go-sdk
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Change origin of code.gitea.io/sdk to code.gitea.io/sdk
Update code.gitea.io/sdk
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Update swagger
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Update updateAttachment
